Opinion
Celebrating World Environment Day
It is that time of the year when a special attention is paid to the environment and how to make it healthier. The theme of this year’s World Environment Day commemoration, “Only One Earth”, calls for collective, transformative action to celebrate, protect and restore the planet.
Environment is key to human existence. The quality of human life depends largely on how healthy the environment is. At this juncture, it will not be out of place to look at the meaning of environment by various authorities. The UK Environmental Protection Act of 1990, defines the environment as consisting of the air, water and land. The medium of air according to this authority includes the air within buildings and the air within other natural or manmade structures above and below the ground.
Here in Nigeria, a statutory definition of environment is provided in Section 38 of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency Act (FEPA Act). It states that the environment includes water, air, land and all plants and human beings or animals therein and the inter-relationship which exists among these or any of them.
The importance of the environment to man cannot be over emphasised. Man needs the environment to survive. The environment provides food, shelter, air, water, timber, natural gas and fulfills all the human needs. Moreover, the entire life support of humans depends wholly on the environmental factor. In addition, it helps in maintaining various life cycles on earth.
There is a tendency for us in Nigeria to say that we have bigger problems in the country that need more attention right now more than the environment. But if the environment is not well cared for, how far can we go in solving these problems? How can we be in a good frame of mind to think of solutions to these problems if we are constantly faced with water, land, air, oil, noise, solid waste, visual pollution and other forms of environmental problems that pose threats to our lives?
A clean environment is essential for healthy living. The more we do not care about our environment, the more it will become polluted with contaminants and toxins that have harmful impact on our health. Air pollution like soot that has bedeviled the state for many years can cause respiratory diseases and cancer, among other problems and diseases.
Painfully, waste management is still a big issue in the state just like many other cities and towns in the country. It just seems as if we do not know what to do with the huge waste being generated in our society every day. Some citizens have converted many road sides and median and other unauthorised places to refuse dumps, making it difficult for the little efforts of the government at keeping the environment healthy and clean to yield the desired results.
The Mayor of Port Harcourt, Allwell Ihunda, was in the news two days ago, claiming that the council spends about N800,000 daily on waste disposal and sanitation. As unbelievable as the amount may sound, especially going by the volume of garbage in the city, it goes to show that the council is concerned and taking actions towards the restoration of the Garden City status of the state.
But although more is expected of the authorities concerned both at the state and local government levels towards making our environment clean, it is obvious that they cannot do it alone. The residents have to play their own roles in making this our one earth clean and healthy. The five Rs of waste management quickly comes to mind here. The five Rs – Refuse, Reuse, Reduce, Repurpose and Recycle, a process used by businesses to make the outcome of their recycling programmes better through reducing the amount of waste companies produce can also be deployed by individuals in the management of their own waste.
We have to make deliberate efforts towards keeping our environment clean. Refuse not to litter the streets of the state and our communities aimed at keeping the state beautiful; reduce the harmful, wasteful, and non-recyclable so as to lessen the amount of wastes that will be dumped in the landfill, bearing in mind that the more material that gets dumped in the landfill, the quicker it fills, thus requiring more space for garbage storage which may not be easy to come by. Let us form the habit of using reusable items for our daily use so as to reduce the amount of waste we generate. For instance, we can use napkins in our kitchens instead of disposable papers. We can reuse nylons and plastics.
Also, an item meant for a particular purpose can be kept for another use instead of discarding it after the first use. Last Sunday, some people from the Federal Ministry of Environment who were at my worship center to educate us on the five Rs said we can segregate our waste both at home, offices and business places, using the colour coded bins, reuse the ones we can and take the recyclable ones to recycling factories where they will be recycled and we will still be paid for them. How many of these factories do we have in our state, one would ask.
This is surely the way to go in order to have a healthy environment. There is the need therefore for sensitisation on this. The various organisations advocating for a better environment are not doing badly but they certainly need to do more. They also need the support of the government and the citizens to achieve better results.
It is also important that the government ups its game in dealing with refuse in our society. If you tell people to stop indiscriminate disposal of waste, provide them with an alternative place to dump their garbage. Provide more receptacles close to the people and ensure that those in charge of evacuating them are efficient in their responsibilities. Adequate punishment for defaulters will also help the people to be more committed to making our environment better.
Other forms of pollution, particularly oil pollution, which has been the lot of many communities in the Niger Delta region for decades, must also be looked at. Recently, there was a reported case of crude oil spillage at Touma-Ama Community Manifold in Bille kingdom. An environmental rights group, Youths and Environmental Advocacy Center (YEAC), which brought the incident to the fore, raised the alarm over the far reaching consequences of the spill, including destruction of the marine life and wildlife habitat, contamination of drinkable water, pollution of farm lands and swamps, outbreak of fire, health hazards to man and many more, and called on Eroton Exploration and Production Company Ltd (Eroton E&P Ltd), the state and local governments to ensure expedited measures were taken towards tackling the problem. What has been done about that issue?
Many companies are endangering the environment and by extension, the people, through improperly channeling their waste-water outlet and other environmentally unfriendly activities.
Yes, development and employment opportunities are important as they add to the quality of human life but they should not come at the detriment of the environment. If the people these employment opportunities and developmental activities are meant for are put at risk, the sources of their livelihood destroyed, diseases brought upon the people, then what is the essence of all the development and employment opportunities.
It is therefore, pertinent that in carrying out industrial and development activities, the protection of the environment by engaging in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and other precautionary measures should be a top priority.
World Environment Day is the biggest intentional day for the environment led by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and held on June 5, every year since 1973, it has grown to be the largest global platform for environmental outreach. Along with the theme, let us today begin to do things towards the preservation of the earth. If we cherish it, let us appreciate it and preserve it.
By: Calista Ezeaku
The events that unfolded in Abuja on Tuesday November 11, 2025 between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Chief Nyesom Wike and a detachment of soldiers guarding a disputed property, led by Adams Yerima, a commissioned Naval Officer, may go down as one of the defining images of Nigeria’s democratic contradictions. It was not merely a quarrel over land. It was a confrontation between civil authority and the military legacy that still hovers over our national life.
Nyesom Wike, fiery and fearless as always, was seen on video exchanging words with a uniformed officer who refused to grant him passage to inspect a parcel of land alleged to have been illegally acquired. The minister’s voice rose, his temper flared, and the soldier, too, stood his ground, insisting on his own authority. Around them, aides, security men, and bystanders watched, stunned, as two embodiments of the Nigerian state clashed in the open.
The images spread fast, igniting debates across drawing rooms, beer parlours, and social media platforms. Some hailed Wike for standing up to military arrogance; others scolded him for perceived disrespect to the armed forces. Yet beneath the noise lies a deeper question about what sort of society we are building and whether power in Nigeria truly understands the limits of its own reach.
It is tragic that, more than two decades into civil rule, the relationship between the civilian arm of government and the military remains fragile and poorly understood. The presence of soldiers in a land dispute between private individuals and the city administration is, by all civic standards, an aberration. It recalls a dark era when might was right, and uniforms conferred immunity against accountability.
Wike’s anger, even if fiery, was rooted in a legitimate concern: that no individual, however connected or retired, should deploy the military to protect personal interests. That sentiment echoes the fundamental democratic creed that the law is supreme, not personalities. If his passion overshot decorum, it was perhaps a reflection of a nation weary of impunity.
On the other hand, the soldier in question is a symbol of another truth: that discipline, respect for order, and duty to hierarchy are ingrained in our armed forces. He may have been caught between conflicting instructions one from his superiors, another from a civilian minister exercising his lawful authority. The confusion points not to personal failure but to institutional dysfunction.
It is, therefore, simplistic to turn the incident into a morality play of good versus evil.
*********”**** What happened was an institutional embarrassment. Both men represented facets of the same failing system a polity still learning how to reconcile authority with civility, law with loyalty, and service with restraint.
In fairness, Wike has shown himself as a man of uncommon courage. Whether in Rivers State or at the FCTA, he does not shy away from confrontation. Yet courage without composure often feeds misunderstanding. A public officer must always be the cooler head, even when provoked, because the power of example outweighs the satisfaction of winning an argument.
Conversely, soldiers, too, must be reminded that their uniforms do not place them above civilian oversight. The military exists to defend the nation, not to enforce property claims or intimidate lawful authorities. Their participation in purely civil matters corrodes the image of the institution and erodes public trust.
One cannot overlook the irony: in a country where kidnappers roam highways and bandits sack villages, armed men are posted to guard contested land in the capital. It reflects misplaced priorities and distorted values. The Nigerian soldier, trained to defend sovereignty, should not be drawn into private or bureaucratic tussles.
Sycophancy remains the greatest ailment of our political culture. Many of those who now cheer one side or the other do so not out of conviction but out of convenience. Tomorrow they will switch allegiance. True patriotism lies not in defending personalities but in defending principles. A people enslaved by flattery cannot nurture a culture of justice.
The Nigerian elite must learn to submit to the same laws that govern the poor. When big men fence off public land and use connections to shield their interests, they mock the very constitution they swore to uphold. The FCT, as the mirror of national order, must not become a jungle where only the powerful can build.
The lesson for Wike himself is also clear: power is best exercised with calmness. The weight of his office demands more than bravery; it demands statesmanship. To lead is not merely to command, but to persuade — even those who resist your authority.
Equally, the lesson for the armed forces is that professionalism shines brightest in restraint. Obedience to illegal orders is not loyalty; it is complicity. The soldier who stands on the side of justice protects both his honour and the dignity of his uniform.
The Presidency, too, must see this episode as a wake-up call to clarify institutional boundaries. If soldiers can be drawn into civil enforcement without authorization, then our democracy remains at risk of subtle militarization. The constitution must speak louder than confusion.
The Nigerian public deserves better than spectacles of ego. We crave leaders who rise above emotion and officers who respect civilian supremacy. Our children must not inherit a nation where authority means shouting matches and intimidation in public glare.
Every democracy matures through such tests. What matters is whether we learn the right lessons. The British once had generals who defied parliament; the Americans once fought over states’ rights; Nigeria, too, must pass through her own growing pains but with humility, not hubris.
If the confrontation has stirred discomfort, then perhaps it has done the nation some good. It forces a conversation long overdue: Who truly owns the state — the citizen or the powerful? Can we build a Nigeria where institutions, not individuals, define our destiny?
As the dust settles, both the FCTA and the military hierarchy must conduct impartial investigations. The truth must be established — not to shame anyone, but to restore order. Where laws were broken, consequences must follow. Where misunderstandings occurred, apologies must be offered.
Let the rule of law triumph over the rule of impulse. Let civility triumph over confrontation. Let governance return to the path of dialogue and procedure.
Nigeria cannot continue to oscillate between civilian bravado and military arrogance. Both impulses spring from the same insecurity — the fear of losing control. True leadership lies in the ability to trust institutions to do their work without coercion.
Those who witnessed the clash saw a drama of two gladiators. One in starched khaki, one in well-cut suit. Both proud, both unyielding. But a nation cannot be built on stubbornness; it must be built on understanding. Power, when it meets power, should produce order, not chaos.
We must resist the temptation to glorify temper. Governance is not warfare; it is stewardship. The citizen watches, the world observes, and history records. How we handle moments like this will define our collective maturity.
The confrontation may have ended without violence, but it left deep questions in the national conscience. When men of authority quarrel in the open, institutions tremble. The people, once again, become spectators in a theatre of misplaced pride.
It is time for all who hold office — civilian or military — to remember that they serve under the same flag. That flag is neither khaki nor political colour; it is green-white-green, and it demands humility.
No victor, no vanquish only a lesson for a nation still learning to govern itself with dignity.
By; King Onunwor
