Opinion
CAF And The New Dawn
The Confederation of African Football (CAF) witnessed a new dawn with the emergence of Madagascar Football Association boss, Ahmad Ahmad, as president of the soccer body. The election exited Issa Hayatou, a Camerounian, who had been in the saddle for about 29 years.
Like the desire for political change, Ahmad’s election indicates the deep yearning for change from Hayatou’s near uneventful 29 years rule. Some of those who wanted this change predicated it on the need for fresh ideas in the continent’s football governing body.
Ahmad’s victory has therefore heightened expectations and hope that henceforth things would be done differently in line with his campaign promises. Consequently, prospects are high for a brand new CAF.
He has promised sweeping reforms in the affairs of CAF. Of course, no less is expected of him. To prove his seriousness, he indicated moves to call a CAF executive committee meeting, the highest decision-making organ of the body, to deliberate and adopt his reform agenda.
This is a laudable move which deserves commendation because it will democratise the apex soccer body in the continent. In fact, it is one of the things CAF needs in order to be reckoned with globally.
Also, his promise to return football to stakeholders and owners will give unfettered access to football administration in the continent. This will end the situation where the running of football in Africa involves only a limited number of ex-players who attained the zenith of their career.
The practice, however, is different elsewhere, especially in Europe, where former players are really involved in the running or administration of the round leather game to attain remarkable successes.
It was crystal clear that Hayatou’s ouster from his exalted position was already anticipated long before the election took place. Accordingly, some theories have been adduced as explanations for his lose.
There are football analysts who think strongly that the Camerounian lost because he worked against the emergence of the new FIFA President, Giovanni Infantino. I agree with this claim. It isn’t a secret that the FIFA boss was very active in the behind-the-scene activities that extruded Hayatou from his position.
But I also agree with others who think that Hayatou lost following his long stay in office which led to a declining performance. The truth is that his exit emanates from a combination of both factors. However, the reason for his catastrophic failure at the polls is not as important as the obvious truth that he is no more. I am elated.
But I am more elated at the role Amaju Pinnick played in delivering Hayatou’s coup de grace against a federal government directive to act otherwise. He did it wisely and in a classical manner. As President of Nigeria Football Federation, NFF, he correctly read the handwriting on the wall and quickly aligned himself and the nation with the change mantra.
For this reason, the foresighted and smart Pinnick was rewarded with his election into the CAF executive committee, a position which only late Orok Oyo and embatled Amos Adamu have occupied. Neverheless, the NFF president has no option but to be a worthy and good representative of the country.
Hayatou wasn’t a total failure, after all. Despite his unexpected ouster and long stay in office, he attained moderate achievements. He gradually improved Africa’s slot in the World Cup from one to five. Then he aligned the Africa Nations Cup calendar with FIFA’s odd year demand to avert the clash with the World Cup, the highest global football tournament.
Not done, he introduced the CHAN Nations Cup for home-based players and the Women’s Nations Cup as well. Those were indeed worthy achievements, but I believe a lot more has to be done to move Africa’s football forward.
Ahmad needs to bring this change and transparency badly needed to enhance the face of football in Africa. He has to be creative and shore up our football in all ramifications. Though coming from a country relatively known for strong footballing tradition, his ability to deliver is never in doubt.
His election, happening before Russia 2018 World Cup and its planned expansion of participation from 32 to 46, should count for much. The CAF president has to work with his CAF executive committee members to get the most number of additional slots possible for Africa.
Finally, Ahmad must watch against undue tenure elongation which has become an albatross around the neck of those who occupy the position. But quite amazingly, he seemed to understand this danger even before he was elected. Hear him:
“I don’t even know if I will do a second mandate, but three mandates, it is impossible. I will not. I love my life and I will focus on the current term. I will respectfully try to keep my promise of changing things in the management of African football.”
Great! But quite unAfrican. Sadly, Hayatou fell on this slippery ground.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Rivers1 day ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News5 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
