Opinion
What It Means To Be Awake
Decades ago, one Professor Chukwuemeka Ike wrote a book titled Naked Gods. Not many Nigerian readers appreciated the deeper significance of that work. One had the opportunity recently to review the manuscript of a work titled A Harvest From Tragedy, a book that would soon be available to the public. A valid conclusion which anyone can draw is that the mind set and attitude of a large proportion of Nigerians tend towards gross obtuseness. A state of stupor!
An obtuse mindset or attitude is one that is slow to understand the significance and import of events taking place in an individual’s environment. Obtuse mindset produces a predominantly obtuse environment where a larger population of the people can be swindled, bamboozled and set asunder by gangsters and power mongers, without them being awake to what is going on. A predominantly obtuse population hides away its deficiency of mindset through various clever ways that are meant to give some semblance of wit and wisdom. We call it “gra-gra” in Nigeria.
Compensationary behavioural patterns include the indulgence in flamboyant lifestyle, braggadocio and noise-making, to be heard and seen as being relevant, as well as conceit. Having a bloated opinion of oneself and one’s ability, whereby an individual throws his weight about in every issue or meddles in every affair, can be a part of having to hide away personal deficiencies. The ultimate result of hiding personal inadequacies under compensatory behaviours and power blustering, is the installation of a personal defence mechanism which manifests in narrow-mindedness and “gra-gra” attitude.
We can hardly deny the fact that the Nigerian environment has grown darker and denser in the past sixty years, arising from an influx of inferior souls in the society. Decent and noble persons who would not want to be tainted, corrupted and sucked into the vortex of degenerated and depraved environment, seek to withdraw from such environment. The process of corruption, pollution and degeneration of a country is usually accompanied by shameless and flamboyant lifestyles of the political elite, of which reckless spending of public resources and acts of impunity also feature. Borrowing follows!
We can also hardly deny the fact that many years of military rule played some significant role in the current unenviable state of the Nigerian nation. At least, acts of violence, looting and lechery associated with military culture, contributed in no small way in the influx of inferior souls into the environment. It is of particular note that several women, including noble and decent ones, were abused grossly and forced into such lifestyles that they did not choose voluntarily. From sordid deeds of the past, there is now a harvest from tragedy. Neither is there a change for the better yet!
In making an assessment or analysis of current situations in Nigeria, it would be vital and necessary to take into account what had taken place before new, especially in the past sixty years. It would also be needful to consider that life is governed by definite laws which ensure that justice and equity prevail. But unfortunately in an environment populated by obtuse persons and led by an obtuse elite, events around them are rarely evaluated on the basis of the Law of Cause and Effect. We look for scapegoats in most cases.
An individual or a nation is awake where the laws governing life are known and used as basis for addressing issues. To be awake goes beyond intellectual cleverness and smartness, but it involves recognising the truth concerning extra-sensory perception. Those who, in their obtuseness and narrow-mindedness, fail to look at issues beyond immediately visible context, would always make wrong judgements. In the case of current events in Nigeria, the truth is that there is more to what is immediately visible than what we know. Things don’t just happen, but they are caused.
Events are usually symbolic messages, demanding to be properly decoded and then appropriate steps taken to redress them. Means of redressing experiences which are the outcome of previous deeds include penitence, such that the status and quality of the humans involved would change drastically for the better. Where there is no change towards a qualitative lifestyle, no amount of legislations and political shenanigans would bring any difference. A vital question to ask is: Are Nigerians wiser, better and of higher integrity today, than before 1966? We are merely more clever!
The Nigerian Civil War (1967-1970) was definitely a message and an opportunity, but thrown to the wind, rather than turned into an asset. Another question which Nigerians should ask is: Are the factors and lifestyles which led to the civil war no longer with us today? Anyone old enough, awake and involved enough to know what happened in Nigeria, 1963-1967, would know that virus and shenanegans of that period are gathering momentum once again now. Where there is no change in attitude and mindset, lessons of history are lost, resulting in a repeat of past tragedies.
If Nigerian political elite were awake and honest enough, the issue of an unfair but clever war indemnity imposed on the side that lost in the 1967-1970 civil war would have been obvious. Neither is the issue of an unfair power structure seen as a deliberate ploy. We would beat about the bush in telling ourselves the truth that a power block arrogates to itself the posture and status of being born to rule, expecting others to serve and succumb to intimidation.
Why is the issue of an “Igbo Presidency” not seen yet as a part of the war indemnity, as a deliberate ploy and as a message? There was a “top secret” message 55 years ago that “future generations will pay for the audacity of staging a one-sided military coup …” Do we not have the courage and integrity to admit that the Nigerian political economy, with oil and gas resources as the epicenter, is an issue of high-stake? Is there nothing fishing about a supposedly secular nation being dragged into membership of the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) arbitrarily by Military President Ibrahim Babangida?
If nothing else would awaken Nigerians from a state of complacence, let the recent lynching and burning of the corpse of a girl in a tertiary institution in Sokoto, be a trumpet call. A similar lynching for alleged blasphemy took place in another tertiary institution in which one Akaluka was the victim. Religious extremism is usually a ploy, gambit and strategy in power blustering and consolidation. Promoters of such violent extremism and terrorism are usually masters in bamboozlement and dribbling of the unsuspecting masses. To be awake is to become knowing and to be able to read the lips and body language of power merchants. A nation gets the kind of leadership it deserves, especially when the masses are asleep!
By: Bright Amirize
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Sports3 days agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports3 days agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports3 days agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Sports3 days agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Sports3 days agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
-
Sports3 days agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports3 days agoPalmer Stars As Chelsea Compound Wolves Woes
-
Sports3 days agoBarca Pull Out Of Super League Project
