Opinion
Condition Of Readiness In Political Maturity
There is a common idiom that a country gets the kind of leadership which it deserves. This saying of wisdom arises from an eternal principle which demands that an individual or group gets no more than what is commensurate with prevailing state of maturity and personal ability. This condition provides a safe guard for an individual and the wider society, so that no one is loaded with more weight than he can bear and manage. But there would be loading tests along the line, so that the individual would be able to grow in strength and maturity for greater duties.
In biological science, this condition of growth and maturity can be expressed as encephalocodal and proximodal laws. The brain plays a vital role in the process of growth and development, such that as a coordinating medium, it is the first and starting point. Similarly, the individual, as the nuclear or basic unit of every society, constitutes the most vital starting point of development of the wider society. This condition stipulates that development and maturity begin in the brain and the inside of every individual, and then manifest outwardly and visibly.
Along with this principle or condition of growth and development, is also another feature whereby people whose maturity-level and needs are similar, come together in environments most suitable or appropriate for their development needs. This would imply that people are born into such places and conditions where they deserve most to be, whereby their conditions and needs would be complemented by others of matching qualities and values, for a healthy blossoming.
Apparent conflicts, challenges and frictions which we find in human societies are some of the loading tests provided to facilitate healthy blossoming in developing and maturity process. Like William Blake would say, in his Marriage of Heaven and Hell, “without contraries is no progression”. Therefore, babies are born into such environments where they would grow up, to find and encounter such challenges which would draw out the dormant abilities in them. It is usually through the unique experiences which people encounter in life, that the best in them can develop.
These are some of the facts and apparent mysteries in life which everyone must know about, so that energies are not wasted in struggling against currents which can be converted into aids for joyful sailing. Conditions of readiness is applicable not only in political development and maturity, but even more in the development and maturity of every individual. Unfortunately, persons, agencies and institutions that should educate the masses along the lines of a healthy blossoming, tend to emphasise issues that are not quite vital. Looking in wrong places for our ills!
For example, there is an obsession with looking for lines of least resistance, the good things of life, but with little emphasis on the condition which make the individual ready for the goals longed for. Without such condition of readiness, a desired goal may be available, while the individual would be looking in wrong and distant places. Without an inward development involving increased awareness in terms of values, aspiring individuals expend time and energy longing and searching for illusory short cuts.
As it is with individuals longing for the good things of life, so also it is with a nation longing for viable socio-political development. There is always the illusion and false assumption that anyone can cheat and get away with such prank. It is one of the vital tasks of political leadership to map out a process of education of the citizens, the elite and the masses alike. It would not be enough for political aspirants to vie for positions of leadership and ask the citizens to vote for them. Such aspirants themselves must also be ready for such enormous task. You give what you have!
Readiness on the part of political aspirants would include a clear and comprehensive grasp of the biting needs of the nation and aspirations of the largest majority of the citizens. Similarly the parties sponsoring such aspirants should provide a road map capable of actualising the deliverables for a better Nigeria. Such clear roadmap forming a party’s manifesto, can then be used as the means of asking for the votes of the citizens. Political education would include mass sensitisation and enlightenment of the citizen as a means of selling the party’s ideology and its flag bearer to the citizens. Rather than buy or sell votes an ideal political education would involve a social contract devoid of fraud or getting away with any failure.
Nigerians who have listened to the issues of key emphasis by the various presidential aspirants would agree that the one hitting on cost-saving devices and reduction of the enormous cost of governance, is touching the root of Nigeria’s predicaments. If such measures can be implemented effectively, then a major ill of the nation would have been addressed.
The condition or principle of readiness in political maturity includes the truth that greed, gluttony and deceit are usually at the root of political failures. Similarly those who design, collaborate and perpetuate such system of political economy cannot be described as ready for political leadership. Thus it would be true to say that what we have had in Nigeria’s political arena have been largely opportunists, whose motives are personal gains. Another condition of readiness in political maturity is the concept of patriotism, whereby political leadership is motivated by service delivery and bringing out the best in the citizens. Not diminution!
Such key patriotic motives cannot be achieved by individual aspirants and political parties that go into the project with some hidden agenda which would veer from the social contract with the masses. Apart from the challenges of profligate spendings, high cost of governance and leakages in public revenue, there is a deliberate use of indoctrination as a political weapon. The purpose includes, using ethnic and religious cleavage as an instrument of power custody. A situation where some people are told that their pathetic conditions are caused by the activities and culture of other groups, cannot depict maturity.
A condition of readiness would include a mindset geared towards addressing issues realistically and finding solutions to them, rather than pass the blame to someone or something else. No matter the challenges that Nigeria has, with growing political maturity and readiness, they can be addressed with a leadership that is mature and ready.
By: Bright Amirize
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
Tompolo’s Visit To Bayelsa Bothers Coalition … As Stakeholders Want Security Checks
-
Oil & Energy4 days agoMonarchs Task FG On Host Communities’ Welfare ………As PINL Targets 2000 Women For Empowerment
-
Opinion3 days agoDon’t Kill Tam David-West
-
Business4 days ago“W’Bank To Invest $14bn In Agric Transformation
-
News4 days agoNECO Opens UK Exam Centre For Nigerians In Diaspora
-
City Crime4 days ago
RSG Ready For 2030 Digital Transformation
-
Opinion3 days agoA Renewing Optimism For Naira
-
Business4 days agoFG Fixes Uniform Prices for Housing Units Nationwide, Approves N12.5m For 3-bedroom Bungalow ……..Says Move To Enhance Affordability, Ensures Fairness
