Editorial
Subsidy Removal Without Domestic Refining?

In the 2023 fiscal document presented before the joint sitting of the two chambers of Nigeria’s National Assembly, President Muhammadu Buhari proposed that the subsidy regime would end with his administration on May 29, 2023. However, not a few lawmakers vowed to extend the terminal date for the subsidy removal to the end of 2023.
The Minister of Finance, Budget and National Planning, Zainab Ahmed, disclosed that the Federal Government paid N18.397 billion in subsidies per day. The minister also stated that N6.210 trillion had been disbursed as a fuel subsidy to independent oil marketers from 2013 to 2021. This declaration has elicited reactions from some quarters who feel the subsidy figures are falsified, while others say the subsidy regime is unsustainable as it is hurting the country’s economy.
Recently, the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) insisted it was opposed to the removal of subsidy on petrol, if the country failed to refine the product. According to the association, with the government importing premium motor spirit (petrol) consumed in the country, removing the over N3.5 trillion subsidy would expose Nigerians to arbitrary pricing.
The Tide remains steadfast in this long-canvassed position that while the subsidy in its present form is destructive and unsustainable, domestic self-sufficiency in refining is the only lasting solution to product availability, price stability and maximisation of the benefits of crude. It defies logic that Nigeria, a leading producer of crude oil, bankrupts itself by importing and subsidising refined petroleum products.
It needs not be said that if the subsidy on PMS is withdrawn, it will plunge several Nigerians into extreme poverty. Recall that Nigeria has maintained the infamous title of ‘World Poverty Capital’ according to the World Bank since 2016. The World Bank data had shown that four in every 10 Nigerians lived below the poverty line of $1.9 per day. Sadly, efforts by the present government to address the rising challenges of poverty through the National Social Investment Programme meant to improve the standard of living of the average Nigerian has yielded no positive result for a project that gulps N500 billion annually.
Next, the current inflation rate of 21.82 per cent is believed will certainly drive more Nigerians below the poverty line by the end of 2023. Globally, economies are devising measures and approaches to cushion the devastating effect of rising prices on the disposable income of their citizens. However, the present federal administration has failed to assist impoverished and vulnerable Nigerians.
Germany, Austria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Rwanda, Ghana, and a few other economies are giving out financial incentives to households, cost-of-living allowances, unemployment benefits, an adjustment in wages and salaries, and the roll-out of public transport measures to reduce the impact of inflation. But the Nigerian government has been insensitive to the plight of the citizens, with much attention channelled towards the just-concluded 2023 general election.
Unemployment in the country increases by geometric proportion. The Nigerian Economic Summit Group (NESG) has projected the unemployment rate in Africa’s most populous nation to rise to 37 per cent in 2023. This means that the projected unemployment rate is about four percentage points higher than the National Bureau of Statistics data of 33.3 per cent as of 2020. Additionally, many state governors cannot pay the current minimum wage of N30,000 following financial constraints.
Marketers and other groups in the downstream sector of the Nigerian petroleum industry have said that fuel prices may hit N750 per litre should the petroleum subsidy be removed. Being an OPEC member country, it is a shame for Nigeria to remain the only member that imports over 90 per cent of its refined petroleum needs. The country has no reason not to return its domestic refining. The precipitous removal of the fuel subsidy without making strategic plans or giving particular attention to domestic refining is tantamount to strangulating hand-to-mouth Nigerians.
Nigeria’s energy crisis is self-inflicted. At home, the subsidy thrives on opacity, corruption, abandonment of domestic refining, and a shutting out of the private sector in the downstream oil and gas sector. On the international front, Russia’s war on Ukraine has triggered a jump in prices. Rather than reap a windfall, however, Nigeria’s indefensible reliance on importation is damaging its brittle economy.
Before the fuel subsidy is removed, it will be appropriate for the country to go all out to resuscitate its four comatose refineries and embark on building new ones to mitigate the consequences of the withdrawal. The poser here is: Why are Nigeria’s four ailing refineries yet to be resuscitated? Over the years, previous administrations and the present one have made many attempts to restore those moribund refineries. Unfortunately, they were all in vain, since some avaricious Nigerians sabotaged that much-needed valiant effort.
Certainly, domestic refining will firm up the naira; the total removal of the petrol subsidy will precipitate an economic recession. They should only withdraw it in phases accompanied by a vigorous programme to promote private refineries with incentives, privatisation, and the creation of an investment-friendly environment. The establishment of modular refineries should be approved. These refineries have capacities ranging from 1,000 to 30,000 barrels per day.
Our leaders may just be banking on the coming on stream of Dangote’s 650,000 barrels per day refinery now undergoing finishing touches in Lagos and BUA group’s oil refineries. Dangote industry said in January that the refinery would come on stream before the end of Buhari’s administration. Perhaps this is one of the ways Nigeria would escape the worst case scenario painted by industry watchers. The truth is, there is no alternative to domestic self-sufficiency in refining; that should be the urgent national priority.
Editorial
Fubara’s Infrastructure Boost For IAUE

Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, has unveiled a bold initiative to upgrade Ignatius Ajuru
University of Education’s (IAUE) infrastructure. This strategic effort is designed to boost the university’s capacity and position it as a leading educational institution in Nigeria. The plan includes a comprehensive redevelopment aimed at improving students’ experience.
This decision came after the university’s Governing Council requested urgent state government intervention to address critical infrastructure needs. Governor Fubara expressed concern over the current state of the institution’s facilities and emphasised his administration’s commitment to enhancing both infrastructure and education quality at IAUE.
The Governor has confirmed plans to construct several key facilities, including a new administrative block, student hostels, a modern health centre, and a sports complex. This extensive move aims to enhance various aspects of university life, improving administrative efficiency, student welfare, and recreational opportunities.
The prospective administrative block will symbolise a dedication to efficiency and seamless operations. Envision a modern, well-organised space where workflows are optimised, enabling university staff to concentrate on their core mission—supporting students and promoting academic excellence. Gone are the days of cramped offices and overflowing paperwork!
Students will also benefit substantially from the construction of new hostels. Many currently struggle with inadequate accommodation which affects both their studies and overall well-being. A comfortable and secure living environment is essential, and these new facilities will provide exactly that. It is like upgrading from a crowded dormitory to a modern apartment—an immense improvement in quality of life.
Access to quality healthcare is necessary for students. The proposed health centre will offer accessible medical services in well-equipped facilities which minimises the hassle of seeking quality care elsewhere. This spunk reflects the university’s commitment to student well-being, recognising that a healthy student is a more productive one.
Similarly, a new sports complex will be a valuable investment in student health, fitness, and social engagement. Beyond promoting physical activity, it contributes to a lively campus environment where students can relax, stay active, and foster friendships. Exercise benefits both the body and the mind, enhancing overall well-being.
Governor Fubara’s recent visit to the institution was more than a mere formality; it was a crucial step in assessing the university’s infrastructure needs. His firsthand examination of the existing facilities allowed him to attain a clear comprehension of the necessary upgrades, ensuring that the planned measures are both specific and influential—much like a medical professional evaluating a patient before suggesting therapy.
These initiatives will elevate IAUE to greater heights, fostering an environment that supports learning, research, and personal development. They will attract top-tier students and faculty to enhance the university’s reputation and academic excellence. Furthermore, the efforts will contribute to a broader vision for the state’s future, as Fubara’s commitment to education represents a strategic investment in human capital.
Ignatius Ajuru University’s infrastructure has faced several challenges, including overcrowded hostels, inadequate healthcare facilities, and a shortage of modern administrative spaces. This situation has hindered both learning and administrative efficiency. The new development aims to address all concerns directly.
We appreciate the Governor’s commitment as the first among past leaders to take concrete steps toward improving IAUE. However, we urge a broader approach that extends similar developments to all higher institutions in the state. For instance, Rivers State University contends with major infrastructural inadequacies, which accentuate the need for broad-based intervention. Ensuring fair distribution of resources across all educational institutions is essential for building a strong and inclusive education system where every student has access to quality facilities.
However, quality education must take priority. While infrastructure plays a role, what truly makes a difference is innovative teaching, a relevant curriculum, well-equipped laboratories, library, skilled lecturers—these elements produce graduates prepared for our interconnected world. IAUE requires additional resources because even the most modern campus with state-of-the-art buildings holds little value if instruction remains outdated or ineffective.
It is essential for both staff and students to show heartfelt appreciation for Fubara, considering that the new facilities will greatly enrich their time spent on campus. However, the responsibility to maintain these amenities falls on the entire university community, which must ensure they use them with circumspection to avoid unnecessary destruction.
To ensure that the ambitious projects achieve their desired success, it is crucial to maintain a high level of transparency and accountability throughout the construction process. Without a doubt, the proposed infrastructure will lay down a solid framework that supports the university’s growth and development in the years to come. This will ultimately encourage continuous progress.
Editorial
UNIZIK’s Expulsion Of Precious Mbakwe

The recent expulsion of Precious Mbakwe, a 300- level female student of History and International Studies of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University (UNIZIK) by the institution’s management for assaulting a lecturer of the school is a commendable sanction. The decision sends a clear message about maintaining discipline and respect within academic institutions.
In a letter signed by the university registrar, Victor Modebelu, and addressed to Mbakwe, the university said the students disciplinary committee found her guilty of assault on a lecturer, Chukwudi Okoye, in the Department of Theatre Arts and Film Studies. The letter further noted that the student violated the Students Disciplinary Regulations particularly Regulation 4 (SDR). This formal documentation shows the university’s commitment to following proper procedures in disciplinary matters.
According to reports, trouble started when Mbakwe pounced on the lecturer, bit him multiple times, and tore his clothes for allegedly interrupting her TikTok video recording along the Faculty of Arts corridor. In response to the uproar, the university management launched a full-scale investigation into the incident. The severity of the assault warranted immediate attention from the institution’s authorities.
We unequivocally condemn the offensive against the lecturer. Acts of violence and misconduct are antithetical to the values of academic inquiry and should have no place within our educational establishments. This physical attack represents a grave breach of trust and conduct, a violation of the very foundation upon which a safe and productive learning surroundings is built.
Such mien cannot be tolerated in any educational setting, as it undermines the principles of respect, intellectual freedom, and the pursuit of knowledge that are essential to our scholarly community. We stand in solidarity with the victim and commit to fostering a campus culture where such occurrences are not only unacceptable but actively prevented.
Mbakwe’s reported action is an embarrassment to the student body and does not represent the values of the Nigerian student locale, which emphasises integrity, respect, and accountability. Such conduct besmirches the reputation of not only the individual but also the broader pedagogical community, which works diligently to uphold high standards of behaviour, professionalism, and academic excellence
We urge the university authorities to take a more decisive action by involving the police in the matter. The serious nature of this episode goes beyond what academic penalties can address. Such action would create a strong precedent, reinforcing the message that violence is intolerable and ensuring that future matters are met with appropriate legal consequences.
The academic milieu must be preserved as a space characterised by respect and learning. It serves as a foundational framework for intellectual growth and the exchange of ideas. Universities, in particular, play a critical and influential role in shaping the future leaders and professionals of society. Given this paramount responsibility, it becomes essential to maintain high standards of action and foster an atmosphere of mutual respect.
Proper channels exist for students to raise concerns and seek resolution of issues they face. Students should utilise these official processes and avoid actions that could harm their educational prospects. The established systems for addressing grievances provide constructive ways to resolve conflicts without resorting to disruptive etiquette.
Respect for lecturers lies at the heart of meaningful learned discourse. When students show genuine regard for their teachers’ expertise and experience, it creates a habitat conducive to erudition and intellectual advancement. This means actively participating in discussions, meeting deadlines, and approaching disagreements with maturity.
University rules serve as the framework that enables thousands of students and staff to coexist and work productively. These regulations, from library policies to examination procedures, are not arbitrary restrictions but carefully considered guidelines that protect erudite integrity and ensure fair treatment for all. Adhering to these guidelines enables students to foster a structured and effective educational environment while enhancing their abilities in complying with institutional regulations.
The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) should issue a formal statement condemning this disruptive comportment and urge all students to maintain decent conduct on campus. The union must emphasise the seriousness of treating lecturers and university administrators with due respect, while fostering an instructional environment that promotes constructive dialogue and mutual understanding between students and the authorities.
This incident should serve as a learning opportunity for all stakeholders in the Nigerian education system about the magnitude of maintaining decorum and following established protocols for conflict resolution. It reinforces the need for continuous dialogue about pertinent demeanour in intellectual settings while adapting to changing social norms.
Editorial
Solid Minerals, Cesspit Of Corruption

The recent revelations by former Labour leader and current Chair of the Senate Committee on Interior, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, have exposed a deeply troubling reality in Nigeria’s solid minerals sector. His disclosure that former military generals and foreign operators have systematically seized control of the country’s mineral deposits illuminates the extent of institutional decay and regulatory capture plaguing this vital economic sector.
Minister of Solid Minerals, Dele Alake’s confirmation of these allegations strengthens Oshiomhole’s claims. The minister’s clear identification of “powerful Nigerians” as the masterminds behind illegal mining operations, along with their alleged ties to terrorist financing networks, paints a troubling picture of the complex web of corruption that is undermining national security.
The audacious manner in which these mining syndicates operate reflects their deeply entrenched position within Nigeria’s power structure. Their apparent immunity from prosecution or oversight demonstrates how thoroughly they have infiltrated key institutions, enabling them to continue their exploitative activities without fear of consequences. This systemic failure has persisted across multiple administrations, highlighting the challenge of confronting these well-connected networks.
Former President Muhammadu Buhari’s tepid response to detailed intelligence briefings about the crisis represented a significant failure of leadership. The current administration under President Bola Tinubu appears to be following a similar pattern of inaction, raising serious questions about the political will to address the endemic corruption. This continued paralysis suggests either inability or unwillingness to challenge powerful vested interests.
The grim contrast between enforcement approaches in different regions of Nigeria reveals troubling inconsistencies in governance. While unauthorised petroleum refineries in the Niger Delta face swift and severe military action, illegal mining operations in the North continue largely unimpeded. This disparity in enforcement not only undermines the rule of law but also fuels regional tensions and perceptions of discriminatory treatment.
Selective enforcement practices by the government have created a dangerous precedent. Small-scale refiners in the South face immediate persecution, while large-scale illegal mining operations in the North proceed with apparent impunity. The uneven application of law enforcement has exacerbated security challenges and deepened existing regional divisions.
Shamefully, the deafening silence from authorities regarding widespread corruption in the mining sector strongly suggests high-level complicity. The “conspiracy of silence” has created an atmosphere of resignation among citizens, who witness the systematic looting of their national resources by a privileged few operating outside the bounds of law and accountability.
Further compounding this crisis is the psychological impact on the Nigerian populace. The visible impunity enjoyed by these mining cartels has fostered a sense of helplessness among ordinary citizens, who increasingly view government institutions as serving the interests of a corrupt elite rather than the general public.
Immediate and decisive actions are required to dismantle these criminal networks and restore integrity to the mining sector. Superficial reforms or symbolic gestures will prove insufficient; what’s required is a comprehensive strategy to investigate, prosecute, and punish all parties involved in illegal mining activities, regardless of their status or connections.
No one can imagine the security implications of allowing illegal mining to continue unchecked. The illicit funds generated from these operations provide essential financing for criminal organisations and extremist groups, creating a direct link between mineral theft and national security challenges. Addressing illegal mining therefore becomes critical for both economic and security reasons.
Reform of the extractive sector must extend beyond enforcement to include comprehensive regulatory overhaul. New frameworks must be established to ensure all mining operations adhere to strict environmental standards and contribute appropriately to national development. This includes implementing transparent permitting processes and ensuring proper revenue collection and distribution.
Transforming Nigeria’s mining sector represents a vital test of governance and national resolve. Success requires not only technical solutions but also the political courage to confront entrenched interests and implement lasting reforms. The future prosperity of Nigeria depends remarkably on whether its leaders can summon the will to protect and properly manage its vast mineral resources for the benefit of all citizens.
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
Bayelsa, NEXIM Bank Mull Partnership On Exports Promotion
-
News1 day ago
Don Tasks Varsities On Artificial Intelligence
-
Business2 days ago
Dangote Blames Unstable Electricity For Poor Industrialisation In Nigeria
-
Sports1 day ago
Onyedika Not Sure For Super Eagles W’C Qualifiers
-
News2 days ago
Health Commissioner Tasks New Employees on Professionalism
-
Business2 days ago
LASG Arrests Illegal Dredgers … Issues Stop Work Order
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
Police Detain 5 Over Killing In Edo
-
News1 day ago
Okogbule Steps Down, Lauds Fubara For Support As RSU VC