Opinion

Christ, Medium Of Communication?

Published

12 years ago

February 21, 2014

The concept of prayer or communciation with Deity has
been miscontrued in christendom by many religious adherents. I can recall that at Mount Sinai, Prophet Moses was summoned to receive the Golden Rules in tablets of stones for the guidance of the children of Israel. In the said rules and regulations, the first two commandments read thus: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow thyself to them, nor serve them … “ Exodus 20 vs 3-6 (KJV).
Since the rebellion of Lucifer (Satan) against the government of Jehovah in heaven which brought about the holy war (Rev. 12 vs 7 -9) fought by the disloyal angels with the angels that were loyal to God’s instruction, Satan has been relentless in seducing God’s children to always go the wrong way in stark disobedience and opposition to what God says.
The first deception of the first couple in the Garden of Eden is living evidence. Satan said that it did not matter for they would not surely die which was against the explicit instructions of the Creator of the entire universe as contained in Genesis 3 vs 1-4. This singular act of deception is ravaging the inhabitants of the earth even in christendom, hence the belief of reincarnation and immortality of the soul that do not have any scriptural background should be discarded forthwith – Ecclesiastes 9 vs 5,10. Follow the right things always and give no room for satanic influences.
The Christian religion is about the life, teachings and practices of Jesus Christ as shown amongst the Bereans who searched the Scriptures daily in order to know and understand the truth of salvation. In Acts of the Apostles, the Bereans were highly commended for their zealousness to know the truth – Acts 17 v 11. Of course, Jesus Christ, whom every professed Christian tends to follow emphatically, asserted that nobody will be free except he or she knows the truth. Invariably, this is an indication that anybody without the full knowledge and understanding of the truth as contained in the Holy Scriptures is in darkness – see John 5 v 39 and 8 v 32 respectively.
It is true that a professing Christian would in no doubt live a prayerful lifestyle in order to survive the whirls of the devil as well as being in close communication and good relationship with God as outlined in 1 st Thessalonians 5 vs 17,19 which says “pray without ceasing … quench not the Spirit.” However, throughout the synoptic gospels, there is no single chapter or verse authorising that communication or prayer with God should be channeled through any other medium, be it prophets, angels, saints of any age, loved ones like the Virgin Mary (Jesus’ mother) or whoever than to pray directly to our Heavenly Father according to the injunction in Mathew 6 v 9 which supports the first two commandments handed down to Prophet Moses at Mount Sinai as indicated above.
The fact is that the wonderful sacrifice of Jesus at the stake with His precious blood as well as being our High Priest in the Heavenly sanctuary, it is expedient that at the end of the Christian supplication or communion with the Father, it should only be terminated or concluded through Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour to make it very authentic because He is pleading and interceding in our stead before His Father in the sanctuary pitched in Heaven and not earthly sanctuary which came to an end with the cruxifiction of Christ on the Cross of Calvary.
Jesus alone has the right and authority to scrutinize our prayers through the aid of the Holy Spirit to the throne of Grace and not through any mortal being, whether alive or dead. Jesus is God in human flesh while on earth (John 1 vs 1 & 14). He is the only medium of communication with heaven through the ministration of the Holy Spirit.
It is very curious to believe that the Mother of Jesus could be a medium of communication between mankind and God. At this juncture, one may posit: What is the role and function of our Saviour Jesus Christ in this context? In fact, the misconception of medium of appropriate communication with God is as a result of the scheming of the arch-deceiver (Satan the Devil) who is always thwarting the plans of God and does not want people to acquire the true knowledge of the word of God for appropriate and adequate enlightenment. No wonder, Prophet Hosea in his prophetic writings in Chapter 4 v 6, lamented that “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; not necessarily that but rather they had rejected knowledge.”
Taking a retrospective view at the sacrificial or Levitical era, there were channels of communication with God through ceremonial/sacrificial services before the first advent of the Messiah, the God-man who was born to chart a new course of doing things in His righteousness. Frankly speaking, before the Cross, the then religious leaders were focused and highly honoured as infallible as well as ex-cathedral (i.e. Vicar of Christ) on earth through whom the people would obtain repentance, forgiveness of sin by penance and prayers are channeled to. All these were handwriting of ordinances that was against Christian ethics which ended at the Cross with the sacrifice of Jesus as He lamented “It is finished.” Those ceremonial or sacrificial activities were brought to an end as you read in the book of Deuteronomy 31 v 26 and Colossians 2 v 14.
It has been advised that for proper understanding of the Scriptures, it should be compared precept by precept, line by line, to make a contrast for adequate knowledge of a particular issue because the Bible is its own interpreter, according to Isaiah 28 v 10 . During the consolation of Jesus to His beloved while He hung on the Cross of Calvary, He made a remarkable assertion as recorded by one of His erudite disciples in John 19 vs 26,27 thus: “Woman, behold thy son,” while to John, He said “Son behold thy mother.” How do you read, how do you understand.
Inasmuch as it is written “honour thy father and thy mother so that your days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee” as enshrined in the fifth commandment (Exodus 20 v 12), it does not portray or give notion of worshipping them in place of God which may tantamount to worshipping idols or having other gods before the Almighty God.
Similarly, prayer should not be channeled to God through any other means except through Jesus only.
Apostle Paul cautioned his obedient servant (Timothy) in the Lord that time shall come when people would not endure sound doctrines, but shall follow after their own lusts and heap to themselves teachers with itching ears who will turn away their ears from the truth and rather turn unto fables or falsehood (2nd Timothy 4 vs 3, 4).
Those who erroneously pray through the Virgin Mary should desist from such practice(s) and do that which is right – 1st John 2 v 1. Jesus said “I am the way, the truth and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me (John 14 v 6). This statement was expatiated by Apostle Peter that there is no salvation in any other name beside the name of Jesus (Acts 4 v 12). Therefore, he who has ears let him/her adhere to the praying principles of the Master of all and not through any unathorised medium.

Ominyanwa is a public affairs analyst.

Goddey Ominyanwa

Opinion

Agony In Ivory Tower

Published

13 hours ago

March 9, 2026

The Tide

Quote: A university that tolerates missing scripts, result manipulation and ‘sorting’ is not merely failing students—it is quietly destroying the moral foundation of education itself.”

The sad cases of missing scripts, compulsory Sorting, inputting of wrong results and other obnoxious practices in some public universities, leave much to be desired. One cannot imagine how a student will be compelled to suffer consequences of the flagrant negligence of a Head of Department, a lecturer, Department staff or an ICT staff.Many academic and non academic staff in several public universities seem to be performing far below standard, thus unproductive to the university system. The unacceptable cases of sorting, missing scripts, missing results, inputting of wrong grades to students, should not be mentioned in a university, not even in any academic community. This is because people who are employed to work in various positions should have cognate work experience and unquestionable competence. They should not be seen as certificate welding illiterates but people who have been proven to be worthy in learning and character, diligent and competent to carry out assigned responsibilities with minimal or no supervision.

The university as a citadel of learning should boast of men of integrity, people who are repositories of applied knowledge and competence to drive the much desired holistic development in a nation that functions on quality teaching and learning. A situation where a student having gone through the crucibles of learning and written a prescribed semester examination or class-based evaluation test, is told that his or her script is missing or that he or she did not participate in that academic exercise, or must sort to pass, is an unpardonable error and a height of callousness. In fact some lecturers and staff of Departments are using the seeming systemic defect (which is their architecture) as an opportunity to extort students. Sometimes it is discovered much to students chagrin that the supposed missing script was later discovered when a ransom was paid.

Since a lecturer, or Head of Department has in their disposal both Yam and the knife and determines who takes what (if they wish to give without strings), students have no alternative but to submit to their importunate demands in order to graduate at record time.Such practices should be unheard of in an institution that should be a vanguard of moral and ethical values and conduct. What people learn in school constitute their behavioural patterns in the society. Where the school as an agency of socialisation cannot drive positive change first in its immediate environment, then the objective of education as a bedrock for the development of society, is inevitably compromised and counter-productive. The German Reformer, Dr. Martins Luther was quoted as saying, “I advise parents not to put their wards or children in any school where the Bible is not being used as a rule of life because such institutions will unnecessarily be corrupt”.

Gleaning from Luther’s sentiment one can deduce that the lack of respect and regard for values as well as the absence of the fear of God is the greatest undoing of most public schools. Another major challenge is that lack of Information, Communication and Technology literacy or compliance on the part of some lecturers and heads of department, may have informed the decision to give students’ scripts to secretaries to compile and input students results thereby making the secretaries the determinants of students’ fate. It is not saying a new thing that some of the secretaries in the process of compiling results have inputted wrong results, omitted names or down graded some students or given unmerited grades to others.Society today is ICT-driven and ICT-literacy enhances efficiency, speed and a reasonable degree of accuracy if the person behind the computer is level headed, articulate, competent, alive to responsibilities and is aware that negligence on his or her part is not only tantamount to a disservice to the university but to the students who may not graduate at record time because of his or her (computer operator’s) gross ineptitude or carelessness.

The ICT era makes the carrying of hard copy of results obsolete as lecturers through the Heads of Department can log on to the central server of the Exams and Records (if any) or ICT unit and input students’ results directly. By so doing the incessant cases where result on spread sheet is different from the one published online, more often than not, caused by abject negligence, will be avoided. The process will also end the intermediary services of some staff in the universities’ Information, Communication and Technology Department which has become a money spinner-a lucrative source of income to many of them. In fact some ICT staff reserved the power to award grades to students depending on students’ degree of compliance to terms and conditions. They can dubiously make or unmake a student. The university community should be considered too lofty to have careless, negligent, immoral and academic or professionally deficient people as academic or non-academic staff.

The Governing Councils and Senates of universities should be proactive in addressing the menace of missing Script, inputting of wrong results and sorting. This is necessary to end the slogan “Education is scam” so the system can produce quality students who are truly found worthy in learning and in character by operators who exemplify diligence, moral and ethical values. The much-needed reform must begin within the institutions themselves, because the future of any society is shaped in its classrooms.

By: Igbiki Benibo

Opinion

Strength of Emotional Equality

Published

13 hours ago

March 9, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “Love thrives not when one gives more, but when both give fully — not in competition, not in performance, but in partnership.”

In every healthy relationship, there exists an invisible balance. It is not measured in grand gestures, expensive gifts, or public displays of affection. It is measured in something quieter and far more significant: emotional equality. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, love becomes less of a negotiation and more of a partnership. Emotional equality does not mean both individuals express love in identical ways. It does not require matching personalities or mirroring temperaments. Rather, it speaks to balance — a shared willingness to invest, to communicate, to be vulnerable, and to grow. It is the difference between two people walking side by side and one person constantly trying to catch up.

In many relationships, imbalance begins subtly. One partner initiates most conversations. One apologizes more frequently. One carries the emotional labor — remembering important dates, managing conflicts, sensing tension, and attempting reconciliation. Over time, this uneven distribution of emotional effort breeds exhaustion. The partner who gives more begins to feel unseen. The one who gives less may grow comfortable in emotional passivity. Love, in such a space, starts to tilt — slowly at first, then significantly. Resentment can creep in quietly, disguising itself as patience. Silence may replace honest dialogue. What once felt effortless begins to feel heavy.

When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, responsibility is shared. Both people are accountable for the health of the relationship. If conflict arises, neither hides behind silence nor dominates through control. Instead, they engage. They listen. They speak honestly without weaponizing words. Equality creates safety — and safety strengthens intimacy. It allows both individuals to express needs without fear of ridicule or rejection. One of the most overlooked aspects of emotional equality is vulnerability. True connection requires courage. It demands that both partners risk being misunderstood. But when vulnerability is one-sided, it becomes exposure rather than intimacy. If one person consistently opens up while the other remains guarded, trust cannot fully deepen.

Equality ensures that emotional risks are mutual. Where one shares fears, the other shares too. Where one admits weakness, the other responds with openness rather than judgment. In such a space, authenticity flourishes. Another crucial element is validation. In emotionally balanced relationships, both partners feel heard. Their concerns are not dismissed as “overreactions.” Their feelings are not minimized or compared. When couples operate on equal emotional ground, they acknowledge each other’s experiences as legitimate. They may not always agree, but they always respect. Validation does not mean surrendering one’s viewpoint; it means recognizing that another’s emotional reality matters.

Equality also protects individuality. Contrary to popular belief, healthy love does not erase personal identity — it enhances it. When both partners are emotionally secure, they do not feel threatened by each other’s independence. Personal ambitions are encouraged, not resented. Friendships are respected, not restricted. Growth is celebrated, not feared. Standing on equal emotional grounds means neither person shrinks to accommodate the other. Instead, both expand, knowing the relationship is strong enough to hold their evolution. Power dynamics often expose emotional inequality. When one partner controls communication — appearing and disappearing unpredictably, withholding affection, or using silence as leverage — imbalance emerges.

Emotional dominance weakens intimacy. It creates anxiety instead of assurance. But when couples share emotional power, there is consistency. There is clarity. There is no need to decode affection because it is offered freely and intentionally. It is important to understand that equality does not imply perfection. Couples will still disagree. They will face stress, miscommunication, and moments of frustration. However, when emotional footing is equal, conflict does not threaten the foundation. Instead, it becomes an opportunity for understanding. Both partners approach challenges as teammates rather than opponents. They choose resolution over ego and repair over pride.

Time often reveals whether emotional equality truly exists. In the early stages of love, intensity can disguise imbalance. Enthusiasm feels mutual. Effort appears equal. But as routine settles in and novelty fades, the structure of the relationship becomes clearer. Who still initiates? Who still invests? Who still shows up consistently? Sustainable love requires sustained balance. It is built not merely on attraction, but on deliberate reciprocity. Standing on equal emotional grounds requires intentionality. It demands honest conversations about needs and expectations. It requires both partners to examine their habits — whether they withdraw during tension, avoid accountability, or rely on the other to carry the emotional weight. Emotional maturity is not about avoiding conflict; it is about handling it responsibly and returning, again and again, to shared ground.

Perhaps the greatest benefit of emotional equality is peace. There is no constant anxiety about where one stands. No guessing games about commitment. No fear that affection may suddenly disappear. Instead, there is stability. There is reassurance. There is mutual effort. In a world where relationships often blur the lines between attention and commitment, equality offers clarity. It reminds us that love should not feel like competition or performance. It should feel like partnership. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, they build something resilient. They build trust that does not fracture easily. They build respect that does not depend on mood. They build a connection rooted not only in passion but in balance. And in that balance, love finds its strength — not in who gives more, but in how both give fully.

By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi

Opinion

NDDC: Time To Illuminate Homes

Published

1 week ago

March 2, 2026

The Tide

Quote:“Twenty-five years on, the Niger Delta cannot celebrate illuminated streets while families sit in darkness. Development must begin inside the home — where children study, businesses grow, and lives are built — before it glows on the roadside.”

The Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) was established in 2000 with a clear and urgent mandate: to facilitate the rapid, even, and sustainable development of Nigeria’s oil-producing Niger Delta region. The creation of the Commission followed decades of agitation over environmental degradation, infrastructural neglect, and socio-economic marginalization in the region. Its core mandate included the development of roads, bridges, electricity, water supply, health facilities, education, housing, environmental remediation, and economic empowerment initiatives. At inception, expectations were high that the Commission would transform the Niger Delta into a model of regional development. Over the years, the NDDC has indeed implemented numerous projects across the nine Niger Delta states. Roads have been constructed and rehabilitated in several communities, easing transportation challenges.

Schools have been renovated, and new classroom blocks have been provided in underserved areas. Health centres have been built or upgraded, improving access to primary healthcare services. The Commission has also awarded scholarships to students, including foreign postgraduate scholarships, empowering thousands of youths academically.Skills acquisition and youth empowerment programmes have helped many young people gain vocational competencies.Through various interventions, the NDDC has contributed to job creation and local economic stimulation.Solar-powered street lighting projects have been widely implemented in urban and semi-urban communities. These streetlights have improved visibility at night and contributed to enhanced security in some areas. Markets, highways, and public spaces illuminated by solar lights have experienced extended business hours.

For these efforts, the Commission deserves acknowledgment and commendation. However, development must always align with foundational mandates and pressing grassroots realities. A growing concern among residents is that while streets are illuminated, many homes remain in darkness. Rural electrification and household power access remain inconsistent and inadequate across large parts of the region. In riverine and remote communities, families still rely on generators, kerosene lamps, or complete darkness after sunset. The irony of brightly lit streets juxtaposed with powerless homes cannot be ignored. Electricity at the household level directly impacts education, health, and small-scale enterprise. Students cannot effectively study at night without reliable indoor lighting.Families cannot preserve food or power essential appliances without stable electricity.

Micro and small businesses struggle to grow without dependable energy access. While street lighting enhances public aesthetics and security, it does not substitute for domestic electrification. The proverb “charity begins at home” is especially relevant in this context. True community development must first empower households before beautifying public spaces. The Commission’s original mandate emphasizes integrated and sustainable development, not isolated infrastructural gestures. Balanced development requires that energy interventions prioritize homes alongside streets. Solar technology presents a unique opportunity for decentralized household electrification in off-grid communities. Extending solar solutions to individual homes would have a transformative social impact. Home-based solar systems could power lights, fans, small appliances, and communication devices.

Such interventions would reduce poverty, improve living standards, and stimulate grassroots productivity. By broadening its energy focus, the Commission would better reflect the spirit of its founding legislation. This is not a call to abandon street lighting projects, which have their merits. Rather, it is an appeal for balance, inclusivity, and alignment with core developmental objectives. Strategic planning should ensure that rural electrification and household access form a central pillar of ongoing interventions. Community engagement and needs assessments can help determine priority areas for household solar deployment. Twenty-five years after its establishment, the NDDC stands at a reflective moment in its institutional journey. The people of the Niger Delta say: thank you for the efforts so far—but not very much—because true appreciation will come when development begins at home and radiates outward, not merely when streets shine while houses remain in darkness.

By: King Onunwor