Connect with us

Politics

Buhari Did Not Authorise My Arrest – Tunde Thompson

Published

on

Tunde Thompson

Tunde Thompson

He was one of the two
journalists that were jailed under the draconian Decree No 4, promulgated and executed in 1984 by the Federal Military Government of Nigeria headed by General Mohammadu Buhari. Today, Tunde Thompson is on the media team of President Buhari and is a card carrying member of the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC.
Opaka Dokubo spoke with the iconic journalist in Asaba, Delta State where Mr Thompson was the guest speaker at the public lecture organised by the Delta State Council of the NUJ to wrap up their 2015 press week. excerpts:

Being on the media team of President Buhari
Well, all I know is that there is nothing between me and the now president Muhammadu Buhari, it was the state. The state decided that A and B had written what they should not have written and there was a security law that you can be locked up for six months in the first instance, there fore we should be subjected to that punishment.
There are impressions that the diplomatic stories that I wrote which Nduka partly contributed to because I gave my manuscript to him when I was travelling, for my grandmothers’ burial. What I’m saying is that there was some security risk in all that but those are not issues to start talking about now. I was not aware of those security risks.
It was also simple as saying, you said you were going to run a government of national unity, you have named eight ambassadors and six or seven of them are from the north”. When I wrote about those who were named high commissioners and ambassadors, I was not thinking about state of origin. But may be some people queried the government about most of the people coming from one part of the country. May be that’s why they took it  seriously.
But I was surprised because as a senior diplomatic correspondent, I was defending my country. I remember I was in one embassy and they were about Nigeria closing its mission there and I said to them that diplomacy is also business and a government can decide to close its embassy if the returns were not encouraging.
Reconcile Buhari the military dictator and Buhari the democrat
I don’t even think that Buhari was a military dictator, I don’t think he was. I was one of those who supported some of the things he did, especially the War Against Indiscipline.
Nobody can tell me that it was dictatorship to decide that we should adopt the queen culture, we should learn to tend our environment such that there will be sanitation consciousness.
Like now, some people helped themselves to too much of the country’s money and the rest of us that the leaders represented under Buhari were not happy about it.
Circumstance, can smile on you, you don’t know whether you will survive or not, but you have to be a man. The coup leaders told Buhari that he should be the leader because they saw in him the qualities of one who would be a head of state of Nigeria as a military Leader, the same thing that the APC saw in him and decided to make him a presidential candidate. It was not easy, it was a big battle but this is one who has been exposed, he has had experiences in various aspects of our national life.
There is nothing you can hold on to so much to say that he was a dictator.
Do you see him performing as much as he did under the military?
The man has shown you that he can perform because the previous government  did a lot of bad bad things like Fela would say. If you were to find out how much of Nigeria’s wealth are in private hands now, may be 80% minimum…
If you were to find out why even the East / West Road wasn’t done, you’ll know that the reasons were very very uncomplimentary. There was not enough commitment to patriotism and achievement of excellence.
I 2011, I voted for Jonathan but when put side by side Buhari, I said no way, I will never vote for Jonathan where Buhari was a candidate and when I saw that they were trying to malign him, ridicule him, embarrass him, put him into irrelevance, and they were using Decree No 4 (of 1984) to discourage his participation or even standing as a presidential candidate, I said to them, look its 31 years, he may have proved that he is a patriot, he has struggled three times to be president of this country, almost like Abraham Lincolu of the United States of America who ran eleven times. The man has tried and all the allegation you’re making about him, you can’t even prove them. I have forgiven the man, So those talking about Decree 4, that’s 31 years ago, let us see the quality in him that even make him have confidence in himself to want to stand as a candidate. You have to have confidence to be able to stand three, four times to be chosen. And he didn’t succeed before because all the parties under which he participated before didn’t have the national spread. The PDP founders were very clever, very smart in their thinking, they needed a party that had a spread across Nigeria. That’s where  they got their initial advantage. All other parties didn’t think that way. They didn’t think of a national presence in leadership. PDP took that into consideration from the word go.
Those people who decided that APC advantages which PDP had are the best thinkers in Nigerian politics of the modern age and they should be appreciated. Even God almighty inspired them into thinking that way.
As someone who had been on the receiving end of an anti-press, anti-freedom legislation, what do you  make of  the frivolous petitions bill  in the senate.
I support any attempt to check indiscipline, to check lack of ethical consciousness in the practice of any profession including Journalisms. Me that you see here, somebody had written on the internet that I had died about ten, fifteen years ago. I was not interested in pursuing the matter by suing them or something. But I had an experience of what the present legislators are trying to check.
You’re a journalists but you’re not supposed to be reckless; you’re a journalist, you’re not supposed to make false allegations; you’re a journalists, your duty is not to run any person down or to try to put anyone into disrepute at all. So self censorship still remains a preferable way of getting journalists to behave in the right way. You have to censor yourself, you have to know the rules of journalism. You’re not supposed to behave like a warrior who is out to spoil everything for the opponent. No. the journalists is not a politician. It is not a bad idea for some legislators at the federal level, at the state level to say let’s check it because you wont know it until it hits you.
Nevertheless, we can never return to Decree No 4 level. It was people who never wanted government to remain popular and to stop critics from hiting out at the government which Buhari headed that misled the administration at the ministry of Justice level.
Those who act in the name of government are different from government because they sell ideas to government and government is too busy to think about the ideas that are sold to them. And even the president, the ministers, commissioners may not have been informed or be aware of the intricacies of  some of the moves that are being made or contemplated. So, Decree 4 may be one of them,
Even Buhari, I never saw a place where he signed that Thompson should be arrested for writing about this. All I know is that they did not give us a chance to even make self defence. That’s not good. I will like to advise government not to conclude that anybody is guilty without even listening to the person.
I will advise (the senators ) to take it easy, not to think about all these draconian laws that are meant to keep people in check.
Excuse me, no condition is permanent. If you make a law now to protect  yourself as public servants from unjust criticism, are you going to be there forever? So, its better to make a law without even thinking of your own personal benefit. I hear that some of the senators, after the saraki matter started, they were talking about looking immunity law. The president, the Vice President, the governors, I don’t even know about the  deputies, that can enjoy immunity. The President of the senate, the speaker of the House are part of the people.
They must talk to the people and the people will talk to them. So they cant be above any law. As for the citizens that they want to check who are journalist, I would say all this provision of putting people in jail for two years
…they just have to take it easy. They have to be less ambitious in the prosecutorial range of the bill so that they can win some public support. A law maker is only as popular as he makes himself and his laws. Why should we make laws that will put us in a ridicule? Are we the only country that are exposed to the new media?
So, let us make laws against malicious of character, against factless reporting.
Your report must be factual, your opinionation must be based evidence acquired though careful investigation. I am saying that if  you have to stop those things, you don’t have to put somebody in jail for two years or make all sorts of demands that will give the impression that you ‘re a draconinan legislator.  They don’t even know that a legislature that wants to be draconian will not be aided by  a president who wants to be democratic because the president does not have to sign a bill that is outrageous in its aspiration.
We should not allow people who have narrow constructions in their minds to make laws that will put all of us in a ridiculous context within the contemporary world.
Even as a member  of the APC, how do you see the state of opposition politics in Nigeria?
It is not right for opposition parties just to keep criticising everything, running down people in authority just because  they want to be noticed as being in opposition.  There are times you have to be sincere to yourself.  Imagine the election that has been concluded in Kogi State now, eeh they’re going to rig, eeh everybody is trying to rig…
They accused the party in authority at the centre of wanting to do one evil or the other.  That’s too much.  Some of the accusations are untested, they’are unsubstantiated.  We’ve finished Kogi and we have had Bayelsa and you can see that the rivalry in Bayelsa has always been there.  I can say, undemocratically so because some of them decided to put their trust in weapons of mass destruction instead of social intercourse, democratic interrlationship, persuation, convincing people that you’re a better candidate debates and so on.

Continue Reading

Politics

How Akande Lied Against Me Over Bola Ige’s Case – Ladoja

Published

on

Former Governor of Oyo State, Senator Rasheed Ladoja, has dismissed the claim by former National Leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief Bisi Akande, that he has crucial information regarding the murder of Chief Bola Ige as a complete falsehood.

In a recent interview, Chief Akande also said Senator Ladoja entered a no case submission for the suspects accused of assassinating the ex-Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice.

But the ex-governor has denied the allegation, saying old age has probably affected the memory of the former Osun State Governor to remember what happened during the period.

Senator Ladoja wondered why Chief Akande, who said he knew many things about the assassination that he would not disclose, did not tell the public what exactly surrounded the killing of the former AGF on December 23, 2001.

Senator Ladoja, next in the hierarchy to the Olubadan of Ibadan, said this when speaking with reporters in his Bodija residence in Ibadan.

 

Speaking in an interview with Edmund Obilo, Chief Akande suggested that Senator Ladoja might have important information about late Chief Ige’s killing.

He alleged that Chief Ige was killed by the government and described his death as a “state murder” — but never affirmed a specific person who committed the crime.

Chief Akande claimed that Senator Ladoja withdrew a case related to the murder that had initially been pursued by his predecessor, former Governor Lam Adesina.

“I was the chief security officer of Osun State at the time, not Oyo State. Lam Adesina was the chief security officer of Oyo State and he went to court and the governor that took over from him, Ladoja, withdrew the case from court. He might be able to tell you more, he might know more than I do know,” Chief Akande said.

“There are many things that die with people. I know Lam Adesina went to court over the matter, and I also know his successor, (Rashidi) Ladoja, withdrew the case. Ask Ladoja; he would know more about Bola Ige’s death”, he added.

The All Progressives Congress (APC) chieftain also expressed regret that ex-governor Adesina had confided in him about certain details he could no longer disclose.

Chief Akande noted that key figures, including the former Oyo state governor, who could have shed more light on the case, had passed away.

“Because there are many things you don’t want to tell the public. I don’t want to tell anybody. Now Bola Ige is dead, and Lam Adesina too is dead, so who will be my witness? Nobody,” he added.

Addressing journalists at his residence in Ibadan, Senator Ladoja described Chief Akande’s claims as false.

He said that the case was pursued up to the Supreme Court during his tenure, and denied ever having withdrawn any charges.

“I didn’t withdraw the case; my government didn’t withdraw any case. The case was even prosecuted till apex court, Chief Akande lied against me. This is not the first time people said he lied; someone like Baba Adebanjo even said he lied in his book.

“We are not all happy as a result of Chief Bola Ige’s death, and we are all concerned about his death. I was very close to Chief Bola Ige while alive”, he said.

In 2016, former President Muhammadu Buhari ordered that the investigation into the murder be reopened, but there has been little progress since.

Continue Reading

Politics

Grassroots Governance: Otu Signs Cross River Local Government Amendment Bill Into Law

Published

on

Governor Bassey Otu of Cross River State has signed into law the amended Cross River Local Government Law, a significant legislative milestone aimed at enhancing grassroots governance and service delivery in the state.

A statement signed by Chief Press Secretary to the governor, Mr NSA Gill, said Governor Otu commended the State House of Assembly for its proactive and people-centered legislative work while speaking at the bill signing ceremony which held at his temporary office in Calabar.

The governor emphasized that the amended law would strengthen representation at the grassroots level and drive meaningful development.

“In no distant time, the difference at the grassroots level will be clear,” the governor assured.

Reflecting on the political landscape, Governor Otu expressed satisfaction with the Assembly’s status as a fully All Progressives Congress (APC) legislature.

He noted that with the party now fully in control, unity and collaboration were imperative to support President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope agenda.

In his remarks, the Speaker of the Cross River State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Elvert Ayambem, highlighted the transformative impact of the amendments.

He stated that the revised law would accelerate economic development, encourage broader participation in governance, and enhance service delivery at the grassroots level.

Some of the key amendments to the Principal Law include: Section 4(4) – increases the number of departments from seven to twelve, allowing for a more structured and efficient administration; Section 5(2) – adjustments in percentages of funds allocated to key Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs) to enhance effectiveness and efficiency; Section 20(1) – entrusts Vice Chairmen of councils with oversight on humanitarian affairs, peace and conflict resolution, border and boundary matters, as well as sports; Section 21, which mandates that all appointments into Executive Councils must reflect Federal Character, ensuring balanced representation.

Sections 22(3) and 22(6) – enhance the offices of the Secretary of Council and the Clerk of the Legislative Council with additional staff; Sections 22(a) and 22(b) – provide for the statutory appointment of up to 50 persons per council and introduce the role of Ward Relations Officers, who will serve as Special Assistants in each Council Ward; as well as elevation of Heads of Local Government Administration (HOLGAs) to now have the same rank as Permanent Secretaries at the state level, recognizing their critical role in local governance.

Continue Reading

Politics

Anambra LP Aspirant Advocates Security Details Withdrawal From Politicians

Published

on

An aspirant of the Labour Party (LP) for the vacant seat of the Anambra South Senatorial District, Mr Chidi Amamgbo, has advised the Federal Government to withdraw security details attached to politicians and other very important persons (VIPs) in the country.
According to Mr Amamgbo, who is a U.S.-based Nigerian-born lawyer: “All prominent personalities, from governors to senators, House of Representatives members, and other notable public office holders need to be stripped of police protection.

“Knowing this, stakeholders will quickly show commitment to internal security by overhauling the system if they no longer have access to police escorts”.

Speaking during an interactive session with journalists in Awka, the Anambra State capital, Mr Amamgbo said the measure would help the government develop the right strategies to tackle insecurity and make the country safe again.

“It’s either we rise together or fall together. It’s either we provide security for everybody, or we cannot have our own mini-army while everybody else dies.

“The security situation in the country currently requires a law that will make it impossible for security agents to be assigned to wealthy people,” he said.

He advocated an upward review of security votes to governors, especially in states “where insecurity has become so pronounced that people now live in fear and hardly run their businesses or sleep in peace.”

Mr Amamgbo added, “Security votes allocated to governors should not be seen as pocket money. A committee made up of well-meaning citizens, who are professionals in their various fields, should be constituted to handle the funds, ensure proper utilisation, and enforce accountability.”

He also mentioned that Anambra South was worse hit by the prevailing state of insecurity in the country such as kiddnapping, cultism and sit-at-home, among others ravaging the state.

According to him, for several years, Anambra South, particularly Ihiala, Nnewi South, and Orumba South, have been under siege by non-state actors.

“They have turned our once-thriving communities into theatres of war and bloodshed. Our people, who are predominantly traders, industrialists, farmers, and professionals, now live in perpetual anxiety, unable to go about their lawful businesses,” Mr Amamgbo lamented.

He stated that the unfortunate development had led to the destruction of businesses, economic downturn and displacement of families from their ancestral homes.

He also said that the security challenge had broken law and order, with security agencies stretched beyond their limits.

Mr Amamgbo, therefore, called on the state government to step up efforts to flush out criminals in Anambra South.

Continue Reading

Trending