News
…Senators Move To Override Buhari …Lawan, Gbajabiamila Read Withdrawal Of Assent Letters …CISLAC, TI Task NASS To Veto President
Strong indications emerged, yesterday, that senators may override President Muhammadu Buhari’s veto on the Electoral Amendment Bill, 2021, today.
The development followed the rejection of President Muhammadu Buhari to assent to the Electoral Amendment Bill, 2021, which a letter was acknowledged and read in the Upper Chamber by the Senate President, Dr Ahmad Lawan, at yesterday’s plenary.
This is as the President of the Senate, Dr Ahmad Lawan, yesterday, read the letter of President Muhammadu Buhari withholding of assent to the 2021 Electoral Act Amendment Bill, just as the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) and Transparency International (TI) Nigeria expressed disappointment over the failure of Buhari to sign the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, 2021, and challenged the National Assembly to override the president in the interest of Nigerians.
Senator Thompson Sekibo, representing Rivers East Senatorial District and Chairman, Senate Committee Chairman on Nigeria Navy, in an interview, confirmed, yesterday, that signatures of lawmakers were being collated in earnest to override President Muhammadu Buhari.
The lawmaker described as a huge disappointment, Buhari’s failure to assent to the amendment bill, saying that senators would rise to the occasion irrespective of political differences.
Sekibo believed that majority of senators were not happy, disclosing that about 73 signatures have so far been collated preparatory for today’s override of Buhari’s veto.
Though, efforts to access list of senators who have already indicated readiness to override Buhari through signatures proved abortive, a senator from a North-West state who is a member of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) said, he and “many more others”, are committed to overriding Buhari’s veto today.
“We are 109 in number, and I can vouch for myself and many others that we form the required number in tomorrow’s plenary to override President Buhari.
“Remember that it’s not only direct or indirect primary election that was amended. There are several other items that are of immense benefit to the political development of the nation.”
The lawmaker, who insisted that he should not be quoted further, hinted that they may convene an emergency meeting of northern senators before tomorrow to convince others to see reasons.
President Muhammadu Buhari had, last Monday, written to the upper and lower legislative chambers, saying he declined his assent to the Electoral Act Amendment Bill.
The letter was read by the President of the Senate, Dr. Ibrahim Lawan at yesterday’s plenary.
Buhari’s letter to lawmakers cited several reasons he declined assent, among which he cited security concerns, lack of capacity of smaller political parties and the cost inherent in the conduct of direct primary elections.
Other lawmakers who spoke in similar vein, hinted that overriding Buhari’s veto would precede passage of the 2022 budget.
However, the President of the Senate, Dr Ahmad Lawan, yesterday, read the letter of President Muhammadu Buhari withholding of assent to the 2021 Electoral Act Amendment Bill.
This is as the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) and Transparency International (TI) Nigeria have expressed disappointment over the failure of Buhari to sign the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, 2021, and challenged the National Assembly to override the president in the interest of Nigerians.
Buhari, in the letter is withholding assent to the bill, had cited the imposition of direct primaries approved by the National Assembly, as a means of picking candidates by political parties in the amended Electoral Act as a violation of the spirit of democracy.
According to Buhari, with direct primaries, there will be plethora of litigation from party members and stakeholders, just as he said that allowing the process would fuel corruption as well as encourage over monitisation of the process.
In the letter read during plenary after the senators came out from a closed-door session that was held from 10.42am to 11.42am, Buhari said that direct primaries would raise credibility issues as well as lead to undue interference, even as Buhari asked the Senate to quickly consider 2021 Appropriation Virement of N13.588trillion to fund infrastructure.
Buhari also said that he was withholding assent to the bill based on direct primaries because it would cause a huge financial burden on political parties, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the economy and security agencies, adding that the process was undemocratic.
The National Assembly had on Tuesday, November 9, 2021, passed the much anticipated Electoral Act Amendment Bill 2021 after both the Senate and House of Representatives deliberated extensively on the report of the Conference Committee on the bill.
The Senate had on that day, passed the harmonised version of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, 2021.
The passage followed the consideration of the report of the Conference Committee of the Senate and House of Representatives on the bill.
In line with customary legislative procedures, the two chambers had in September set up Conference Committees to reconcile disparity in the versions of the bill as passed by the Senate and House of Representatives.
Consequently, the National Assembly had on November 19, 2021, transmitted the bill to Buhari for assent in line with Section 58(4) of the 1999 Constitution that “Where a bill is presented to the President for assent, he shall within 30 days thereof, signify that he assents or that he withholds assent.”
Similarly, Speaker, House of Representatives, Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila, has formerly received and read the letter conveying President Muhammadu Buhari’s reasons for withholding assent to the Electoral Act Amendment Bill.
In the letter, the president advanced a couple of reasons for withholding the signature.
The mood of the House can be described as sombre as Gbajabiamila read the letter.
“The conduct of direct primaries across the 8,809 wards across the length and breadth of the country will lead to a significant spike in the cost of conducting primary elections by parties as well as increase in the cost of monitoring such elections by INEC who has to deploy monitors across these wards each time a party is to conduct direct primaries for the presidential, gubernatorial and legislative posts”, the president said amid other reasons.
Reacting, the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) and Transparency International (TI) Nigeria expressed disappointment over the failure of President Muhammadu Buhari to sign the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, 2021.
Consequently, CISLAC and TI have urged the National Assembly to override the president on the Electoral Bill.
The Executive Director of CISLAC and Head, TI Nigeria, Auwal Ibrahim Musa, called on the National Assembly not to disappoint Nigerians but do the needful.
“Elections remain a critical aspect of democracy as it is the gateway for all citizens to achieve their aspirations for democracy, and a transparent election can only be achieved by creating a legal framework, a robust legal framework that can respond to the current challenges we face.
“The bill seeks to improve the electoral system by providing the legal backing for the use of technology in the accreditation of voters and transmission of election results. It seeks to enhance timelines for electoral activities, including voting, collation, and announcement of results, and adequately defines over-voting, confers authority on INEC to review questionable election results and monitor direct primaries for all political parties.
“We believe that this bill will increase transparency in our electoral process, encourage citizens to participate in the process as aspirants and voters as well as help improve the ideology of our elections by reducing the reliance on dirty money.”
Auwal, who is the chairman, Transition Monitoring Group (TMG), urged the lawmakers to exercise their powers to override the president.
“We, therefore, call on the 9th Assembly to etch its name in gold in the right pages of our history by exercising its powers under Section 58 (5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as Amended) which states that, ‘Where the President withholds his assent and the bill is again passed by each House by two-thirds majority, the bill shall become law and the assent of the President shall not be required’.
“If the National Assembly vetoes the president, it will show their independence and above all, respect the view of the constituents who gave them the mandate to legislate on their behalf.
“NASS can simply not afford to disappoint Nigerians!” he said.
Earlier, President Muhammadu Buhari had explained why he declined assent to the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021.
In a letter to the leadership of the National Assembly, Buhari expressed reservations over the imposition of direct primaries on the parties.
Buhari said the bill has serious adverse legal, financial, economic and security consequences.
He noted that the limitation or restriction of the nomination procedures available to political parties and their members constitutes an affront to the right to freedom of association.
In the letter titled: “Withholding of Assent to Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021,” Buhari said: “Further to the letter dated 18th November, 2021, forwarded for Presidential assent, the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021, as passed by the National Assembly, I have received informed advice from relevant Ministries, Departments and Agencies of the government, and have also carefully reviewed the bill in light of the current realities prevalent in the Federal Republic of Nigeria in the circumstances.”
Buhari stated that based on the review, the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021 “has serious adverse legal, financial, economic and security consequences, which cannot be accommodated at the moment considering our nation’s peculiarities.”
Besides, the president stated that the bill also “has implications on the rights of citizens to participate in the government as constitutionally ensured.”
According to him, “The Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021 seeks to amend certain provisions of the extant Electoral Act 2010. Part of the objective of the bill is the amendment of the present Section 87 of the Electoral Act, 2010 to delete the provision for the conduct of indirect primaries in the nomination of party candidates such that party candidates can henceforth only emerge through direct primaries.
“The conduct of direct primaries across the 8,809 wards across the length and breadth of the country will lead to a significant spike in the cost of conducting primary elections by parties as well as increase in the cost of monitoring such elections by INEC, who has to deploy monitors across these wards each time a party is to conduct direct primaries for the presidential, gubernatorial and legislative posts.
“The addition of these costs with the already huge cost of conducting general election will inevitably lead to huge financial burden on the political parties, INEC and the economy in general at a time of dwindling revenues.”
The president also hinged his rejection of the bill on security implications.
According to him, “In addition to increased costs identified above, conducting and monitoring primary elections across 8,809 wards will pose huge security challenges as the security agencies will also be overstretched, direct primaries will be open to participation from all and sundry and such large turn-out without effective security coordination will also engender intimidation and disruptions, thereby raising credibility issues for the outcomes of such elections.”
Buhari also said the bill is a violation of the spirit of democracy.
He said: “The amendment as proposed is a violation of the underlying spirit of democracy, which is characterised by freedom of choices. Political party membership is a voluntary exercise of the constitutional right to freedom of association. Several millions of Nigerians are not card-carrying members of any political party.
“Thus, the emphasis should be on enabling qualified Nigerians to vote for the candidate of their choice during general election as a means of participation in governance and furtherance of the concept of universal adult suffrage or universal franchise.”
The president added that the bill as presently captured would give rise to litigations “based on diverse grounds and issues of law including but not limited to the fact that the proposed amendment cannot work in retrospect given that the existing constitution of the parties already registered with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), permits direct, indirect and consensus primaries.
“This real possibility, will, without doubt, truncate the electoral programme of the nation as another electoral exercise is imminent towards a change of government in 2023. Nigeria is at the moment still grappling with the issues of monetisation of the political process and vote buying at both party and general election.
“The direct implication of institutionalising only direct primaries is the aggravation of over monetisation of the process as there will be much more people a contestant needs to reach out to thereby further fuelling corruption and abuse of office by incumbent contestants, who may resort to public resources to satisfy the increased demands and logistics of winning party primaries.”
The president did not rule out manipulation of the process through direct primaries.
He said: “Rival parties can also conspire and mobilise people to vote against a good or popular candidate in a party during its primaries just to pave way for their own candidates. Whereas where voting is done by accredited delegates during indirect primaries, the above irregularities are not possible.
“The major conclusions arrived at upon the review are highlighted hereunder, to wit: Asides its serious adverse legal, financial, economic and security consequences, the limitation or restriction of the nomination procedures available to political parties and their members constitutes an affront to the right to freedom of association.
“It is thus undemocratic to restrict the procedure or means of nomination of candidates by political parties, as it also amounts to undue interference in the affairs of political parties.
“Indirect primaries or collegiate elections are part of internationally accepted electoral practices. More so, direct primaries are not free from manipulations and do not particularly guarantee the emergence of the will of the people especially, in circumstances like ours, where it is near impossible to sustain a workable implementation framework or structure thereof.
“In the premise of the above, I hereby signify to the National Assembly that I am constrained to withhold assent to the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2021 in line with the provisions of Section 58(1) & (4) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
“It is my considered position that the political parties should be allowed to freely exercise right of choice in deciding which of direct or indirect primaries to adopt in the conduct of their primary elections as their respective realities may permit. Please, accept the assurance of my highest consideration and esteem.”
By: Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi, Abuja
A bill to amend the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000 has passed its second reading in the House of Representatives.
The bill, which mandates compulsory counselling and training for individuals convicted of corruption-related offences, was sponsored by Kayode Akiolu (APC-Lagos) during plenary on Wednesday.
Leading the debate, Mr Akiolu explained that the bill sought to amend Section 67 of the principal act, introducing new provisions that were not part of the original section.
“These additional provisions, found in subsections 2, 3, and 4 of the amendment bill, require judges and magistrates to not only impose imprisonment and/or fines on those convicted of corruption but also mandate a minimum four-week anti-corruption counselling and training.
“The counselling and training will be designed and delivered by the Anti-Corruption Academy of Nigeria (ACAN) and aims to address the psychological factors related to corrupt behaviour,” Mr Akiolu said.
Mr Akiolu emphasised that the training would help reform convicts by addressing their corrupt tendencies and could even transform them into advocates for anti-corruption efforts.
He added that this approach aligned with the reformative aspect of the criminal justice system, which focused on punishment and rehabilitation.
“As per subsection 4, the bill allows magistrates and judges to order convicts to cover the cost of their counselling and training, preventing additional financial burdens on the government,” the lawmaker noted.
Mr Akiolu further argued that if the bill is passed into law, it would strengthen the country’s fight against corruption.
Given the widespread negative impact of corruption, he urged the House to support the bill for the country’s benefit.
Following the debate, Speaker Tajudeen Abbas referred the bill to the relevant committee for further legislative consideration.
The Judiciary and the Media are key pillars of democracy, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, has said.
Kekere-Ekun made this statement in her address at the 2024 National Conference of the National Association of Judiciary Correspondents (NAJUC).
The CJN was represented by Mr Abdulaziz Olumo, the Secretary of the National Judicial Institute (NJI).
“ The judiciary and the media occupy unique and complementary roles in any democratic society.
“ The judiciary serves as the guardian of justice, equity, and the rule of law, the media acts as the conscience of society, disseminating information, shaping public opinion, and ensuring accountability.
“ Together, these institutions provide checks and balances that strengthen the fabric of democracy,” she said.
Quoting Felix Frankfurter, a former U.S. Supreme Court Justice, she said: free press is not to be preferred to an independent judiciary, nor an independent judiciary to a free press. Neither has primacy over the other; both are indispensable to a free society.”
The CJN said this dynamic interdependence between the judiciary and the media presents opportunities and challenges alike.
“ The media is entrusted with the responsibility of informing the public about judicial activities, the judiciary relies on accurate and ethical reportage to enhance public confidence in its work.
“ However, the inherent power of the media to influence public opinion requires careful management, especially when its focus turns to judicial proceedings.
“ The question posed by Robert J.Cordy, a former Associate Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, is pertinent here: “What happens when the free press turns its sights on the courts-scrutinizing, sensationalizing, and exposing the frailties of the judiciary while questioning its ethical standards and performance?”
“The media’s capacity to shape narratives and perceptions is undeniable” she said.
Quoting Jim Morrison , she said “Whoever controls the media controls the mind.”
According to her, this underscores the immense responsibility placed on journalists to report truthfully, fairly, and objectively.
“ Unfortunately, the commercialisation of news and external influences have led to the rise of sensationalism-a practice that distorts facts, erodes trust, and undermines the very essence of journalism.
“ Sensationalised headlines, such as the infamous 2016 headline “We raided the houses of ‘corrupt, unholy’ judges, says DSS,” can paint a skewed picture of the judiciary and its officers. Such reporting, often devoid of context, compromises the integrity of the justice system and misleads the public.
“ Closely tied to this is the issue of “trial by media,” where premature and often biased media narratives prejudge cases and infringe on the constitutional rights of individuals” she said.
She added that as Mahatma Gandhi rightly observed, “The sole aim of journalism should be service.” It is imperative for media practitioners to remain steadfast in their commitment to truth and objectivity.
To this end, she advised, the National Association of Judiciary Correspondents to take proactive steps to regulate the activities of its members.
“ This is not merely about enforcing rules but about fostering professionalism and safeguarding the credibility of the media.
“ The judiciary and the media must work as partners in progress.
“ To bridge the gap between these institutions, there is a pressing need for constructive engagement and mutual understanding.
“ Courts can provide the media with guidelines on judicial processes, courtroom decorum, and the nuances of court proceedings.
She noted that globally, courts have adopted initiatives to support the media’s role in reporting judicial matters.
For instance, she said the Supreme Court of Dakota’s media guide outlines protocols for courtroom reporting, while the UK ‘s Media Guidance document provides clarity on access and etiquette for journalists.
“ These examples demonstrate how structured collaboration can enhance the quality of judicial reportage.
“ In Nigeria, we can take a cue from these models by developing a comprehensive media guide tailored to our judicial landscape.
“ This initiative, which would involve inputs from NAJUC and judicial stakeholders, would not only enhance media access to courtrooms but also ensure that judicial activities are accurately and responsibly reported” she said.
She advocated that judiciary correspondents must make deliberate efforts to familiarise themselves with the rules and procedures of the courts.
She added that understanding these frameworks will enable journalists to navigate the complexities of judicial proceedings effectively and responsibly.
“ Training programs such as this conference play a crucial role in equipping judiciary correspondents with the knowledge and skills needed to report judicial matters accurately.
“ The theme of this year’s conference, “The Role of Courts in Enforcement of Judgments,” is both timely and significant, as it addresses an aspect of judicial work that is critical to upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice.
“ I commend NAJUC for its commitment to promoting accountability and transparency through its engagements with the judiciary.
“ As I conclude, I must emphasize the importance of credible journalism in strengthening public trust in the judiciary” she said.
She urged judiciary correspondents to prioritise the pursuit of truth and objectivity, resist undue influences, and remain steadfast in their commitment to ethical standards.
She commended the leadership of NAJUC, under the chairmanship of Mr Kayode Lawal, for its efforts in promoting professionalism among judiciary correspondents.
The Senate has issued an arrest warrant for the Managing Director of Julius Berger Nigeria Plc, Dr Peer Lubasch, to appear before its Committee on Works.
The Tide’s source reports that the warrant was for Lubasch to explain the utilisation of funds appropriated for the reconstruction work on Calabar-Odukpani-Itu highway.
The warrant followed the adoption of a motion sponsored by Sen. Osita Ngwu (PDP- Enugu) and co-sponsored by Sen. Asuquo Ekpenyong (APC-Cross River) and Sen. Mpigi Barinada (PDP- Rivers) at plenary in Abuja, yesterday.
Ngwu, in the motion said, that the senate had mandated the committee on works to conduct investigation into the state of road infrastructure across the country.
He said that in furtherance to the investigative hearings, Julius Berger refused to honour invitations to provide details of its role in the Calabar-Odukpani-Itu highway project, in spite of receiving substantial public funds.
He said that this was worrisome, given the alarming discrepancies in performance among contractors on the project, with specific reference to Julius Berger for failing to meet delivery timelines.
Ngwu said it was the constitutional powers of the National Assembly under Sections 8 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, to conduct investigations on any person or organisation responsible for administering public funds.
He said that the powers set out in section 6 of the legislative powers and privileges act empowered the Senate to issue warrants of arrest on persons in contempt of its proceedings.
The Tide source reports that the senate further ruled that President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, should sign the warrant, mandating the Julius Berger managing director to appear on a date to be communicated.
Akpabio said that the senate’s decision was in line with its constitutional powers under Section 89 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
“This senate will not tolerate the continued disregard of its authority.
“The managing director of Julius Berger must appear before the relevant committee, failing which further actions will be taken as prescribed by the constitution.
“The point of order, which was supported by the majority of the senators, highlighted the importance of upholding the integrity of the legislature.
“The senate committee will submit its findings to the National Assembly after the MD’s appearance.
“If there is any further failure to comply, we shall take the necessary steps to ensure respect for the constitution and the rule of law,” Akpabio said.
