Opinion
Any Need For Designated Smoking Areas?
It cannot be disputed that while smoking is optional,
breathing is not. Ban on smoking in certain public places has therefore been recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to protect non-smokers from the harmful effects of second-hand smoke which include heart diseases, stroke etc.
A Global Health Observatory data reveals that second-hand smoke is one of the most harmful and widespread exposures in the indoor environment. It notes that more than a third of the population are regularly exposed to the harmful effects of smoke with fatalities put at 600,000 per year, and accounting for at least 1% of the global burden of disease.
Because of this, hundreds of countries have introduced laws banning smoking in indoor places as the easiest way to reduce their health care costs.
While the tobacco companies operating in Nigeria bask in the euphoria that the Tobacco Control Act 2015 signed by former president, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan did not outrightly ban smoking in all public places, public health advocates believe the legislation has not gone far enough.
This argument finds meaning when viewed from the prism that Nigerians cannot forget in a hurry the barrage of groups claiming to promote smokers’ rights during the Public Hearings on the National Tobacco Control Bill (now Tobacco Control Act 2015) between 2014 and May 2015 when the law finally got the presidential signature. These groups, believed to be fronts for tobacco industry operators, claimed that introduction of Designated Smoking Areas (DSAs) will guarantee the rights of smokers without infringing on the rights of non-smokers.
Experts, however, discountenance the so-called smokers groups as role players of the tobacco corporations only interested in sustaining their profits by maintaining a stranglehold on addicted smokers. On an expanded scale, it is not a deniable fact that, the tobacco industry is in cahoots with the hospitality industry, promoting a lie that the hotels, restaurants and other places frequented by fun seekers will lose customers if smoking is disallowed in such places. Tobacco companies are known sponsors of restaurant owners’ associations which are deployed as fronts to campaign against the ban on smoke-free public places. The industry does this despite the growing body of evidence that smoking is harmful not just to smokers’ health, but secondary smokers as well.
Secret tobacco industry documents show they are ready to spend millions of dollars promoting films where actors are seen smoking to make the habit seem hype. In one of such documents, a leading tobacco corporation is said to have considered investing in a f2.25m ($4.2m) action film with a heroine who smoked, for distribution in Europe as part of an aggressive marketing campaign, according to an article published in the European Journal of Public Health.
In our own Lagos which passed a legislation in 2014 prohibiting smoking in certain public places, public health advocates raised the alarm about attempts by British American Tobacco Nigeria (BATN) to confuse the public through several meetings with implementing agencies of the legislation including the Nigeria Police. The meetings were said to have served as platforms for promotion of DSAs and redefinition of smoke-free environments.
These attempts do not, however, erode global studies that point to smoke-free public places as influencing reduction in demand for tobacco by creating an environment where smoking becomes increasingly more difficult. While the tobacco industry advocates limited smoke-free places with DSAs obviously for sustaining profits, medical experts insist total ban on smoking in public places is the way to go as they playa critical role in helping to shift social norms away from the acceptance of smoking in everyday life. Smoking bans has been confirmed by the WHO as an important element in reducing smoking rates and promoting positive health outcomes.
Researches from the United States and Europe show that banning smoking in public places have helped to cut premature births by 10 per cent.
Ireland is noted as the first country in the world to have instituted a nationwide comprehensive smoke- free workplaces law. The law which came into force on 29 March 2004 expands on an existing outlaw of smoking in public places which began in 1988 and has been enforced in public buildings, hospitals, public pharmacies, schools, banking halls, cinemas, public hairdressing premises, and restaurant kitchens, part of all restaurants, on public transport, aircraft and buses, among others.
On 1 July 2009, Ireland prohibited in-store tobacco advertising and displays of tobacco products at retail outlets and new controls on tobacco vending machines.
Following this successful example, Norway and Italy also did same. Britain, Portugal and Sweden, have drafted plans to establish similar laws.
These countries latch on Article 8 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTe) which recommends that Parties to the treaty adopt effective legislative measures “providing for protection from exposure to tobacco smoke in indoor workplaces, public transport, indoor public places and, as appropriate, other public places.”
The Guidelines state that” approaches other than 100 per cent smoke free laws environments, including ventilation, air filtration and the use of designated smoking areas … have repeatedly shown to be ineffective and there is conclusive evidence, scientific and otherwise, that engineering approaches do not protect against exposure to tobacco smoke.”
As of this date, a host of countries have introduced similar laws, prompting the question: If progressive nations have discarded DSAs successfully to safeguard the wellness of their citizens, why can’t Nigeria do it?
It will be worthwhile that the provision in the Tobacco Control Act which permits DSAs in all outdoor public places, work places and on public transport is reviewed to conform to the emerging global standards that has the nod of the WHO. The overall benefits to this nation comes in form of improved work productivity, reduced risk of fire in areas with explosive hazards; and an incentive for smokers to quit can surely not be ignored.
Adelabu wrote in from Lagos
Felix Adelabu
Valentine’s Day, February 14, is one of those occasions that evoke mixed reactions from different people. For some, it is a magical day filled with love, romance, and grand gestures. For others, it is an over-commercialised event that puts unnecessary pressure on relationships and individuals. Personally, I have a balanced perspective on Valentine’s Day—I appreciate the sentiment behind it, but I also recognise its drawbacks. At its core, Valentine’s Day is about celebrating love, which is a beautiful concept. Love, in its many forms—romantic, platonic, familial—is worth recognizing and cherishing. In a fast-paced world where people are constantly busy, having a designated day to express affection and appreciation for loved ones can be meaningful. It serves as a reminder to nurture relationships and make time for those who matter most. For many couples, it is an opportunity to rekindle romance, spend quality time together, and create cherished memories.
However, Valentine’s day celebration has left a sour taste in many marriages and relationships. On this day some years ago, my friend’s five-year-old marriage crashed due to irreconcilable differences between her and her husband which resulted from Valentine’s Day celebration. The man was alleged to have spent the “Lovers Day” in a hotel with another woman, an accusation he denied. There followed accusations and counter-accusations and a series of problems that culminated in divorce. Just like my friend, many people have ugly stories to tell about Valentine’s Day. Many couples have had fights on Valentine’s Day when one of them did not buy a nice enough gift or worse still forgets to buy a gift. Many people, especially the young ones have had to do all kinds of unspeakable things to raise money for the event. All these negative stories have made many wonder if the day is worth celebrating.
Valentine’s Day started out well. It is a very old and religious celebration centred around Saint Valentine. Stories have it that Emperor Claudius II of the Roman Empire decided that young men should be soldiers, so he outlawed marriage. Claudius handed down this decree believing that soldiers would be distracted and unable to concentrate on fighting if they were married or engaged. Valentine, a Catholic Priest, defied the emperor and secretly performed marriage ceremonies. He was thrown into prison and put to death on February 14. Valentine believed in the power of love. He identified with couples that were genuinely in love and paid the supreme prize for his love for others. Valentine’s Day was therefore set aside for the exchange of gifts with loved ones, friends, relatives and others.
Today the meaning of Valentine’s Day is gone because society rewrote it. With all the radio and television and social media hype the day is enjoying, as well as all the activities up in many cities for the event, it is obvious the real meaning of the day is being misused. Many have argued that various love activities on the night of Valentine’s Day are capable of luring youth into fornication, alcoholism and other social vices, and are big threats to the lives of the younger generation. As a matter of fact, many young people are taking advantage of this day to carry out all sorts of immoral acts. Many get pregnant, relationships are broken, many contact dreadful diseases like HIV/AIDS and the future of many is shattered. Valentine’s Day is certainly not meant to encourage people particularly the youth to engage in inappropriate sex and other forms of immorality. History did not tell us that St Valentine was a fornicator. So, it is absurd associating Valentine’s Day with sexual promiscuity.
Meanwhile, the emphasis on romance can make those who are single feel left out, as if their happiness is dependent on having a partner. In reality, love comes in many forms, and self-love is just as important as romantic relationships. Instead of seeing Valentine’s Day as a day only for couples, it can be an opportunity to celebrate love in a broader sense—spending time with loved ones, practising self-care, or simply appreciating life. I think for Valentine’s Day celebration to make more meaning in our lives as individuals and as a society, we must have to do things right. Let us use this day of love to celebrate all the people in our lives. This is what Valentine’s Day should really be like, seizing the opportunity to tell the people we love that they are special to us and actually making time to do something about it. It should be an opportunity to strengthen family ties and friendships rather than just focusing on romantic relationships.
The point of this day is not to indulge in immoral acts in the name of love or ruin your relationship over material things. The point of Valentine’s Day is, or at least should be, to appreciate one another. We are expected to use this date to pay tribute to love, this universal human value that transcends geographic, religious and cultural challenges. There is no doubt that when such selfless, true love is expressed to one another there will be peace in our families and the country in general, especially when neighbourly love is practised not only on Valentine’s Day but every day. Churches, Non-Governmental Organisations, states and federal ministries in charge of youth affairs are encouraged to emulate the former Archbishop of Lagos, Anthony Cardinal Olubunmi, in Okojie who usually gathered youths on Valentine’s Day and taught them the essence of the day and also engaged them meaningfully. Youths need to be occupied with important, useful activities like charity work, visit to the needy. This will enable them to appreciate and love others and at the same time make them better citizens.
Valentine’s Day should be redefined beyond romantic relationships. Some organisations, schools and individuals use the occasion to engage in charity work, visiting orphanages, hospitals, and less privileged communities to spread love in a more impactful way. This is commendable as it highlights the importance of love in all its forms—romantic, familial, and humanitarian. Everything must be done to ensure that the purity of the society is not abused through Valentine’s Day celebration. We should also not forget that love is not about a single day; it is about a consistent effort and care we show all year round.
Calista Ezeaku
Specialised training or education is the bedrock of the development of the much needed manpower that is elusive in many societies. Most developed economies and societies are human capital driven and not necessarily a function of availability or abounding of natural resources. That explains why Nigeria, with more than 40 mineral resources in over 500 locations, is savagely dwarfed in development. But countries like Cape de Verde, a zero natural resources economy is one of the fastest developing economies in Africa. Cape de Verde economy thrives on tourism. China with over two billion people, the most populous nation in the world, is technology driven. And technology is a function of an efficient and effective manpower development. China, unlike some years back when she was grappling with the attendant vicissitudes of a Third World country, today remains the envy of many nations of the world.
A nation that once depended on international donor agencies for financial assistance and economic development, is an economic force to reckon with, giving grants and loans to developing nations and economies, including Nigeria-the acclaimed giant of Africa. “He who pays the piper” they say, “dictates the tune”, so China playing a leading role in the economic and infrastructural development of many African countries, no doubt, has the capacity to influence the political developments in beneficiary countries.Specialised or skilled manpower is an indispensable tool to midwife development in critical sectors of any society. The Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi endeared himself to several youths in Rivers State through his Greater Horizon and Opportunities Programme (GHOP) and the Overseas Specialised Scholarship Programme which saw over 5,000 indigent Rivers State youths trained abroad to remedy deficient manpower sectors of the State.
Though his successor, Chief Nyesom Wike discontinued with the programmes operated through the Rivers State Sustainable Development Agency (RSSDA) and scrapped the Agency, the Overseas’ Scholarship Programme and the Greater Horizon and Opportunities Programme, have no doubt beefed up the manpower base of the Rivers State. Today, it is not to gainsay the fact that Rivers State is better in terms of manpower development than before the Rt. Hon. Amaechi assumed the saddle of leadership as the Governor of Rivers State. Manpower development through specialised or skills training has both short term and long term development effect on both the primary and secondary consumers of the training or education. That is why the Chairman of Tai Local Government Area, Chief Matthew NenuBari Dike, should be commended for cultivating and implementing the vision of establishing Tai Science Secondary School (TSSS) to address the dearth of manpower in the Medical Sciences, Engineering, Agriculture and other critical areas that are necessary for the development of Tai Local Government Area.
According to Chief Dike, who is highly commended by the people of Tai Local Government for his novel initiative of driving specialised education through the Tai Special Science School, an Education Trust Fund and a legislation to guarantee the sustainability of the Special Science School. One feature common with all successful people the world over, is leveraging. Chief Matthew NenuBari Dike is leveraging, on Sir Siminalayi Fubara and Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi in the areas of human capital development, through the Tai Special Science School. Inducting 104 students who were selected through rigorous screening exercises, for the pilot human capital development scheme, the chairman noted with dismay that in the past several years, no student of Tai Local Government Area had gained admission into university to study medical, health and science, engineering etc, or any of the core science courses.
The consequences of the dearth of manpower in the critical areas in the local government area, are better imagined than experienced. For one thing, it is implication on the Local Government Area is that in the next 10 years, the LGA will inevitably experience a dearth in the human capital, critically necessary for development of the Local Government Area. No doubt, one of the reasons for the teeming unemployed graduates that have saturated the labour market, is the apparent lack of employable skills and academic qualifications. Many graduates of tertiary institutions are unemployable because courses studied have no relevance to the economic and development needs of the society. By establishing the Tai Special Science School, Chief Dike is intentionally addressing the spate of compounded unemployment and miscellany of hydra-headed challenges that have bedevilled youths.
In the next 12 years, graduates of the Tai Special Science School will not only acquire employable skills and knowledge but will be pivotal to the development of the Tai Local Government Area through the acquisition of knowledge and skills in critical fields of study. Since knowledge can be transferred and generated informally, on graduation, the pioneer students will be better placed to affect, influence and mentor other youths. They will also be models for the younger generation.Education remains the bedrock of development and the greatest assets any administration can give to its people, the amount involved notwithstanding. Considering the cost analysis of the programme and projects which involves building of a science based secondary school, with laboratory equipment, provision of science textbooks, funding of the school, overhead cost, and administrative costs, tuition-free and provision of consumables, No doubt the Tai Special Science School is estimated to cost a large chunk of the Local Government’s income.
Chief Dike’s decision to defy the harsh financial implications to drive the human capital development of the Tai Local Government Area through the novel Tai Special Science School , is an eloquent testimony and the testimonial of the care and love he has for the people. Decimus Magnus Ausonius rightly puts it, “the Earth produces nothing worse than an ungrateful man”. I salute Chief Dike for this uncommon capital intensive initiative.
Igbiki Benibo
Minister of Education, Tunji Alausa, Thursday February 6, 2025, triggered curiosity among stakeholders of the Education sector in Nigeria as he announced his proposal to phase out Nigeria’s current 6-3-3-4 education system and introduce a compulsory 12-year uninterrupted basic and 4-year Tertiary education model. Though on Friday February 7, the Federal Government said it was not true that the the 6-3-3-4 system is scrapped, some of the seven-fold “speculated” benefits of the proposed 12-4 system to Nigeria according to Alausa are: Elimination of financial and systemic barriers that often lead to school dropouts; exposing students to vocational and entrepreneurial skills at an earlier stage, equipping them with practical knowledge and preparing them for both higher education and the workforce; implementing a uniform curriculum nationwide, ensuring consistent educational standards across States; Enhancing Economic Development by equipping young people with relevant skills, the reform is expected to reduce child labour and increase employability, contributing to Nigeria’s economic and social development; setting 16 years as the minimum entry age for tertiary education, ensuring students are mentally and emotionally prepared for higher learning.
Considering the benefits the system seems to offer, as outlined by the Minister of Education, one is tempted to pat the back, of the National Council of Education, the highest policy making body on Education. While the introduction of the new system seems good, if the explanation of the Minister of Education is anything to go by, one would ask what was wrong with the 6-3-3-4 system that evident deficiencies could not be remedied? Policy instability and implementation remain the bane of Nigeria’s educational system. When the Universal Basic Education was introduced to replace the Universal Primary Education, stakeholders in the education sector thought that policy would remedy the clogs and deficiencies associated with the Universal Primary Education. But years after the introduction of the policy, there is no significant improvement in the education sector. Rather, the sector is bedevilled by a miscellany of hydra-headed problems. For instance, the Universal Basic Education midwifed the abolition of First School Leaving Certificate Examination and its certification in most states of Nigeria, even though First School Leaving Certificate is being required by some employers of labour to determine the age of applicants and not as a parameter for job placement and promotion.
The Universal Basic Education system which was a nine-year unbroken academic process lacked the manpower, equipment and facilities to drive implementation of the system. The absence of the necessary requirements for smooth take-off and consequent holistic achievement of the policy thrust of the Universal Basic Education made the essence of the policy dead on arrival. Another loop in the system was the seeming complexities in the transition to the Senior Secondary School level. The system makes it mandatory for a student who has undergone nine years of basic education to sit for a qualifying examination to the Senior Secondary level into that same School. If the applicant passed the Junior Secondary Schools Examination, their parents were forced to pay admission fees and meet other requirements before they are enrolled. The Universal Basic Education encumbered unnecessarily on parents’ scarce finances while Principals and teachers leverage on the systemic defects to rip off parents or amass so much money for themselves with impunity.
While Nigeria’s Universal Basic Education policy was patterned after developed nations of the world, and said to be “a best practice in the world”, it never worked after all in Nigeria. If it had worked as the then Minister of Education lulled consumers of education to believe, there would not have been need for the proposed new policy christened: 12-4. What works in other nations of the world does not seem to work in Nigeria, why? The reason is not far-fetched: the will to make it work is elusive. The Federal Government does not work the policy through deliberate and intentional gross under funding of the Education sector against the United Nations’ prescription on the percentage of annual budget nation should allocate to the Education sector. Though the current Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa has painstakingly given reasons why the National Council of Education considered the 12-4 system a comparatively preferable policy to the 6-3-3-4 system, it may still not attain its envisioned peak in operations because of the twin systemic problem of bare-faced corruption and underfunding of the Education sector.
Alausa also advanced Global competitiveness as an advantage of the 12-4 policy. According to him, “many developed nations already operate a 12-year basic education system. Aligning Nigeria’s education system with international standards which will enhance the global competitiveness of Nigerian students and improve educational outcomes”. But without being pessimistic, that the 12-4 system is a working model in developed climes is not a guarantee that it will work in Nigeria. Nigeria is a Third World country, struggling with development, suffocating under the unpleasant euphoria of corruption. The corruption-infested system which seems to allow public funds to be misappropriated, siphoned, outrightly embezzled, by some public servants, sorting, certificate purchase in some tertiary institutions, cannot produce and actualise the quality and best practices of the policy as envisioned by Dr. Alausa.
Nigeria is a rich nation no doubt, with more than 44 mineral resources and abundant human resources, yet her people live in abject poverty. Like the Bible’s Jericho, the “land is pleasant but the water is bitter,” is the experience of Nigeria and Nigeria’s teeming poor. Someone has said, if you bring any of the nations Nigerian politicians travel to on medical or relaxation tourism to run Nigeria, the taps that are dry will flow, the comatose economy will revive, the darkness-ridden homes will be illuminated. Are the benefits of the proposed 12-4 System as outlined mere hype or window dressing? Would the 12-4 Policy be better than the 6-3-3-4 System? Only time will reveal.
Igbiki Benibo