Opinion
War Against Insurgency
Insurgency refers to armed aggression by groups of rebels fighting against the government of their own country. Issues involved in insurgency movements usually have to do with separatist agitations arising from political marginalisation, religious proselytism pursued through armed aggression; land-grabbing banditry and foreign-sponsored expansionist proclivity for economic, religious or political purposes. There is also neocolonialist aspect of insurgency, arising from genetic propensity to lord and rule over other groups, as a civilising mission. Historically, there are wandering and marauding races, with an irresistible urge to expand and conquer others.
It was quite instructive that the National Security Adviser to President Muhammadu Buhari, retired Major General Babagana Monguno, named “Islamic Groups Behind Boko Haram, Terrorism in Nigeria” – The Tide 15/12/2021. Monguno identified Jama’at Nasr al-Islam Wal Muslimin (JNIM), Islamic and Muslim Support Group; and Islamic State in Greater Sahara (ISGS) as organisations behind terrorism in Nigeria and other regions in Africa. Coming from such an eminent public notary, Monguno’s revelation was a confirmation of what many Nigeria’s knew before now.
What retired Major General Babagana Monguno did not say, though relevant, is the position of a global body of Islamic brotherhood, the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC), on the activities of the named Islamic groups. Considering the huge expense involved in insurgency movements, there is a need to ask about the key motives and goals of the groups behind banditry and terrorism in Nigeria and Africa! What goals do the aggressive groups want to achieve, that can warrant such devotion and commitment? And funding!
As a sovereign and independent nation, whose constitution guarantees freedom of worship, conscience, conviction and associations; is it not an act of aggression that groups of insurgents should hold Nigeria hostage? Over what grouse, to warrant President Muhammadu Buhari to say that: “We’re In Final Phase of War Against Insurgency”? – The Tide, Friday 24/12/2021. Hiding under the nomenclature of banditry, aggressive groups had taken up arms against Nigeria, warranting the launching of a final phase of war against insurgency.
President Buhari, addressing troops at the Air Force Base in Maiduguri, said that “the entire nation remains grateful for the gallantry displayed in ensuring gradual return of peace to the North-East…” The President went on to say: “I urge you also to stay focused to achieve our strategic end-state which is the defeat of all adversaries and restoration of an economically viable North-East Geopolitical Zone …” Obviously groups of insurgents are adversaries who deserve to be treated measure for measure, and in the language they understand.
Nigerians were told that “Brigadier General Dzarma Zirkushu and other personnel of 25 and 28 Task Force Brigades, died on November 13, 2021. Other personnel had also died in other operational areas across the country. Such tragic deaths of members of the nation’s armed forces are sad prices being paid, albeit quite involuntarily, in a war against insurgency. What many Nigerians have wondered about is the classification of IPOB as a terrorist group, while other groups of insurgents are being described as bandits. While the demand of one group is clearly stated in the open, other groups such as those mentioned by Babagana Monguno, have not made a clear declaration of what they want to achieve.
There is yet another aspect of the insurgency issue which many Nigerians are not comfortable about, which is the visible presence of aggressive security personnel in South-Eastern Nigeria, than there are in Boko Haram zones. There had been denials that the Boko Haram and ISWAP species of bandits were being treated with kid-gloves, but many observers are not quite impressed with the antics of the war against insurgency. Someone was also quick to say that naming and shaming sponsors of insurgency-related insecurity in the country is not the priority of the Federal Government. Then what is?
The Burning Grass, a humorous book written by late Cyprian Ekwensi, and published 1962, introduced us to the phenomenon of “Sokugo” or the Wandering disease, whereby Maisunsaye as a fictional character, would embark on wandering from one desert zone to another. Thus, the Boko Haram phenomenon and life style can be a reminder that the wandering disease, as an inexplicable propensity, is not merely a fiction. Whatever that may give rise to “Sokugo” or the wandering disease, its victims, like Maisonsaye, are known to be wanderers, with no settled habitation. Looking for what?
Another issue arising from the war against insurgency is the fact that the Boko Haram and ISWAP variants of insurgents are not always Nigerian citizens. There had been a suggestion in some quarters long ago that the Fulani Ethnic Nationality Movement (FUNAM) had a standing agendum of providing a homeland settlement for all Fulani stock in West Africa. Nigeria featured as being a homeland handed to the Fulani by British colonial administrators. One Badu Salisu Ahmadu, was audacious enough to reveal in 2018 that there was a “Fulani Strike Force ready to claim Nigeria.
For the purposes of mutual trust, security and peaceful co-existence, the Federal Government of Nigeria should rise up to the issue of insurgency and seek to address the demands at stake. A large number of Nigerians believe that former President, retired General Olusegun Obasanjo, did not mean a joke when he alerted Nigerians about Islamisation and Fulanisation agenda, not long ago. Several other individuals and groups have also pointed out the possibility of Boko Haram insurgency being a part of a coordinated plan to enact the Afghanistan tale in Nigeria. Mention of a religious war had also been made.
Another angle from which some observers view the issue of insurgency in Nigeria is that religion and banditry-related insecurity are mere Smoke-screen applied to divert attention away from something else. Thus, hiding under religion and politics, some clandestine economic agenda are being perfected, without the Kingpins allowing themselves to be identified. That Clandestine agendum devolves around Nigeria’s political economy, of which oil and gas resources are the driving power. It is a complex issue involving local and foreign interests, but all said and done, the stakes are quite high.
Late Ken Saro-Wiwa would say that high fences make good neighbours. That local idiom implies that peace and good neighbourliness are fostered where people’s privacies, rights and boundaries are respected. Unfortunately, wandering tribes of humanity, fired by ambition, vanity and “Sokugo” disease, would not allow those they consider weak and vulnerable, have peace. What are the issues at stake in the War against insurgency? Let us face them boldly and with justice!
By: Bright Amirize
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
-
Sports4 days agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports4 days agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports4 days agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Sports4 days agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Sports4 days agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
-
Sports4 days agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports4 days agoBarca Pull Out Of Super League Project
-
Sports4 days agoPalmer Stars As Chelsea Compound Wolves Woes