Editorial

ASUU: No To NLC Strike

Published

4 years ago

July 25, 2022

As part of efforts to compel the Federal Government to meet the demands of striking university-based unions, including the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and its affiliate unions, said it would embark on a two-day national solidarity protest tomorrow and Wednesday.
Labour’s threat follows the lack of progress in the negotiations with the leadership of the ASUU, Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities (SSANU), Non-Academic Staff Union of Educational and Associated Institutions (NASU), and the National Association of Academic Technologists (NAAT). The NLC President, Ayuba Wabba, had directed all affiliate unions to comply with the directives on the planned protest at the National Executive Council (NEC) meeting of the Congress.
It is sad that universities in the country have been shut down for five months following strike by the various unions over the alleged failure of the Federal Government to meet their demands. Given the protracted nature of the strike, President Muhammadu Buhari, last week, directed the Ministers of Education, Adamu Adamu; and Labour and Employment, Chris Ngige; to resolve the lingering strike by ASUU and report back to him within two weeks.
ASUU had embarked on a warning strike on February 14, 2022, which clandestinely metamorphosed into an indefinite industrial action, leading to the suspension of all academic activities in federal universities. Some state universities also joined in sympathy. Since then, efforts by the authorities and other stakeholders to resolve the impasse have failed.
At the centre of the strike are the alleged government’s failure to honour the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) it signed with the union, the government’s poor commitment to the payment of Earned Academic Allowance (EAA) and release of revitalisation funds, inadequate funding of the universities, the continued use of the Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System (IPPIS) and refusal to adopt the University Transparency and Accountability Solution (UTAS), and proliferation of public universities in the country.
For its part, the Federal Government stated that it had implemented most of the contents of the agreements with the union. It said that substantial amounts have been released for EAA and revitalisation of the institutions while UTAS, according to the Nigeria Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), has “passed acceptability test but failed integrity test and credibility test, which formed the bulwark against hacking”. The government, therefore, set up a seven-man Prof Nemi Briggs-led committee to renegotiate the 2009 pact. The committee is said to have submitted its report to the government for implementation.
This is not the first time organised labour has intervened in labour disputes in the nation’s Ivory Tower. In 2013, NLC mediated in an ASUU strike by writing to the Presidency to devise modalities to resolve the industrial action. In 2021, it again, played vital role to resolve the standoff between the Federal Government and ASUU for university students. The NLC has been making failed efforts to end the current strike. However, the propriety of this intervention remains questionable, particularly as it affects Rivers State.
We condemn the penchant for strikes, which has done incalculable damage to the educational development of the country. Since the return of democracy in 1999, ASUU has spent, at least, 1,500 days on strike. The quick resort to strikes by ASUU members is irrational since the union can as well adopt other proactive and constructive alternatives. We are worried that for a country with over 40 million out-of-school children, prolonged stay out of tertiary institutions by youths will fill the growing crime pool. ASUU has to realise this fact and quickly suspend the strike.
Labour’s planned solidarity protest must be taken seriously because if carried out, may shut down businesses and stoke anarchy, thereby compounding the nation’s feeble economy. Nothing can justify this! We implore labour to immediately rescind its decision, and allow government implement the committee’s report.
We say so for a number of reasons. First, it is not in all universities that ASUU and other unions are on strike, especially state and private institutions. In these institutions, including those in Rivers State, workers’ entitlements are paid as at when due and enabling environment created for seamless teaching and learning. Therefore, it is wrong to direct workers in those states, including Rivers State, to embark on any solidarity strike.
Besides, the NLC in some states, particularly Rivers State, has become political partisans, and their officials constituting themselves as opposition elements to destabilise the government. Allowing NLC in Rivers State to call out workers on strike obviously amounts to arming critical opposition to undermine the government, especially at a time when all eyes are exploring winning strategies for the 2023 elections. There are ample examples of efforts of the NLC in Rivers State to destabilize the state. Now that the Chairperson of NLC in the State is also doubling as the governorship candidate of Labour party, and the same person is calling out workers in the state to embark on strike even when all the state-owned tertiary institutions are fully functional, it is obvious that this is another means to subvert the efforts of the state government at maintaining an uninterrupted academic calendar.
Besides, hoodlums have many a time hijacked supposedly peaceful strikes to advance their nefarious activities. Shops have been looted and the economy subverted. Many innocent people have also lost their lives these circumstances. There is also the likelihood that opposition politicians may hide under the cloak of labour to unleash violence on the people and jeopardize the peace that is currently prevailing in Rivers State. This is why it will be suicidal for workers in Rivers State to be used to fight government at this time.
Again, while we blame the Federal Government for the poor funding of universities, we boldly caution that it is not the mandate of ASUU, an assemblage of employees to dictate for its employers how and when to fund their own institutions. If they are not satisfied with their conditions of service, they should resign and seek better opportunities elsewhere rather than crippling the nation in order to satisfy their desires.
Nigeria cannot keep establishing universities when it has failed to maintain the existing ones. During President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration, 12 universities were established. Today, all are struggling owing to paucity of funds. Despite this challenge, eight bills are currently being debated at the National Assembly for the establishment of more universities. This is proliferation without growth. Yes, it is unacceptable but it does not require any industrial action to resolve.
The Education 2030 Framework for Action proposed two benchmarks as ‘crucial reference points’: allocate, at least, four to six per cent of GDP to education or apportion between 15 and 20 per cent of public expenditure to education. Government at all levels needs to meet these projections.
Even so, rather than enter into unworkable pacts with the unions, governments need to review the funding patterns of the universities. It is unthinkable that they alone can finance the institutions. In the United States, revenue from federal and state sources made up 34 per cent of total revenue at public colleges and universities in 2017, with other funding coming from tuition and fees, private gifts, self-supporting operations, and other sources. Nigeria can adopt this model to end the unending strikes.

Editorial

Improving Surveillance in Rivers’ Boundary Communities

Published

2 days ago

July 27, 2026

The Tide

The Rivers State Government’s promise to improve boundary security has given residents hope at a time when insecurity is becoming a serious concern. Speaking at the 3rd Annual National Assembly/Border and Boundary Community Stakeholders’ Interface in Abuja, Deputy Governor Ngozi Nma Odu called for stronger cooperation between the Federal Government, security agencies, traditional rulers, and local communities. The meeting focused on how better border/boundary management can improve security and support economic growth. Rivers people now expect these promises to lead to real action.

However, many residents are asking whether enough is being done to protect the state’s boundaries. Crimes that were once common only in some northern parts of the country are now being reported in Rivers State. According to the Nigeria Security Tracker of the Council on Foreign Relations, the South-South recorded 287 violent deaths linked to crime in 2025, representing a 19 per cent increase compared with 2023. These figures show that strong action is urgently needed.

Many communities, especially those near state boundaries, have little or no police presence. Some have no police post or station at all, making it easier for criminals to operate. The Nigerian Bureau of Statistics reported in its 2024 Crime Survey that only 31 per cent of rural communities in the South-South have a functioning police presence within 10 kilometres. This leaves many residents without adequate protection.

There are also repeated reports that armed herders have entered forests in the Ikwerre area and other parts of the state. If these reports are correct, they should be treated as a serious security threat. Many people say they face kidnapping, attacks, and harassment from armed criminals hiding in the forests. Slow official responses have increased public worry and reduced confidence.

Although the Federal Government controls the country’s security agencies, the Rivers State Government also has an important role to play. Governor Siminalayi Fubara, as the state’s chief security officer, should take stronger steps to protect lives and property. Criminals should not be allowed to enter the state freely while people live in fear. Waiting for others to act is like burying one’s head in the sand.

Security at the state’s boundaries should start with thorough screening of everyone entering Rivers State through officially recognised entry points. The Nigeria Police Force has the authority to carry out stop-and-search operations where necessary. Well-planned, intelligence-based checks can help prevent criminals and illegal weapons from entering the state without affecting lawful travellers and businesses. Weak borders/boundaries encourage crime.

Local government chairmen should also play a leading role because they are closest to the people. They can work with vigilante groups, traditional rulers, and community leaders to gather and share useful security information. According to the CLEEN Foundation’s 2023 report, Policing and Public Safety in Nigeria, 68 per cent of Nigerians believe that properly supervised community policing helps to reduce crime. Rivers State should make better use of this approach.

The Deputy Governor’s call for inclusive border/boundary governance should include local chiefs, youth leaders, women groups, and other community stakeholders. Their involvement will improve the sharing of information and make it easier to respond quickly to security threats. After all, prevention is better than cure.

The state should also invest in modern security equipment such as drones, communication radios, and solar-powered surveillance posts at important boundary locations. These are practical tools that can improve security in a state as important and geographically complex as Rivers. No community can truly develop where people live in fear.

Better security will also strengthen the economy. Boundary communities support farming, trade, and social ties with Abia, Imo, Akwa Ibom, and Bayelsa states. Insecurity disrupts business activities, discourages investors, and affects lawful trade. The World Bank stated in its 2024 Nigeria Development Update that insecurity at the state level can reduce local economic growth by as much as 2.5 per cent each year.

The Rivers State Government should, therefore, move beyond meetings and public statements by taking practical steps. More police posts should be established, community vigilante groups should receive proper training and support, and regular security meetings should be held with neighbouring states. The decisions reached in Abuja will have little value unless they are fully implemented.

The safety of Rivers people should never be delayed or left to others alone. While cooperation with the Federal Government is necessary, the state must take the lead in protecting its people and boundaries. If urgent actions are not taken, lawlessness could become more common. Rivers State must act now before the chickens come home to roost.

Editorial

A Fair Wage for Difficult Times

Published

4 weeks ago

July 3, 2026

The Tide

The latest demand by the Federal Workers Forum (FWF) for an upward review of the national minimum wage from N70,000 to N300,000 should not be dismissed as another routine labour agitation. Rather, it should be seen as a reflection of the deep economic pain confronting millions of Nigerian workers whose purchasing power has been severely eroded by inflation, rising living costs, and a struggling economy. Whether or not the figure being demanded is attainable, the message behind it cannot be ignored.

The decision of the Forum to proceed with a nationwide protest also underscores the growing frustration among federal workers who believe that repeated appeals have produced little meaningful action. Their complaints over unpaid entitlements, wage awards, promotion arrears, and other outstanding benefits deserve prompt attention from the authorities. A government that expects dedication and productivity from its workforce must also fulfil its obligations to them.

It is significant that the Chief of Staff to the President recently acknowledged that federal workers are poorly remunerated. Such an admission is welcome because it confirms what workers have consistently argued for years. However, acknowledgement alone is insufficient. Nigerians expect practical measures that will improve workers’ welfare rather than statements that only recognise the obvious.

The economic realities confronting workers are doubtlessly harsh. Food prices have climbed beyond the reach of many families, transportation costs have risen sharply, rents continue to increase, and the cost of healthcare and education has become unbearable for many households. Salaries that appeared modest a few years ago have become grossly inadequate in today’s economic environment.

Compounding the hardship is the persistent challenge of insecurity across the country. Many workers travel daily under difficult and sometimes dangerous conditions to earn incomes that barely sustain their families. The emotional and financial burden of this situation has created widespread frustration and anxiety, contributing to the tense atmosphere that now pervades the nation.

Against this background, the call for a living wage is both reasonable and urgent. The purpose of a minimum wage is not just to keep workers employed but to enable them to live with dignity. When full-time workers cannot adequately feed their families, pay school fees, access healthcare, or meet basic living expenses, it becomes clear that existing wage structures require serious review.

The Federal Government should, therefore, approach this matter with the seriousness it deserves. It should immediately commence purposeful discussions with organised labour and representatives of the Federal Workers Forum to examine realistic options for improving workers’ welfare. Delaying action or relying on promises will only deepen public dissatisfaction and erode confidence in the government.

Equally important is the need for the government to honour existing commitments. Reports of outstanding wage awards, unpaid allowances, and promotion arrears should be independently verified and settled without unnecessary delay. Keeping faith with agreements already reached would demonstrate sincerity and rebuild trust between the authorities and their employees.

That said, the workers must also appreciate the importance of sustained dialogue. While peaceful protest remains a constitutional right, industrial disputes are more productively resolved through negotiation than confrontation. Every effort should be made to avoid actions capable of disrupting essential public services or escalating national tension.

The leadership of organised labour also has a crucial role to play. The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) must rise and provide united, responsible, and strategic leadership. Workers need strong representation that combines firmness with wisdom and places national interest alongside legitimate labour demands.

There is no doubt that the government faces enormous fiscal challenges. Declining revenues, mounting debt obligations, and competing development needs make public finance increasingly difficult. Nevertheless, these realities cannot become excuses for allowing civil servants to sink deeper into poverty. Sound economic management must ultimately translate into improved living conditions for citizens.

In truth, paying workers a fair and sustainable wage is not only a social obligation; it is an economic necessity. Better-paid workers stimulate consumer spending, enhance productivity, reduce corruption arising from financial desperation, and contribute to greater national stability. Investment in workers is an investment in economic growth.

Nigeria can ill afford another prolonged confrontation between government and labour at a time when insecurity, inflation, and public discontent already threaten social cohesion. Both sides should exercise restraint, avoid inflammatory rhetoric, and demonstrate genuine commitment to finding common ground. Nigerians expect solutions, not endless disputes.

The message from the current agitation is unmistakable. The Federal Government must heed the legitimate demands of workers by urgently pursuing a new living wage that reflects present economic realities and restores hope to millions of households. At the same time, workers should keep engaging the government through peaceful dialogue, mutual respect, and responsible negotiation. At this critical moment in our country’s history, compromise, compassion, and decisive leadership offer the surest path to industrial harmony and national progress.

Editorial

Getting State Police Right

Published

4 weeks ago

June 29, 2026

The Tide

Nigeria appears closer than ever to embracing state police, a transformative reform that has dominated national security discourse for years. Such a move, however, requires constitutional amendment to eliminate existing legal obstacles. The National Assembly deserves commendation for expediting work on the necessary legislation to amend Section 214 of the 1999 Constitution, which currently provides for a single, centralised national police force. Having secured passage in both chambers, the amendment bills should now be transmitted without delay to the state Houses of Assembly for prompt consideration.

The urgency of this reform is indisputable. Nigeria has been grappling with terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, communal violence, and organised crime, all of which have overstretched the existing security architecture. According to the National Bureau of Statistics, Nigerians paid an estimated N2.23 trillion in ransom between May 2023 and April 2024, while about 51.9 million crime incidents affected households during the same period. These disturbing figures underline the necessity of strengthening policing through a more pragmatic and responsive system.

State police could remarkably complement the efforts of the Nigeria Police Force (NPF), bringing law enforcement closer to local communities. Officers recruited from within their areas are often better acquainted with the terrain, languages, and cultural dynamics that shape criminal activity. Such local knowledge could produce a more perspicacious approach to crime prevention, intelligence gathering, and rapid emergency response.

Critics rightly fear that state police could become instruments of political persecution if left unchecked. Unscrupulous governors may be tempted to intimidate opponents, suppress dissent, or influence elections through the misuse of security agencies. Any constitutional amendment must, therefore, establish firm precautions that guarantee operational independence and prevent such capricious abuse of authority.

Another serious concern is finance. Running a modern police organisation requires sustained investment in personnel, equipment, technology, training, and welfare. Many states already struggle to pay salaries and pensions promptly. Without reliable funding, state police could deteriorate into poorly equipped institutions that weaken rather than strengthen public safety. Fiscal prudence must accompany political ambition.

Nigeria’s ethnic and religious diversity also demands careful reflection. Minority communities in several states have legitimate concerns that locally controlled police could be manipulated against them during periods of political or communal tension. Recruitment based on ethnicity, family ties, or political loyalty would further undermine professionalism. Only transparent procedures founded on merit can cultivate an equitable policing culture.

Equally important is the need for a comprehensive legal framework to regulate state police operations. Clear provisions are required to define jurisdiction, disciplinary procedures, civilian complaints, accountability mechanisms, and the limits of operational authority. Without such legal clarity, disputes and uncertainty could quickly overwhelm the new institutions.

The relationship between state police and the Nigeria Police Force also deserves meticulous attention. Cross-border crimes, insurgency, and organised criminal networks rarely respect state boundaries. Unless command structures, operational responsibilities, and emergency coordination are carefully defined, jurisdictional rivalry could produce dangerous ambiguity at critical moments.

A fragmented security system presents another risk. Thirty-six separate police commands operating under different priorities and standards may complicate coordinated national responses to terrorism, banditry, and other transnational threats. Intelligence sharing between federal and state agencies must be seamless, timely, and cohesive, leaving no room for avoidable security gaps.

Human rights protection should occupy a central place in the reform agenda. Nigeria’s experience during the #EndSARS protests exposed deep concerns about police brutality, impunity, and excessive force. Establishing additional police formations may merely multiply opportunities for abuse. Independent complaint commissions, judicial oversight, and regular human rights training are indispensable guarantees.

Political transitions pose another challenge. Changes in state administrations should never trigger wholesale dismissals of police leadership or politically motivated appointments. Professional continuity, rather than partisan loyalty, must define career progression. Uniform training standards, ethical codes, and promotion procedures will help preserve the integrity of the institution regardless of who occupies government office.

History also offers a critical lesson. Nigeria operated regional police forces before 1966, but their widespread political misuse contributed to their eventual abolition. That experience should not automatically condemn present reforms, yet neither should it be ignored. Policymakers must undertake a judicious assessment of past failures and design institutions capable of preventing their recurrence.

Ultimately, state police represent an opportunity to strengthen security, but only if reform is pursued with wisdom rather than haste. Constitutional amendment alone will not guarantee success. Strong oversight institutions, transparent recruitment, sustainable funding, effective intelligence sharing, respect for human rights, and genuine accountability must accompany decentralisation. If these essential conditions are fulfilled, state police could become a valuable pillar of national security instead of another source of instability.