Connect with us

Opinion

  That Tinubu’s Agric Sector Revitalisation Plan

Published

on

Hearing President Bola Tinubu during his Monday’s nationwide broadcast say that he had ordered the release of 200,000 Metric Tonnes of grains from strategic reserves to households across the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory, a co-bus commuter screamed “We get this quantity of food for this country and we dey here they die for hunger?” Recall that following the President’s directives, and subsequent instruction by the National Economic Council (NEC)  that the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) should start immediate distribution of grains to states two months ago to bring down the price of food items with a view to mitigating the impact of the removal of petrol subsidy on citizens, some stakeholders in the agriculture sector had wondered where the Federal Government would get the grains from, when many out of the 33 silos, most of which, had already been concessioned, were nearly empty.
How the Federal Government will implement its plan of supporting the cultivation of 500,000 hectares of farmland knowing that it may not have that size of land going by the land ownership system in Nigeria, where land is vested on the state governors, is also a big concern. The former Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola, once lamented that the Federal Government’s intervention in the housing sector was challenged by access to lands. “We have to bear it in mind that the Federal Government does not own land, it gets lands from States…”, he said. The point is that Tinubu’s plan to revitalise the agriculture sector and put agriculture on the right trajectory for economic growth is plausible, but it must be done with utmost sincerity and commitment.  And it is not a task for the Federal Government alone. The States, local governments and the citizens must be involved.
With the present economic situation in the country, the intense suffering and the obvious reality that the period of over reliance on oil is in the past, the nation and the citizens cannot help but adopt workable measures of improving agriculture in Nigeria. This will not only help with the economic development of the nation but ensure food security and take many people out of poverty, sickness and hunger. Before the discovery of oil in 1958, agriculture was the country’s economic mainstay with different regions boasting of different cash crops like groundnut, cocoa, rubber, palm oil produce and many more, thus, making agriculture a main source of employment, income and foreign exchange earnings for the nation. Today, with its abundant arable land and over 200 million people, Nigeria cannot feed its citizens, not to talk of exporting to other lands.
Successive administrations at both federal and state levels have claimed to be investing in agriculture with little or nothing to show for it.  Rather, the country has become one of the largest importers of food in the world.  All kinds of good items from all over the world find their way into Nigeria.  We import wheat, sugar, fish, milk, vegetables, fruits, rice and other food items which could be abundantly produced locally. We, as a government and people must think of ways of producing what we consume. Sometime in 2016, Benue State Government approved the declaration of every Friday as a work-free day to enable workers in the state work in their farms. The objective was to enable as many workers as possible to produce food to feed their families. Some other states like Ekiti followed suit. The civil servants in the State were encouraged to return to their villages to farm.
Anambra and Akwa Ibom States were said to be producing tomatoes in very large quantities and many private organisations got involved in farming. Has the tempo dwindled? Many countries have used a similar situation we are in now, to turn their fortunes around and we can do it if only we are able to reduce our dependence on crude oil and focus on other lucrative sectors like agriculture. Government should therefore encourage farming by providing modern farming implements to farmers to boost their production.  A situation where most farmers still rely on crude farming implements like hoes and cutlasses is most discouraging. Encouraging the adoption of modern agricultural technologies, such as improved seeds, fertilizers, and machinery, can significantly enhance yields and overall efficiency.
Farmers who are willing to expand their farms often complain of lack of support from banks.  Ensuring that farmers, especially smallholders, have access to affordable credit and financial services will enable them to invest in modern inputs, equipment, and technologies that can boost productivity. It is good that Tinubu has promised to do something in that direction.  Adequate investment in rural infrastructure, such as roads, irrigation systems, storage facilities, and electricity, is essential to facilitate the movement of goods, reduce post-harvest losses, and increase productivity. Many farm products perish in villages due to non-availability of access roads and transport systems to bring them to the cities’ consumers.  And yet, there are no storage facilities. That could be very discouraging.
Providing training and capacity-building programmes to farmers, agribusinesses, and extension workers can enhance their skills and knowledge, leading to improved practices and better results. Most importantly, addressing land ownership and tenure related issues, creating a conducive policy environment with clear and consistent agricultural policies can provide greater security to farmers, attract investment and stimulate growth in the sector.  Promoting and supporting agricultural cooperatives will enable farmers to pool resources, share knowledge, and collectively address security challenges. Cooperatives can also provide better access to credit, inputs, and markets. Reports have it that some Benue State civil servants at a point formed cooperatives, and loans were given to only groups that had verifiable farms.  Such measures should be adopted by other States to ensure that only real farmers and those truly interested in farming received support.
There is indeed a need for federal, states as well as individuals to show more commitment to agriculture, if the on going hunger in the land will be quelled.  The time of paying lip service to agriculture ought to be over.  Individual cooperative societies, clubs and other stakeholders should invest in agriculture.  This will not only assure an adequate food supply in the country, but will also create jobs for our teeming unemployed youths, reduce rates of social vices and crimes associated with unemployment. Recently, I met a man who used to work in a furniture company here in Port Harcourt. Three years ago, he was laid off by the company. Life became tough for him and his family. He said there were four empty plots of land close to his house. He negotiated with the caretaker of the land and he was permitted to farm there. He planted different crops, farmed snails and that saved himself and his family from dying of hunger.
Today, he has a large expanse of land in Igbo-Etche where he farms in addition to other empty lands in the city. He neither complains of hunger anymore nor lacks money to take care of his family’s basic needs. Some of us have spaces on our compounds, what do we do with them? However, one thing is certain, without peace and security in our rural communities; there can be no development. Farming and other agricultural activities which largely take place in the villages cannot thrive if the constant killings, kidnapping, cult war, Boko Haram activities, cattle rearers’ disturbances and other crimes perpetrated in our communities are not curtailed. The government should prioritise the improvement of security in rural areas, especially in farming communities. This can be achieved through increased police presence, establishment of military outposts, and intelligence gathering to prevent attacks and protect farmers and their farms. Nigeria can regain her pride as the food basket of Africa if the right measures are taken to revive the agriculture sector.  President Tinubu has promised to take the lead, Nigerians are watching to see him walk the talk and take the necessary measures that will relieve Nigerians of the hardship in the land. But it is not a job for the President alone. All hands must be on the deck.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending