Opinion
Nuisance Of Plastics Disposal
During each monthly environmental sanitation exercise in Port Harcourt, I am amazed at the quantity of ‘pure water’ sachets and plastic bags that are raked out from various drainages in the city. I immediately conducted a quick investigation into this menace. I was shocked to discover the enormity and pervasiveness of the problem.
From east to west, and from north to south, the evidence of this nuisance is seen in the amount of disposed sachets littering the streets of the various state capitals of Nigeria. What, however, Nigerians and our government have failed to realize is the environmental burden the substance places on us.
Environmentalists or experts on the environment refer to plastic bags which include ‘pure water’ sachets as non-biodegradable materials. What this means in very simple term is that they cannot decompose like other organic waste. It is, therefore, not advisable that they be buried as they can affect the soil structure. They cannot be burned because that may affect the ozone layer. How then can they be disposed off?
It is more alarming when I consider the many shopping items that depend on plastic bags for packaging. Where are all these bags kept and where do they end up at last? These are some of the rhetoric questions that bother my mind each time I reflect on this subject.
Plastic bags and ‘pure water’ sachets are common sight in our streets and major roads. They are either littered by human agents or by rain which, when it results in flooding, moves the substances from one location to another.
What has always been a great source of concern to me and perhaps to many Nigerians is the failure of our government at all tiers to address the dilemma. Although it may not make good sense to close down all the factories that produce plastic bags in the country in order to solve the problem, something can be done to either regulate its production or use. On the other hand, an alternative product could be a viable option.
I must commend whoever introduced sachet water into the market. Such a one demonstrated real dexterity in business. This is because the product is convenient for use, affordable and makes good economic sense. It has brought ‘potable’ water to the doorsteps of many Nigerians. Also, the venture has given employment to Nigerians which enables them to put food on their table and finance the education of their children. That is why I will not support any move to stop its production entirely.
But if the truth be told, the fact we all may admit is the high vulnerability of sachet water consumers to water borne diseases. This fact has been proved and evidence abound that many untimely deaths were caused by the consumption of sachet water. This is besides the environmental problems it poses. Therefore, the question we all need to ask is, how can we contain this problem without endangering the production of the water as well as the soul of the environment?
As a nation we cannot compromise the protection of our environment. We need to preserve it for posterity. So, what I think can be done in the circumstances is to commence the immediate production of biodegradable sachets as well as plastic bags which can be used for water packaging and general purposes. This kind of plastics is the type that can decompose. All the government needs to do is to legislate on it and compel producers of the non-biodegradable plastic product to effect a change.
The introduction of biodegradable plastic in the country will not only preserve our environment, it will safeguard our soil and minimize flooding, especially in cities where flooding is caused by blocked drainages. The other step is for the authorities to curb indiscriminate dumping of plastic materials. Already, some states have outlawed this practice and made it a criminal offence. Offenders have to be prosecuted and punished under existing sanitation laws.
Since ‘pure water’ sachets can neither be buried nor incinerated, another means of adequately taking care of several millions of tonnage of sachets being produced and littered is through the recycling process. This will provide a sustainable solution to the incessant blockages of drainages and other water channels with attendant flooding.
It will also lead to the achievement of clean and aesthetic environment through reduced indiscriminate littering/dumping of the sachets, reduction in environmental pollution and degradation.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
