Opinion

Christ, Medium Of Communication?

Published

12 years ago

February 21, 2014

The concept of prayer or communciation with Deity has
been miscontrued in christendom by many religious adherents. I can recall that at Mount Sinai, Prophet Moses was summoned to receive the Golden Rules in tablets of stones for the guidance of the children of Israel. In the said rules and regulations, the first two commandments read thus: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow thyself to them, nor serve them … “ Exodus 20 vs 3-6 (KJV).
Since the rebellion of Lucifer (Satan) against the government of Jehovah in heaven which brought about the holy war (Rev. 12 vs 7 -9) fought by the disloyal angels with the angels that were loyal to God’s instruction, Satan has been relentless in seducing God’s children to always go the wrong way in stark disobedience and opposition to what God says.
The first deception of the first couple in the Garden of Eden is living evidence. Satan said that it did not matter for they would not surely die which was against the explicit instructions of the Creator of the entire universe as contained in Genesis 3 vs 1-4. This singular act of deception is ravaging the inhabitants of the earth even in christendom, hence the belief of reincarnation and immortality of the soul that do not have any scriptural background should be discarded forthwith – Ecclesiastes 9 vs 5,10. Follow the right things always and give no room for satanic influences.
The Christian religion is about the life, teachings and practices of Jesus Christ as shown amongst the Bereans who searched the Scriptures daily in order to know and understand the truth of salvation. In Acts of the Apostles, the Bereans were highly commended for their zealousness to know the truth – Acts 17 v 11. Of course, Jesus Christ, whom every professed Christian tends to follow emphatically, asserted that nobody will be free except he or she knows the truth. Invariably, this is an indication that anybody without the full knowledge and understanding of the truth as contained in the Holy Scriptures is in darkness – see John 5 v 39 and 8 v 32 respectively.
It is true that a professing Christian would in no doubt live a prayerful lifestyle in order to survive the whirls of the devil as well as being in close communication and good relationship with God as outlined in 1 st Thessalonians 5 vs 17,19 which says “pray without ceasing … quench not the Spirit.” However, throughout the synoptic gospels, there is no single chapter or verse authorising that communication or prayer with God should be channeled through any other medium, be it prophets, angels, saints of any age, loved ones like the Virgin Mary (Jesus’ mother) or whoever than to pray directly to our Heavenly Father according to the injunction in Mathew 6 v 9 which supports the first two commandments handed down to Prophet Moses at Mount Sinai as indicated above.
The fact is that the wonderful sacrifice of Jesus at the stake with His precious blood as well as being our High Priest in the Heavenly sanctuary, it is expedient that at the end of the Christian supplication or communion with the Father, it should only be terminated or concluded through Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour to make it very authentic because He is pleading and interceding in our stead before His Father in the sanctuary pitched in Heaven and not earthly sanctuary which came to an end with the cruxifiction of Christ on the Cross of Calvary.
Jesus alone has the right and authority to scrutinize our prayers through the aid of the Holy Spirit to the throne of Grace and not through any mortal being, whether alive or dead. Jesus is God in human flesh while on earth (John 1 vs 1 & 14). He is the only medium of communication with heaven through the ministration of the Holy Spirit.
It is very curious to believe that the Mother of Jesus could be a medium of communication between mankind and God. At this juncture, one may posit: What is the role and function of our Saviour Jesus Christ in this context? In fact, the misconception of medium of appropriate communication with God is as a result of the scheming of the arch-deceiver (Satan the Devil) who is always thwarting the plans of God and does not want people to acquire the true knowledge of the word of God for appropriate and adequate enlightenment. No wonder, Prophet Hosea in his prophetic writings in Chapter 4 v 6, lamented that “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; not necessarily that but rather they had rejected knowledge.”
Taking a retrospective view at the sacrificial or Levitical era, there were channels of communication with God through ceremonial/sacrificial services before the first advent of the Messiah, the God-man who was born to chart a new course of doing things in His righteousness. Frankly speaking, before the Cross, the then religious leaders were focused and highly honoured as infallible as well as ex-cathedral (i.e. Vicar of Christ) on earth through whom the people would obtain repentance, forgiveness of sin by penance and prayers are channeled to. All these were handwriting of ordinances that was against Christian ethics which ended at the Cross with the sacrifice of Jesus as He lamented “It is finished.” Those ceremonial or sacrificial activities were brought to an end as you read in the book of Deuteronomy 31 v 26 and Colossians 2 v 14.
It has been advised that for proper understanding of the Scriptures, it should be compared precept by precept, line by line, to make a contrast for adequate knowledge of a particular issue because the Bible is its own interpreter, according to Isaiah 28 v 10 . During the consolation of Jesus to His beloved while He hung on the Cross of Calvary, He made a remarkable assertion as recorded by one of His erudite disciples in John 19 vs 26,27 thus: “Woman, behold thy son,” while to John, He said “Son behold thy mother.” How do you read, how do you understand.
Inasmuch as it is written “honour thy father and thy mother so that your days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee” as enshrined in the fifth commandment (Exodus 20 v 12), it does not portray or give notion of worshipping them in place of God which may tantamount to worshipping idols or having other gods before the Almighty God.
Similarly, prayer should not be channeled to God through any other means except through Jesus only.
Apostle Paul cautioned his obedient servant (Timothy) in the Lord that time shall come when people would not endure sound doctrines, but shall follow after their own lusts and heap to themselves teachers with itching ears who will turn away their ears from the truth and rather turn unto fables or falsehood (2nd Timothy 4 vs 3, 4).
Those who erroneously pray through the Virgin Mary should desist from such practice(s) and do that which is right – 1st John 2 v 1. Jesus said “I am the way, the truth and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me (John 14 v 6). This statement was expatiated by Apostle Peter that there is no salvation in any other name beside the name of Jesus (Acts 4 v 12). Therefore, he who has ears let him/her adhere to the praying principles of the Master of all and not through any unathorised medium.

Ominyanwa is a public affairs analyst.

Goddey Ominyanwa

Opinion

Kudos Gov Fubara

Published

4 days ago

January 2, 2026

The Tide

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area. This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.

The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people. He said, “our isolation is over.” That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.

The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.

Samuel Ebiye

Opinion

… And It Came To Pass

Published

4 days ago

January 2, 2026

The Tide

Quote:“Leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation.”

Tell it in Rivers State, publish it in the streets of Port Harcourt, so the daughters of the State could rejoice, and the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph and know that Fubara is not vindictive”. And it came to pass that Rivers State emerged from one of the most delicate chapters in its political journey, the period of emergency rule that spanned from March 18 to September 18, 2025. It was a season that tested institutions, strained loyalties, and exposed the fragile balance between power and principle. During that time, the suspended Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara DSSRS, was widely believed to have suffered not only political setbacks but personal betrayal, allegedly from some top civil servants within the state apparatus. These were individuals expected to uphold neutrality and professionalism, yet were accused in public opinion of taking sides against the very government they served.

As the emergency rule ended and Governor Fubara resumed office, expectations were shaped less by policy and more by emotion. Many assumed that revenge would quietly find expression through governance. The loudest suspicion centered on the 2025 Christmas bonus of ?100,000 traditionally paid to each worker. The thinking was simple and cynical: a wounded governor would surely withhold goodwill. Some voices even mocked workers openly hoping that the governor would refuse to pay the bonus. To them, denial of the bonus would serve as proof of political strength and justified retaliation. In reality, such thinking revealed a troubling desire to see governance reduced to personal vendetta. Yet, it came to pass, the governor chose a path that confounded suspicion. Against all expectations, the 2025 Christmas bonus was paid.

That single decision quietly but firmly reframed the narrative. It showed a leader focused on governance rather than grudges, on institutional continuity rather than emotional satisfaction. The payment was not a favor, nor was it a concession; it was a statement that public administration must rise above personal injury. By honoring the bonus, Governor Fubara demonstrated that leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation. He made it clear that workers’ welfare would not become collateral damage in political disagreements. This action also served as a moral rebuke to those who celebrated division and hoped for punishment. Governance is not validated by the suffering of workers, nor is leadership strengthened by withholding entitlements. At the same time, the issue of alleged sycophancy and betrayal within the civil service cannot be brushed aside. If proven, such conduct deserves firm, lawful, and institutional correction. Civil servants are bound by duty to the state, not to political conspiracies or shifting loyalties.

However, justice must never be confused with revenge. The strength of governance lies in correcting wrongs without destroying the system itself. Governor Fubara’s restraint suggested an understanding that the future of Rivers State mattered more than settling scores. For workers, this moment carried an important lesson. Celebration should be rooted in good governance, not in the expectation of another’s downfall. Rejoicing in rumors of denial or punishment undermines the very stability that protects workers’ welfare. Public service thrives where professionalism, mutual respect, and accountability are upheld. Pettiness, gossip, and political scheming only weaken institutions and erode trust. History often remembers leaders not for the crises they inherit, but for the character they display in response. In paying the 2025 Christmas bonus, Governor Fubara chose legacy over impulse, maturity over malice.

And so, it came to pass that focus defeated revenge, governance triumphed over bitterness, and Rivers State was reminded that true leadership is proven when restraint is expected least but delivered most. Beyond the symbolism of the Christmas bonus lies a deeper question about the kind of political culture Rivers State intends to cultivate in the years ahead. Periods of emergency rule, anywhere in the world, often leave behind residues of suspicion, fear, and silent realignments. Institutions do not emerge untouched; individuals recalibrate loyalties, some out of conviction, others out of self-preservation. What distinguishes stable democracies from fragile ones is not the absence of such moments, but the discipline with which leadership manages their aftermath. River.

King Onunwor

Opinion

That Withdrawal of Police Orderlies From VIPs

Published

4 days ago

January 2, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”Balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk in a country where the majority of citizens are still under-protected.”

The Presidential announcement on the removal of police orderlies from persons in authority and their relations ( Very Important Persons ) last month came as a relief to many Nigerians who felt deprived of one major role of government ; security of lives and property.The higher population of Nigerians missed needed security because the VIPs and the VVIPs kept retinue of Police Officers totalling over 100 ,000 to themselves and their family members as if they are all that matter while some communities under attack of terrorists have no single unit of police station located there in. While many hailed the announcement , some said perhaps the government has just woken up to her major responsibility of securing the lives and property of all citizens while many expressed indifference on the note that it may be one of those pronouncements which come only in words but no action .Many keep their fingers crossed watching how it will play out , how Mr President will go about the implementation of the seemingly dicey policy .

Benjamin Franklin said “well said is better than well done ” It is sufficient today to say that many Nigerians including me are still waiting and watching to see how well and how long this return of the Police service to the ordinary people will go . Wishing hopes will not be crashed , It is note worthy, that the recent complaints by the VIPs of being exposed to attacks may in a way affect the action on implementation. Recently, at Senate plenary , another worrisome angle came up as Senator Abdul Ningi coming through a motion disclosed that he had only one police officer attached to him ( his office ) and that the officer was recalled the week before following Mr President’s directive . Senator Ningi said the withdrawal exposed him to high risks but underscored the angle that while his orderly was recalled , many other politicians , men and women in authority, business concerns foreigners and even children of some VIPs are still enjoying retinue of police protection ( officially attached to them ).

It’s note worthy also that the Deputy Senate President , Distinguished Senator Jibrin Barau, who presided over the session revealed that the leadership of both chambers are already in discussion with President Tinubu on the need to exempt the law makers from the new policy . Senator Ningi may not be wrong . After all he emphasized he is okay provided that the removal of the Police Orderlies be done across board . Senator Barau noted that talks are on over the issue of law makers’ in line with international practice . Further details from the Presidency noted that Presiding officers will retain their police officers , others would have Civil Defense officers ( NSCDC) as orderlies while any other VIP who feels he or she deserves personal police protection should get clearance from his office . In the midst of all issues weighing in on the proper implementation , it becomes necessary to bear in mind that the decision hinges on the realization that Nigeria has peculiar security issues (of kidnappings, banditry, and terrorism.) and that majority of Nigerians are under protected.

More so, that if well implemented, Police officers will focus on core duties; even as 30,000 new police officers are to recruited to enhance security .That implementation must be made in a way that leaves no room.for selective treatment loss of confidence and controversies. Looking at previous attempts of implementation of this policy gives faint hope as several attempts consistently failed . Former IGPs like Tafa Balogun (2003), Ogbonnaya Onovo (2009), and Ibrahim Idris (2018) tried the policy but all failed due to political resistance from various angles. All the failed attempts were tied to lack of political will mostly due to the fact that the directives came from police chiefs, not the president. Selective Enforcement was another killer to the policy as partial implementation met resistance and later reversal . Egbetokun (2023) and Adamu (2020) saw minimal impact.

Further more entrenched corruption in the system saw Politicians and VIPs quietly regain police escorts due to ‘transactional economics”and pressure. Worse still the mindset of the police officers withdrawn didn’t help the policy Underpaid police prioritize VIP duties for extra benefits. Many wish President Tinubu’s move can break this cycle. As at today, he still insists the move is non-negotiable while stressing collaboration with states to upgrade training facilities. As citizens look forward to success of the policy without undue exposure of both sides, balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk. Talk fades ; action echoes. How the Presidency implements this policy. has much to tell on the governments stand on national / community security , choice of priority and the ability to stand uncomprised . The known goal is clear: The outcome is not yet certain. Fingers crossed , we await . Definitely , time will tell.

By: Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi.

s State stood at such a crossroads in September 2025. The temptation to rule with a long memory and a heavy hand was real. Yet, the choice made signaled a preference for healing over hardening. Leadership after crisis demands more than administrative competence; it requires moral clarity.

Governor Fubara’s decision reminded the state that authority is not best exercised through silent punishment or selective generosity. Rather, it is strengthened when rules remain rules, irrespective of personal injury. By keeping faith with workers, the government preserved an essential firewall between politics and public service. That firewall, once breached, turns governance into a battlefield where livelihoods become weapons. Rivers State narrowly avoided that descent. In doing so, it affirmed that institutions must outlive tempers, and governance must not mirror the bitterness of political seasons. This moment also invites sober introspection within the civil service itself. Allegations of partisanship, if left unresolved, corrode professionalism and weaken public confidence. A civil service that drifts into political camps loses its moral authority and operational effectiveness.

Therefore, reform, where necessary, should be guided by due process, transparency, and institutional review—not whispers, witch-hunts, or mob verdicts. Accountability strengthens systems when it is fair; it destroys them when it is arbitrary. The restraint shown by the executive places a corresponding burden on administrative leadership to restore discipline, neutrality, and pride in public service. For the wider political class and the commentariat, the episode serves as a caution against normalizing cruelty as strategy. The eagerness with which some anticipated workers’ suffering revealed a dangerous appetite for scorched-earth politics. When governance becomes a spectator sport where pain is cheered and deprivation is weaponized, society inches toward moral exhaustion. Rivers State has seen enough turbulence to know that stability is not sustained by triumphalism, but by restraint.

The lesson is simple yet profound: power is fleeting, but institutions endure; leaders pass, but precedents remain. In the end, the payment of the 2025 Christmas bonus was more than a fiscal act—it was a civic statement. It told workers they were not expendable. It told political actors that revenge would not be policy. And it told the state that maturity in leadership is not weakness, but strength under control. In a climate where many expected fire, restraint prevailed; where bitterness was predicted, balance emerged. Thus, Rivers State was offered a rare reminder that governance, at its best, is an act of discipline, and leadership, at its highest, is the courage to rise above provocation.