Editorial
JUSUN’s Strike: Matters Arising

Courts and State Houses of Assembly across the country are under lock and key in total compliance with the strike called by the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN) and the Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN) respectively. Both unions have taken industrial action over the non-implementation of financial autonomy for their institutions.
While at the federal category, the judiciary and the National Assembly (NASS) are on the front line charge entitling them to financial autonomy, the same cannot be said of the judiciary and legislature at the state level. Determined to ensure that states give the thumbs up to these constitutional provisions, JUSUN and PASAN consequently instructed their members throughout the country to shut down indefinitely.
Recall that on the 22nd of May, 2020, President Muhammadu Buhari signed Executive Order 10, which seeks to institute the financial sovereignty of the legislature and the judiciary at the state level. Not surprisingly, the President’s action sparked off a heated debate about the constitutionality or otherwise of the Order. This was mainly among state governors.
The objective of the Executive Order 10, also known as the “Implementation of Financial Autonomy of State Legislature and State Judiciary Order, 2020,” is to ensure effective conformity with the 4th Alteration to the Constitution and provide a realistic framework for the legislative and judicial arms of state governments to have financial autonomy.
The 4th Alteration, which amended Section 121(3) of the Constitution, provides that: “Any amount standing credit of the – a) House of Assembly of the state, and b) Judiciary, in the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the state shall be paid directly to the said bodies respectively; in the case of the judiciary, such amount shall be paid directly to the Heads of the Courts concerned.”
Before this modification, Section 121(3) and the related provision contained in Section 81 of the Constitution, which pertains to the Federal Government, provided autonomy for only the judiciary. The President’s Executive Order enjoins the Accountant-General of the Federation to deduct from source the money payable to state legislature and judiciary from the monthly allocations of states whose executive fail to approve of financial autonomy for the other arms of government.
The Order directs state governments to set up a committee comprising the Commissioner of Finance, the Accountant-General of the State, a representative of the state’s Budget Office, the Chief Registrar of the High Court, Sharia Court of Appeal or Customary Court of Appeal as applicable, the Clerk of the House of Assembly and the Secretary of the State Judicial Service Committee or Commission. This committee is to be accorded legal recognition in the appropriation laws of each state. The committee’s main undertaking is to, where appropriate, determine based on the revenue silhouette of the state, a feasible budget for each arm of the state government.
The Executive Order also provides that each state judiciary should set up a judiciary budget committee to be accountable for preparing, administering and enforcing the budget of the judiciary. The committee would incorporate the state’s Chief Judge as Chairman, the Grand Kadi of Sharia Court of Appeal or President of Customary Court of Appeal as applicable, and two members of the Judicial Service Committee or Commission to be appointed by the Chief Judge. The Chief Registrar is to function as Secretary of the committee.
The absence of financial autonomy for both tiers of government has become a protracted issue, specifically with the judiciary, which was granted such autonomy earlier than the 4th Alteration. The desire to implement this autonomy inspired Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) to file a lawsuit against the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), the National Judicial Council (NJC) and the NASS in February 2013. His suit oppugned the extant policies of appropriating the judiciary’s budget in the Appropriation Bills, rather than being a first-line charge paid directly to the judiciary. He insisted that the practice was inconsistent with the constitutional provisions of Section 81(3) of the 1999 Constitution.
Similarly, JUSUN instituted an action against the NJC, AGF and state Attorneys General in the same year, and claimed reliefs for the execution of the monetary autonomy of the judiciary at both the federal and state levels by the provisions of Sections 81(3) and 121(3) of the 1999 Constitution. Both suits were determined in favour of the financial autonomy of the judiciary. However, several years later, essential parts of the judgments are nonetheless being traduced as state governments maintain their breach of the Constitution.
The struggle for real autonomy of state legislature and the judiciary by JUSUN and PASAN deserves support from true lovers of democracy. In any democratic administration, all arms of government bear an equal weight of responsibility. While the legislature makes laws, the judiciary interprets the same and the executive runs the government. To discharge these duties, therefore, the three arms of government must function independently of each other to ensure a balanced society. This is exactly what the principle of separation of powers hypothecates.
Though Nigeria professes to be practising a democratic system of government, her actual applications of democratic principles are far-flung from global standards. Unlike many other nations, the Nigerian judiciary, which ought to be the illuminant of justice and the confidence of the ordinary man, suffers severe inordinate interference from the executive arm of government. For instance, while other arms of government budge their annual budgets to the legislature for approval, the judiciary is constrained from doing the same as their budget estimates are transmitted to the executive instead of the legislature.
Since independence, the judiciary has remained the shellacking organ of the other arms of government, totally famished of funds, influenced at will by the executive and diminished to mere rubber stamp. The legislature undergoes a similar fate. This is the battle Assembly and judiciary workers in the country are currently immersed in and we seriously consider it a just struggle, more so when several courts had ruled on the illegality of the practice.
We endorse any action taken to wean off the judiciary and the legislature from arm-twisting and enslavement, whether by way of a strike, court action or otherwise. Such effort should be sustained by all democrats and indeed all lawyers. We urge Nigerians, including the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to support JUSUN and PASAN as they deserve our collective solidarity, not denunciation. Everyone must patronise this struggle as a truly independent legislature and judiciary is the aspiration of the average Nigerian.
Editorial
Fubara’s Infrastructure Boost For IAUE

Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, has unveiled a bold initiative to upgrade Ignatius Ajuru
University of Education’s (IAUE) infrastructure. This strategic effort is designed to boost the university’s capacity and position it as a leading educational institution in Nigeria. The plan includes a comprehensive redevelopment aimed at improving students’ experience.
This decision came after the university’s Governing Council requested urgent state government intervention to address critical infrastructure needs. Governor Fubara expressed concern over the current state of the institution’s facilities and emphasised his administration’s commitment to enhancing both infrastructure and education quality at IAUE.
The Governor has confirmed plans to construct several key facilities, including a new administrative block, student hostels, a modern health centre, and a sports complex. This extensive move aims to enhance various aspects of university life, improving administrative efficiency, student welfare, and recreational opportunities.
The prospective administrative block will symbolise a dedication to efficiency and seamless operations. Envision a modern, well-organised space where workflows are optimised, enabling university staff to concentrate on their core mission—supporting students and promoting academic excellence. Gone are the days of cramped offices and overflowing paperwork!
Students will also benefit substantially from the construction of new hostels. Many currently struggle with inadequate accommodation which affects both their studies and overall well-being. A comfortable and secure living environment is essential, and these new facilities will provide exactly that. It is like upgrading from a crowded dormitory to a modern apartment—an immense improvement in quality of life.
Access to quality healthcare is necessary for students. The proposed health centre will offer accessible medical services in well-equipped facilities which minimises the hassle of seeking quality care elsewhere. This spunk reflects the university’s commitment to student well-being, recognising that a healthy student is a more productive one.
Similarly, a new sports complex will be a valuable investment in student health, fitness, and social engagement. Beyond promoting physical activity, it contributes to a lively campus environment where students can relax, stay active, and foster friendships. Exercise benefits both the body and the mind, enhancing overall well-being.
Governor Fubara’s recent visit to the institution was more than a mere formality; it was a crucial step in assessing the university’s infrastructure needs. His firsthand examination of the existing facilities allowed him to attain a clear comprehension of the necessary upgrades, ensuring that the planned measures are both specific and influential—much like a medical professional evaluating a patient before suggesting therapy.
These initiatives will elevate IAUE to greater heights, fostering an environment that supports learning, research, and personal development. They will attract top-tier students and faculty to enhance the university’s reputation and academic excellence. Furthermore, the efforts will contribute to a broader vision for the state’s future, as Fubara’s commitment to education represents a strategic investment in human capital.
Ignatius Ajuru University’s infrastructure has faced several challenges, including overcrowded hostels, inadequate healthcare facilities, and a shortage of modern administrative spaces. This situation has hindered both learning and administrative efficiency. The new development aims to address all concerns directly.
We appreciate the Governor’s commitment as the first among past leaders to take concrete steps toward improving IAUE. However, we urge a broader approach that extends similar developments to all higher institutions in the state. For instance, Rivers State University contends with major infrastructural inadequacies, which accentuate the need for broad-based intervention. Ensuring fair distribution of resources across all educational institutions is essential for building a strong and inclusive education system where every student has access to quality facilities.
However, quality education must take priority. While infrastructure plays a role, what truly makes a difference is innovative teaching, a relevant curriculum, well-equipped laboratories, library, skilled lecturers—these elements produce graduates prepared for our interconnected world. IAUE requires additional resources because even the most modern campus with state-of-the-art buildings holds little value if instruction remains outdated or ineffective.
It is essential for both staff and students to show heartfelt appreciation for Fubara, considering that the new facilities will greatly enrich their time spent on campus. However, the responsibility to maintain these amenities falls on the entire university community, which must ensure they use them with circumspection to avoid unnecessary destruction.
To ensure that the ambitious projects achieve their desired success, it is crucial to maintain a high level of transparency and accountability throughout the construction process. Without a doubt, the proposed infrastructure will lay down a solid framework that supports the university’s growth and development in the years to come. This will ultimately encourage continuous progress.
Editorial
UNIZIK’s Expulsion Of Precious Mbakwe

The recent expulsion of Precious Mbakwe, a 300- level female student of History and International Studies of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University (UNIZIK) by the institution’s management for assaulting a lecturer of the school is a commendable sanction. The decision sends a clear message about maintaining discipline and respect within academic institutions.
In a letter signed by the university registrar, Victor Modebelu, and addressed to Mbakwe, the university said the students disciplinary committee found her guilty of assault on a lecturer, Chukwudi Okoye, in the Department of Theatre Arts and Film Studies. The letter further noted that the student violated the Students Disciplinary Regulations particularly Regulation 4 (SDR). This formal documentation shows the university’s commitment to following proper procedures in disciplinary matters.
According to reports, trouble started when Mbakwe pounced on the lecturer, bit him multiple times, and tore his clothes for allegedly interrupting her TikTok video recording along the Faculty of Arts corridor. In response to the uproar, the university management launched a full-scale investigation into the incident. The severity of the assault warranted immediate attention from the institution’s authorities.
We unequivocally condemn the offensive against the lecturer. Acts of violence and misconduct are antithetical to the values of academic inquiry and should have no place within our educational establishments. This physical attack represents a grave breach of trust and conduct, a violation of the very foundation upon which a safe and productive learning surroundings is built.
Such mien cannot be tolerated in any educational setting, as it undermines the principles of respect, intellectual freedom, and the pursuit of knowledge that are essential to our scholarly community. We stand in solidarity with the victim and commit to fostering a campus culture where such occurrences are not only unacceptable but actively prevented.
Mbakwe’s reported action is an embarrassment to the student body and does not represent the values of the Nigerian student locale, which emphasises integrity, respect, and accountability. Such conduct besmirches the reputation of not only the individual but also the broader pedagogical community, which works diligently to uphold high standards of behaviour, professionalism, and academic excellence
We urge the university authorities to take a more decisive action by involving the police in the matter. The serious nature of this episode goes beyond what academic penalties can address. Such action would create a strong precedent, reinforcing the message that violence is intolerable and ensuring that future matters are met with appropriate legal consequences.
The academic milieu must be preserved as a space characterised by respect and learning. It serves as a foundational framework for intellectual growth and the exchange of ideas. Universities, in particular, play a critical and influential role in shaping the future leaders and professionals of society. Given this paramount responsibility, it becomes essential to maintain high standards of action and foster an atmosphere of mutual respect.
Proper channels exist for students to raise concerns and seek resolution of issues they face. Students should utilise these official processes and avoid actions that could harm their educational prospects. The established systems for addressing grievances provide constructive ways to resolve conflicts without resorting to disruptive etiquette.
Respect for lecturers lies at the heart of meaningful learned discourse. When students show genuine regard for their teachers’ expertise and experience, it creates a habitat conducive to erudition and intellectual advancement. This means actively participating in discussions, meeting deadlines, and approaching disagreements with maturity.
University rules serve as the framework that enables thousands of students and staff to coexist and work productively. These regulations, from library policies to examination procedures, are not arbitrary restrictions but carefully considered guidelines that protect erudite integrity and ensure fair treatment for all. Adhering to these guidelines enables students to foster a structured and effective educational environment while enhancing their abilities in complying with institutional regulations.
The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) should issue a formal statement condemning this disruptive comportment and urge all students to maintain decent conduct on campus. The union must emphasise the seriousness of treating lecturers and university administrators with due respect, while fostering an instructional environment that promotes constructive dialogue and mutual understanding between students and the authorities.
This incident should serve as a learning opportunity for all stakeholders in the Nigerian education system about the magnitude of maintaining decorum and following established protocols for conflict resolution. It reinforces the need for continuous dialogue about pertinent demeanour in intellectual settings while adapting to changing social norms.
Editorial
Solid Minerals, Cesspit Of Corruption

The recent revelations by former Labour leader and current Chair of the Senate Committee on Interior, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, have exposed a deeply troubling reality in Nigeria’s solid minerals sector. His disclosure that former military generals and foreign operators have systematically seized control of the country’s mineral deposits illuminates the extent of institutional decay and regulatory capture plaguing this vital economic sector.
Minister of Solid Minerals, Dele Alake’s confirmation of these allegations strengthens Oshiomhole’s claims. The minister’s clear identification of “powerful Nigerians” as the masterminds behind illegal mining operations, along with their alleged ties to terrorist financing networks, paints a troubling picture of the complex web of corruption that is undermining national security.
The audacious manner in which these mining syndicates operate reflects their deeply entrenched position within Nigeria’s power structure. Their apparent immunity from prosecution or oversight demonstrates how thoroughly they have infiltrated key institutions, enabling them to continue their exploitative activities without fear of consequences. This systemic failure has persisted across multiple administrations, highlighting the challenge of confronting these well-connected networks.
Former President Muhammadu Buhari’s tepid response to detailed intelligence briefings about the crisis represented a significant failure of leadership. The current administration under President Bola Tinubu appears to be following a similar pattern of inaction, raising serious questions about the political will to address the endemic corruption. This continued paralysis suggests either inability or unwillingness to challenge powerful vested interests.
The grim contrast between enforcement approaches in different regions of Nigeria reveals troubling inconsistencies in governance. While unauthorised petroleum refineries in the Niger Delta face swift and severe military action, illegal mining operations in the North continue largely unimpeded. This disparity in enforcement not only undermines the rule of law but also fuels regional tensions and perceptions of discriminatory treatment.
Selective enforcement practices by the government have created a dangerous precedent. Small-scale refiners in the South face immediate persecution, while large-scale illegal mining operations in the North proceed with apparent impunity. The uneven application of law enforcement has exacerbated security challenges and deepened existing regional divisions.
Shamefully, the deafening silence from authorities regarding widespread corruption in the mining sector strongly suggests high-level complicity. The “conspiracy of silence” has created an atmosphere of resignation among citizens, who witness the systematic looting of their national resources by a privileged few operating outside the bounds of law and accountability.
Further compounding this crisis is the psychological impact on the Nigerian populace. The visible impunity enjoyed by these mining cartels has fostered a sense of helplessness among ordinary citizens, who increasingly view government institutions as serving the interests of a corrupt elite rather than the general public.
Immediate and decisive actions are required to dismantle these criminal networks and restore integrity to the mining sector. Superficial reforms or symbolic gestures will prove insufficient; what’s required is a comprehensive strategy to investigate, prosecute, and punish all parties involved in illegal mining activities, regardless of their status or connections.
No one can imagine the security implications of allowing illegal mining to continue unchecked. The illicit funds generated from these operations provide essential financing for criminal organisations and extremist groups, creating a direct link between mineral theft and national security challenges. Addressing illegal mining therefore becomes critical for both economic and security reasons.
Reform of the extractive sector must extend beyond enforcement to include comprehensive regulatory overhaul. New frameworks must be established to ensure all mining operations adhere to strict environmental standards and contribute appropriately to national development. This includes implementing transparent permitting processes and ensuring proper revenue collection and distribution.
Transforming Nigeria’s mining sector represents a vital test of governance and national resolve. Success requires not only technical solutions but also the political courage to confront entrenched interests and implement lasting reforms. The future prosperity of Nigeria depends remarkably on whether its leaders can summon the will to protect and properly manage its vast mineral resources for the benefit of all citizens.
-
Business2 days ago
Safety Engineers Honour NCAA Boss
-
Opinion2 days ago
NDDC, A Regional Commission?
-
News2 days ago
Fubara Orders Outgoing LG Chairmen To Hand Over To HLGAS
-
Sports2 days ago
NDSS vows commitment To Sports Competition
-
Featured2 days ago
IYC Expresses Concerns Over Political Tension In Rivers
-
Nation2 days ago
Cultist Escapes Mob Action In Benin City
-
Business2 days ago
Operator Hopes For Improved Airline Operations Through Afrexim Bank
-
Featured2 days ago
We’ve Strengthened Rivers Fire Fighting Capability – Fubara