Opinion
That Tinubu’s Agric Sector Revitalisation Plan
Hearing President Bola Tinubu during his Monday’s nationwide broadcast say that he had ordered the release of 200,000 Metric Tonnes of grains from strategic reserves to households across the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory, a co-bus commuter screamed “We get this quantity of food for this country and we dey here they die for hunger?” Recall that following the President’s directives, and subsequent instruction by the National Economic Council (NEC) that the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) should start immediate distribution of grains to states two months ago to bring down the price of food items with a view to mitigating the impact of the removal of petrol subsidy on citizens, some stakeholders in the agriculture sector had wondered where the Federal Government would get the grains from, when many out of the 33 silos, most of which, had already been concessioned, were nearly empty.
How the Federal Government will implement its plan of supporting the cultivation of 500,000 hectares of farmland knowing that it may not have that size of land going by the land ownership system in Nigeria, where land is vested on the state governors, is also a big concern. The former Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola, once lamented that the Federal Government’s intervention in the housing sector was challenged by access to lands. “We have to bear it in mind that the Federal Government does not own land, it gets lands from States…”, he said. The point is that Tinubu’s plan to revitalise the agriculture sector and put agriculture on the right trajectory for economic growth is plausible, but it must be done with utmost sincerity and commitment. And it is not a task for the Federal Government alone. The States, local governments and the citizens must be involved.
With the present economic situation in the country, the intense suffering and the obvious reality that the period of over reliance on oil is in the past, the nation and the citizens cannot help but adopt workable measures of improving agriculture in Nigeria. This will not only help with the economic development of the nation but ensure food security and take many people out of poverty, sickness and hunger. Before the discovery of oil in 1958, agriculture was the country’s economic mainstay with different regions boasting of different cash crops like groundnut, cocoa, rubber, palm oil produce and many more, thus, making agriculture a main source of employment, income and foreign exchange earnings for the nation. Today, with its abundant arable land and over 200 million people, Nigeria cannot feed its citizens, not to talk of exporting to other lands.
Successive administrations at both federal and state levels have claimed to be investing in agriculture with little or nothing to show for it. Rather, the country has become one of the largest importers of food in the world. All kinds of good items from all over the world find their way into Nigeria. We import wheat, sugar, fish, milk, vegetables, fruits, rice and other food items which could be abundantly produced locally. We, as a government and people must think of ways of producing what we consume. Sometime in 2016, Benue State Government approved the declaration of every Friday as a work-free day to enable workers in the state work in their farms. The objective was to enable as many workers as possible to produce food to feed their families. Some other states like Ekiti followed suit. The civil servants in the State were encouraged to return to their villages to farm.
Anambra and Akwa Ibom States were said to be producing tomatoes in very large quantities and many private organisations got involved in farming. Has the tempo dwindled? Many countries have used a similar situation we are in now, to turn their fortunes around and we can do it if only we are able to reduce our dependence on crude oil and focus on other lucrative sectors like agriculture. Government should therefore encourage farming by providing modern farming implements to farmers to boost their production. A situation where most farmers still rely on crude farming implements like hoes and cutlasses is most discouraging. Encouraging the adoption of modern agricultural technologies, such as improved seeds, fertilizers, and machinery, can significantly enhance yields and overall efficiency.
Farmers who are willing to expand their farms often complain of lack of support from banks. Ensuring that farmers, especially smallholders, have access to affordable credit and financial services will enable them to invest in modern inputs, equipment, and technologies that can boost productivity. It is good that Tinubu has promised to do something in that direction. Adequate investment in rural infrastructure, such as roads, irrigation systems, storage facilities, and electricity, is essential to facilitate the movement of goods, reduce post-harvest losses, and increase productivity. Many farm products perish in villages due to non-availability of access roads and transport systems to bring them to the cities’ consumers. And yet, there are no storage facilities. That could be very discouraging.
Providing training and capacity-building programmes to farmers, agribusinesses, and extension workers can enhance their skills and knowledge, leading to improved practices and better results. Most importantly, addressing land ownership and tenure related issues, creating a conducive policy environment with clear and consistent agricultural policies can provide greater security to farmers, attract investment and stimulate growth in the sector. Promoting and supporting agricultural cooperatives will enable farmers to pool resources, share knowledge, and collectively address security challenges. Cooperatives can also provide better access to credit, inputs, and markets. Reports have it that some Benue State civil servants at a point formed cooperatives, and loans were given to only groups that had verifiable farms. Such measures should be adopted by other States to ensure that only real farmers and those truly interested in farming received support.
There is indeed a need for federal, states as well as individuals to show more commitment to agriculture, if the on going hunger in the land will be quelled. The time of paying lip service to agriculture ought to be over. Individual cooperative societies, clubs and other stakeholders should invest in agriculture. This will not only assure an adequate food supply in the country, but will also create jobs for our teeming unemployed youths, reduce rates of social vices and crimes associated with unemployment. Recently, I met a man who used to work in a furniture company here in Port Harcourt. Three years ago, he was laid off by the company. Life became tough for him and his family. He said there were four empty plots of land close to his house. He negotiated with the caretaker of the land and he was permitted to farm there. He planted different crops, farmed snails and that saved himself and his family from dying of hunger.
Today, he has a large expanse of land in Igbo-Etche where he farms in addition to other empty lands in the city. He neither complains of hunger anymore nor lacks money to take care of his family’s basic needs. Some of us have spaces on our compounds, what do we do with them? However, one thing is certain, without peace and security in our rural communities; there can be no development. Farming and other agricultural activities which largely take place in the villages cannot thrive if the constant killings, kidnapping, cult war, Boko Haram activities, cattle rearers’ disturbances and other crimes perpetrated in our communities are not curtailed. The government should prioritise the improvement of security in rural areas, especially in farming communities. This can be achieved through increased police presence, establishment of military outposts, and intelligence gathering to prevent attacks and protect farmers and their farms. Nigeria can regain her pride as the food basket of Africa if the right measures are taken to revive the agriculture sector. President Tinubu has promised to take the lead, Nigerians are watching to see him walk the talk and take the necessary measures that will relieve Nigerians of the hardship in the land. But it is not a job for the President alone. All hands must be on the deck.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers4 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News4 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News4 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics4 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics4 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
