Opinion
Drug Abuse: Bayelsa State At A Tipping Point? (I)
Last week, almost every major national daily reported the death of 30-year-old Daniel Celestine over a suspected drug overdose. While reporting the story, one newspaper reeled out a litany of similar circumstances in which other youths have recently lost their lives in Bayelsa State. With a little sifting of news headlines in the past four months, it became undoubtedly clear that something was amiss in the fight against drug trafficking and addiction in the Glory of all Lands. In the first instance, the current case was not that of a known addict or drug user, but a laundryman who ate food laced with a drug popularly known as Colorado at a birthday party. Only recently, a 300-level student of Petroleum and Gas Engineering at the Federal University, Otuoke, was reported to have died due to a drug overdose. But before that, a 200-level student from the same university was reported to have died in the swimming pool area of a hotel in Ogbia Local Government of the same state.
Last December, the story was also reported of the death of four internet fraudsters, popularly known as Yahoo-boys on account of a drug overdose. According to the police report, the incident occurred while they were celebrating an illicit financial windfall. Speaking to newsmen at the time of the incident, the State’s Commissioner of Police, Mr Benjamin Okolo, confirmed that the yahoo-boys died of drug-related complications after interrogating a friend who survived because of the limited amount of the drug he took. In spite of what I might refer to as the ‘garage’ of members of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency in Bayelsa State, there is palpable fear amongst residents of Yenagoa, especially. Their fear is that a deadly threshold has been crossed in the war against drugs and that the traffickers are apparently having the upper hand. In other words, the state is at a tipping point. Already, residents are calling on the authorities of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, NDLEA, and the Bayelsa State Police Command, to rise up to their responsibility and investigate the source of the killer- drugs referred to as “Colors”. For most residents, the NDLEA personnel in the state are deeply engrossed in illegality rather than the task of fishing out the traffickers destroying the state with deadly drugs.
As it stands now, youths are able to access all kinds of hard drugs on the streets, including Black Mamba or Colorado, Arizona, King Louis XIII, Gelato or Larry Bird, Forbidden Fruits, Gutter Juice, Cocaine, Heroin, Amphetamine, Ecstasy Marijuana, and other psychoactive drugs. The greater evil is the alarming rate at which young people are resorting to potent mixtures despite the high risk of fatal overdose. In The Tipping Point, acclaimed journalist and bestselling author, Malcolm Gladwell, described the concept of the tipping point as that magic moment when an idea, trend, or social behaviour crosses a threshold, tips, and spreads like wildfire. Just as a single sick person can start an epidemic of the flu, so too can a small but precisely targeted push cause a fashion trend, the popularity of a new product, or a drop in the crime rate. But in this case, the frequency of drug-related mortality in the State of Bayelsa is signposting an epidemic.
During a trip to Yenagoa last December, I was not sure of what to make of the NDLEA personnel I saw mounting checkpoints on major roads. It seemed completely out of place at the time, but in light of recent drug-related deaths in the state, it is all beginning to make sense. They already knew the state has been flooded with all manner of synthetic drugs, but I doubt if what I saw them doing on the roads of Yenagoa made any difference, given our present reality. At this point, the Governor, the NDLEA, and other security agencies in Bayelsa State should be worried, but parents, especially those with children in the universities should be the most worried. Why? They ought to be worried because what is being reported on the news is only the tip of the iceberg. If the general estimate is that only 10 percent of news is reported, then the number of deaths reported so far in 2023 does not bud well.
In the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, conducted by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and the Centre for Research and Information on Substance Abuse (CRISA), it was reported that South–South Nigeria had the highest prevalence rate of any drug use than any other zone in the country, with 16.6 percent or 2.1 million people aged 15-64 years in the region. Apparently, in 2023, Bayelsa is the epicentre. Many experts have theorised on the reasons for the high prevalence rate of drug abuse, or what has been termed the social determinants of drug use; and interestingly, the reasons or determinants are not markedly different from country to country, and in our own case, from state to state. Therefore, what might lead to an uptick in drug addiction in Rivers State would to a very huge extent apply in Bayelsa. This is more reason why the drug epidemic in Bayelsa State should be a major concern of every state in the Niger Delta, especially in light of the 2018 drug use report.
Multiple studies have revealed that people abuse drugs for a myriad of reasons; however, most of the reasons could be summarised under the following headings: Curiosity and peer pressure, especially among school children and young adults; the use of prescription drugs that were originally intended to target pain relief may have turned into recreational use and become addictive; chemicals may be used as part of religious practices or ritual; recreational purposes; as a means of obtaining creative inspiration; increased performance; to drive pleasure; and to enable relaxation or sleep.The 2018 survey also reports that the social consequences of drug use are very evident in Nigeria. According to the report, “key informants considered that there were major social problems such as disruption in family lives, loss in productivity and legal problems as a consequence of drug use in their communities. Also, nearly one in eight persons in the general population had experienced consequences due to other people’s drug use in their families, workplace, and communities.” The distressing part is that whatever the reason for drug use, in the final analysis, it ends up destroying the user and hurting their loved ones.
Driving this point home, the President of The Drug Salvation Foundation, Mr. Wilson Ighodalo, once commented that: “Drug abuse decreases a person’s productivity and challenges a community’s sense of security, love, and peace with one of the key impacts of illicit drug use on the society being the negative health consequences experienced by its users. They are susceptible to high blood pressure, depression, HIV, and mental illness”. If the future must be secured, then our state governments and the NDLEA in Bayelsa State cannot afford to go about the drug war as before, with the same ideology and tools that are unable to produce results in terms of saving lives by arresting addiction before it takes root.
To be continued in our next edition.
By: Raphael Pepple
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
Business4 days ago“W’Bank To Invest $14bn In Agric Transformation
-
News4 days agoNECO Opens UK Exam Centre For Nigerians In Diaspora
-
City Crime4 days ago
RSG Ready For 2030 Digital Transformation
-
Opinion4 days agoA Renewing Optimism For Naira
-
Business4 days agoFG Fixes Uniform Prices for Housing Units Nationwide, Approves N12.5m For 3-bedroom Bungalow ……..Says Move To Enhance Affordability, Ensures Fairness
-
News4 days agoReps Summon NAFDAC, Police, Others For Illicit Drug Probe
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
Coy Advocates Indigenous Innovation For Africa’s Energy Future
-
News4 days agoDangote Begins Refinery Expansion To 1.4mbpd
