Connect with us

Business

Free Meal Policy: What Impact, How Sustainable?

Published

on

The President Muhammadu Buhari led Federal Government appears ready to implement one of its campaign promises – the provision of free meals for primary school pupils in the country.
What impact will the project have on the education sector? How sustainable  is  it? These were some of the questions our Deputy Editor (Features), Calista Ezeaku put to some members of the public. Our photographer, Ken Nwuieh captured their images.
Lady Onyinye Mgbemena – Lecturer:
Since independence, governments have always formulated sound policies which to all intents and purposes are meant to advance the nation development wise, but midway through implementation, the policies are left to go moribund or entirely jettisoned. Sometimes after serving a pre-determined purpose as a result of several factors traceable most often than not to lack of continuity, being that many of our leaders consciously have not come to realize that government indeed is a continuum.
This brings to mind another set drawback which is lack of political will to faithfully implement policies as well as paucity of funds. Of course, there is the almighty corruption which has sucked in a good number of policies. Shedding more light  on corruption, policies selfishly conceived on the face value may seem good, but upon a little scratch, the real intention of the formulation which is to feather personal and financial interest is revealed. It is against the backdrop of this that I am persuaded to enthuse that the free meal policy, much as it is good, I view with great cynicism over doubt of its sustainability, I want to be proven wrong.
The beauty of this policy cannot be over emphasised. The overwhelming poverty in the land is taking a heavy toll on over 70% of the country’s population, most of which live below the poverty line and therefore can hardly afford a decent meal a day makes the feeding policy very compelling and quite apt at this stage of our nation’s development. It will no doubt afford a child better frame of mind to study without much distraction, with a concomitant boost in education.
Thus, all hands must be on deck to ensure the sustainability of this project and this will be achieved when it is prioritized. On this nexus, I urge government to ensure product management of resources allocated to the project. The inclement economic climate which has seen the price of plummet abysmally in the international market, rendering our economy comatose, makes the prioritisation necessary. Be that as it may. There is the need to create more awareness on the part of parent to send their children and wards to school without necessarily luring them to school using meal as a bait.
In the final analysis government should show more than a passing interest to ensure that the project which has begun in earnest in some pilot states does not become a flash in the pan.
Mrs Osaghae – Teacher: It is a welcome development in the sense that we are presently going through a period of very high cost of foodstuff and other items alongside retrenchment/downsizing of the workforce in many organizations. The effect of this is that several average homes will have to cut down on the number of meals they can offer. This will in turn imply that a good number of children would likely  be sent off to school without breakfast nor a lunch pack; maybe only with a few biscuits to sustain them through the school day. The rigours of academic work which often involves a lot of physical activity as well as mental energy puts a heavy demand on a child’s total energy, which is an end product of proper nutrition. Children and even a good number of adults cannot function optimally when hungry. Serving a meal to school children would therefore ensure that they would be able to concentrate properly and learning would continue to take place irrespective of the prevailing economic circumstance in our nation.
However, the sustainability of this scheme is not certain since it is not addressing the key issue s of unemployment and poverty. Sustainability would therefore be determined by the government of the day. When another regime is in office, they could think and act otherwise.

Alhaji Usman Ibrahim, – Chairman, Arewa Counsultative Forum, Rivers State:
It is a very good policy but I think there are other more important issues in the country that should have been tackled before we start talking of feeding of the pupils. First of all, the primary schools are supposed to be equipped with modern infrastructure and teaching materials. This will boost the primary school education in Nigeria. We are  also faced with the issue of insecurity especially here in Rivers State and we expect the Federal Government to intervene in solving the problem.
However, I still believe the free meal a day to pupils is a good development as it will help the children to be more focused in school. It will encourage them to go to school. It will also make the children to stay in school till the school dismisses. There are instances where pupils go on break and do not return to school. This will be minimized. The free meal policy will also encourage parents to send their children to school. With the current economic situation of the country, many parents can hardly afford one meal a day. So if they are sure that their children will be given one meal a day in school, they will be eager to send them to school.
I pray the programme will be sustained beyond Buhari’s government because in Nigeria we have the problem of continuity of government projects and programmes in Nigeria. And for the free meal a day to pupils programme to be sustained, there must be a proper funding of it. At the same time, the state Universal Basic Education should be involved in the programme. They should be involved in supervising the feeding to ensure that the right things are done. I will also suggest that the national assembly should make a law, compelling all further administration, to implement the policy. I will also advice that effort should be made to empower the parents financially, so that they will leave up to their responsibilities of feeding and catering for the children adequately.

Mrs Pat Opuebi – Civil Servant:-
With the way things are going now, I don’t think the project is sustainable. You see all promises they’ve been making to us, we are not seeing their fulfillment. So the possibility of the realisation of the free meal a day to pupils is very slim. I also feel they are going to politicize the project. So it might not go according to how it was planned. The project is a good one but my fear is that it will not be sustained. It will help the children educationally because sometimes the children leave the house on an empty stomach. Sometimes some of them steal their parents’ money to buy something and eat in school. But having that assurance that they will be fed in school, it will go a long way to help them.
So, I will advise the federal government to put measures in place to ensure that the project is sustained even beyond Buhari’s government.

Mr Kingsley Nnebara – Civil Servant :-
It is a good development if government can abide by the rules of that policy, not tomorrow they cannot continue with it. If they can sustain it, it is good. It will help the children. It will make them to be strong. If they did not eat at home and in school you give them one meal, it is good for them.

Chief Achor Owhonda – Businessman:-
The policy is a good one but I don’t see the feasibility considering the current economic situation of the country. Everything is going down. So I don’t see the Federal government being able to bear such burden in all the public schools in the country. The Federal government has been crying that there is no money and every sector is down sizing. So for the Federal government to say billions of naira has been set aside for this project, it means they have been lying to us. It means there is money. But if there is money, we should even invest it in some other sectors that will yield income, not to feed school children. Feeding of school children shouldn’t be our priority. It should be the responsibility of parents to feed their children. There are some specific food children eat at home and the free meal provided in school might not cater for that. So it will be a waste for Federal government to fund such project.
To me, I will say that rather than helping the children to learn, it will even cause distraction   because there is time for the  food to be served and time for the children to eat the food. So these periods are shorting the time they will use to learn. So it will distract children from learning. Considering  the number of children we have in public schools, it is not possible that the whole children will be fed during break. I’m also certain that the Federal government cannot sustain it. They might be able to manage it for moment but after sometimes it will collapse. Another point is that some people will milk from it. Some people will use it as a means of making money. So I am discouraging it. They should look for other areas to invest our money, not in feeding school children.
As a parent I will not be comfortable for my child to eat the free meal. I was listening to radio sometime ago and a story was told of how a cook in a secondary school in Lagos would blow her nose  inside the food she was cooking for the students. The students saw it and protested. That made some of the students to jettison boarding. That discouraged some of us. For instance, I boarded when I was a student but my children will never board because of such attitude.
You don’t know how the food they give them in school was prepared. They are not prepared in very hygienic environment, sometimes.  So if care is not taken, the free meal a day project might lead to food poisoning because of how and where they are prepared.
So, since the federal government  has already budgeted for the project, they should go ahead and try it. If not I would have advised that they should drop the idea.

Continue Reading

Business

USTR Criticises Nigeria’s Import Ban On Agriculture, Others

Published

on

The United States Trade Representative (USTR) has criticised Nigeria’s import ban on 25 categories of goods, claiming that the restrictions limit market access for American exporters.
This is the effect of President Donald Trump’s tariffs introduction on goods entering the United States, with Nigeria facing a 14 per cent duty.
The USTR highlighted the impact of Nigeria’s import ban on various sectors, particularly agriculture, pharmaceuticals, beverages, and consumer goods.
The restrictions affect items such as beef, pork, poultry, fruit juices, medicaments, and alcoholic beverages, which the United States sees as significant barriers to trade.
The agency argues that these limitations reduce export opportunities for United States businesses and lead to lost revenue.
“Nigeria’s import ban on 25 different product categories impacts United States exporters, particularly in agriculture, pharmaceuticals, beverages, and consumer goods.
“Restrictions on items like beef, pork, poultry, fruit juices, medicaments, and spirits limit United States market access and reduce export opportunities.
“These policies create significant trade barriers that lead to lost revenue for United States businesses looking to expand in the Nigerian market”, the agency said .
In 2016, Nigeria implemented the ban on these 25 items as part of efforts to control imports and stimulate local production.
Some of the banned items include poultry, pork, refined vegetable oil, sugar, cocoa products, spaghetti, beer, and certain medicines.
On March 26, 2025, the  Federal Government also announced plans to halt solar panel imports to encourage local manufacturing as part of its push for clean energy.

Continue Reading

Business

Expert Seeks Cooperative-Driven Investments In Agriculture 

Published

on

A leading agribusiness strategist and digital agriculture expert, Ayo Oluwa Okediji, has sought cooperative-driven investments in sustaining growth of poultry industry in Nigeria.
He said the poultry industry was at a defining moment and requires urgent structural reforms to secure its future and ensure long-term sustainability.
Speaking on the theme, “Strengthening Poultry Farming Through Cooperative Synergy and Strategic Investments”, at the recently concluded Oyo Mega Poultry Workshop 2025 in Ibadan, Okediji called on poultry farmers, cooperative leaders, financial institutions and policy makers to rethink the existing structure of the poultry sector.
He stressed the need to transition from fragmented, individually-driven operations to well-structured, cooperative-led enterprises capable of attracting sustainable financing and securing long-term viability.
He said, “Our poultry sector cannot thrive on individual effort alone. We need to organise ourselves into cooperative clusters, build strong governance systems and position ourselves to attract the level of investment needed to sustain this industry beyond this generation.”
Drawing on lessons from successful global cooperative models such as Rabobank in the Netherlands and Landus Cooperative in the United States, Okediji introduced the FarmClusters Poultry Model, a locally adapted solution developed by Agribusiness Dynamics Technology Limited (AgDyna), a subsidiary of AgroInfoTech Africa.
According to him, the model is currently being piloted in Oyo State in partnership with PANOY Agribusiness Limited and local poultry cooperatives.

Continue Reading

Business

NACCIMA Proposes Hybrid Oil Palm Seedlings For Farmers

Published

on

The Rivers State Representative of the Nigeria Chambers of Commerce, Mines, Industries and Agriculture (NACCIMA), Mr. Erasmus Chukwundah, has urged palm oil farmers to consider hybrid seedlings for planting, if they must break even in palm oil business.
Chukwundah said this recently at the Free Oil Palm Business Climate Smart Best Management Practice/Assistance Training organized by Partnership Initiative In Niger Delta (PIND) for Palm Oil Farmers in Elele, Ikwerre Local Government Area.
The Rivers representative said until palm oil farmers begin to consider such hybrid oil palm seedlings, they may not meet up with the daily increasing demand of palm oil in the market.
According to him, the seedlings produce up to 30 bunches at once that ripen same time.
He said PIND decided to partner with Oil Palm Growers Association of Nigeria (OPGAN) to ensure that the message was received by the targeted audience.
According to him, palm oil remained a popular choice of industry operators as it could be converted to many other products such as vegetable cooking oil.
He also noted that products such as motor tyers, marine ropes and others are now gotten from the palm tree.
Chukwundah, who is the immediate past Director-General of Port Harcourt Chamber of Commerce, Mines, Industries, and Agriculture (PHCCIMA), further warned against use of unrecommended fertilisers in growing oil palms.
He noted that such practices could limit its export value or chances as the foreign marketers have a way of detecting such .
He reiterated the need for organic fertilizers, including poultry droppings, to enable them have a natural palm oil.
“People must reduce physical contact with palm oil production. That is why we are campaigning for hydrolic oil mills. The foreign markets are no longer interested in crude method of palm oil production”, he said.
Meanwhile, one of the farmers, Sonny Didia, who appreciated Chukwundah’s commitment towards the concern of farmers, appealed for an urgent need for loan opportunity with low interest rate in order to enable them beat the target.

King Onunwor

Continue Reading

Trending