Editorial
Edugate: Intensifying Anti-Graft War
The prompt order issued by President Bola Tinubu to Nigeria’s anti-graft agencies for a comprehensive investigation into the financial operations of the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation is not only commendable but a much-needed step towards tackling the systemic corruption prevailing in the nation. The resultant suspension of its minister, Dr Betta Edu, further signifies the gravity of the issue and the commitment towards rectifying it.
However, the scandal has evoked an underlying decadence that seeped deeply into the country’s socio-political fabric, demanding far more than sporadic actions to deal with isolated incidents. The President should seize the opportunity presented by the uproar arising from the opprobrium to instigate a full-scale anti-corruption crusade. He should conduct a thorough scrutiny of every government department and their financial affairs.
Edu reportedly directed the Accountant-General of the Federation, Oluwatoyin Madein, to execute a transfer of N585million to a private account. This account allegedly belongs to Bridget Oniyelu Mojisola, purportedly identified as the Project Accountant for Grants for Vulnerable Groups by the ministry. The matter took a new turn when Madein said she declined Edu’s request, citing the regulation that public money cannot be paid into private accounts.
The suspended minister was implicated in yet another leaked memorandum for allegedly authorising N72million to her aides as part of the 2023 grant for the vulnerable group programme in Kogi State. This funding was intended for expenses such as flight tickets, airport taxis, local running costs, and Duty Tour Allowance, even though the state does not have an airport. Moreover, several companies were reportedly paid about N3billion as consultancy fees for the verification of the National Social Register (NSR). More worrisome is a leaked memo indicating that the Chief of Staff to the President actually approved the expenditure of N3billion from the COVID-19 Palliative Fund for the payment of consultants hired by Edu to verify the NSR.
This raises numerous ethical questions: Why invest so much money in consultants when the nation struggles with fiscal deficits? Why hire consultants while local talents remain underutilised and jobless? And more importantly, is there a tangible return on investment that can be traced to these expensive consultancy services? The absence of satisfactory answers to these questions indicates a blatant erosion of governance’s ethical elements — fairness, justice, empowerment, and most essentially, accountability.
The reverberations caused by Edu’s conduct and her subsequent suspension by Tinubu, bring to the fore the ongoing tumult in the nation’s political architecture. This uproar presents a stark reminder of the corruption and lack of accountability that has pervaded the political space. Tinubu, compelled, perhaps by the commotion resonating across the country, suspended Edu. Following this, penultimate Tuesday, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) interrogated her in Abuja. These events are emblematic of a renewed call for transparency in governance.
The President’s swift response may underscore his commitment towards promoting accountability in governance. But it also presents an opportunity for a cogent critique of the seemingly hasty action taken. Was this move just to assuage the outraged citizenry, or is it a signpost towards a sustained campaign against corruption and bad governance? While Tinubu’s action resonates with Nigerians and civil society organisations, it also raises questions about the transparency and accountability measures within his administration. That his Chief of Staff gave the nod for such expenditure leaves too many unanswered questions.
Even so, the EFCC’s subsequent interrogation of Edu in Abuja marks another noteworthy turn of events. This approach suggests a maturing investigative process geared towards achieving justice and equity. Simultaneously, it also indicates a potential shift in the fight against corruption within Nigeria. Again, we could argue that while such practices may lend credibility to the government’s commitment to transparency, they also expose underlying political intentions.
It is alleged that New Planet Project Limited, a company owned and operated by the Minister for Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, has been linked to Edu’s malfeasance. Ojo was awarded a contract worth N438.1million to serve as a consultant for the reputedly fraudulent National Social Register project, which aimed to verify 11 million homes in Nigeria within a month. The anti-graft agency must investigate him to ascertain the level of his involvement. Like Edu, Ojo should be suspended to facilitate a thorough inquiry.
Scrutinising the Tunji-Ojo scandal earnestly might lead us to various contemplations. We might start by questioning the ‘conflict of interest’, as the line between Ojo’s private and public interests seems blurred. As Interior Minister and proprietor of New Planet Project Limited simultaneously, it spills the question of whether national interest is sacrificed for personal gain. The contract might as well have been a smokescreen to siphon public funds, hence harnessing the wheels of corruption.
The Humanitarian Ministry has arguably been bedevilled with corruption allegations. The immediate past minister, Sadiya Umar-Farouq, is being probed by the EFCC, over an alleged N37billion fraud. The funds, intended for the betterment of Nigerians, were laundered through a contractor’s 38 different bank accounts. In 2020, the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) said it uncovered N2.67billion meant for the ministry’s school feeding programme in private bank accounts.
Unfortunately for Nigeria, a bulk of the poverty alleviation funds are loans. The country had borrowed $800million from the World Bank to cushion the removal of petrol subsidies through cash transfers to 50 million vulnerable citizens. The leveraging of loans for poverty mitigation programmes puts the nation in a precarious financial position, primarily if these funds are not appropriately utilised or fail to yield the expected socio-economic outcomes. As William Feather once noted, “borrowed money is the most potent form of mythology”, and Nigeria’s increasing reliance on loans to fund poverty alleviation schemes epitomises this concern.
The Edu case presents an arduous challenge; however, it is a challenge that offers a momentous occasion for reform. The choices made by the President will either bring about a promising dawn or cast an ominous shadow over the nation’s retrospective reputation. Tinubu must remember that his decisions will not only affect him but also the future of an entire country. If he takes a firm and rightful stand on these corruption matters, he can reassure Nigerians and the international community that the fight against corruption has truly begun.
And honestly, Mr President must not leave anyone found culpable in his government, no matter how highly placed.
Editorial
Whither Tinubu’s Duty-Free Food?
The delay in implementing President Bola Tinubu’s directive for zero customs duty and value added tax on food imports is unacceptable and highlights a concerning lack of urgency within the Federal Ministry of Finance and the Nigerian Customs Service. Over two months after the announcement, the policy remains stalled, despite the President’s clear intention for immediate enforcement. This prolonged delay, especially given the policy’s temporary nature (July – December), is inexplicable and detrimental to a hoi polloi already grappling with a severe economic crisis.
While the Comptroller-General of Customs attributes the delay to the Ministry of Finance finalising details, this explanation is insufficient. The dire need for food relief demands swift action, especially in the face of soaring fuel prices, rampant inflation, and skyrocketing food costs. The President’s promise of subsidised rice at N40,000 per 50kg bag remains elusive as well, pushing many Nigerians further into hardship. Accusations of deliberate slowdowns motivated by the government’s revenue goals are alarming and warrant serious investigation.
A circular from the Presidency has clarified the approved food items eligible for duty exemption, specifically maize, millet, rice, wheat, husked brown rice, grain sorghum, and beans. This strategic move aims to alleviate the financial burden on consumers and enhance food security. Previously subjected to import duties between five and 30 per cent, these commodities will now be more accessible, potentially stabilising prices in the local market.
It seems the execution of the policy is encountering obstacles due to bureaucratic processes. If the government fails to address this crisis with comprehensive and effective measures, the consequences could be catastrophic. The simmering discontent amongst Nigerians could easily boil over into widespread protests and social unrest, further destabilising an already fragile nation. Ignoring the cries of its citizens and the looming threat of social upheaval would be a grave mistake with potentially devastating ramifications.
Public officials insulated by privilege and detached from the everyday struggles of the people, have fostered a dangerous disconnect. For too long, they have failed to truly understand the harsh realities faced by the majority of Nigerians, the daily grind of poverty, the constant battle for survival, and the crushing weight of economic hardship. However, the current multifaceted crisis, with its clear manifestation of suffering, should serve as a jarring wake-up call, even to the most arrogant and out-of-touch.
The government’s ill-conceived and draconian policies, implemented without adequate consideration for the people, have created an intolerable situation that can no longer be swept under the rug or dismissed with platitudes. The widespread suffering is a stark indictment of their negligence, demanding a fundamental shift in perspective and a renewed commitment to the welfare of the Nigerian people.
The recent #EndBadGovernance protests serve as an obvious reminder that disregarding the plight of the people is a dangerous gamble. When basic needs like food and security are unmet, and the cries for change are silenced, the simmering discontent inevitably boils over. Escalating hunger and desperation create a fertile ground for unrest, a truth tragically illustrated by the protests. If the government continues to turn a blind eye to the suffering of its citizens, more widespread and possibly violent demonstrations are not only likely, but inevitable.
Furthermore, attempting to quell dissent through intimidation and persecution of protesters is a recipe for disaster, as it only serves to further inflame tensions and breed resentment. The path to stability lies not in suppression, but in genuine engagement with the concerns of the people and a commitment to addressing the root causes of their suffering.
The Federal Ministry of Finance, led by Olawale Edun, has a crucial role to play in improving the image of this government. Minister Edun and Customs Comptroller-General, Wale Adeniyi, must prioritise the fight against hunger by expediting the zero duty policy. This policy will allow the importation of food at a reduced cost and ease the burden on struggling families.
Officials must accord precedence to the well-being of citizens over bureaucratic processes. The current economic hardship is undeniable, and the callous indifference displayed by those in power, who seem shielded from the harsh realities ordinary Nigerians face, is deeply troubling. The government must act decisively to expedite this critical policy and provide the much-needed relief to a population struggling with hunger, poverty, and misery. Continued delay is a betrayal of Tinubu’s promise and a grim reminder of the disconnect between those in power and the suffering Nigerians.
Editorial
Whither Tinubu’s Duty-Free Food?
The delay in implementing President Bola Tinubu’s directive for zero customs duty and value added tax on food imports is unacceptable and highlights a concerning lack of urgency within the Federal Ministry of Finance and the Nigerian Customs Service. Over two months after the announcement, the policy remains stalled, despite the President’s clear intention for immediate enforcement. This prolonged delay, especially given the policy’s temporary nature (July – December), is inexplicable and detrimental to a hoi polloi already grappling with a severe economic crisis.
While the Comptroller-General of Customs attributes the delay to the Ministry of Finance finalising details, this explanation is insufficient. The dire need for food relief demands swift action, especially in the face of soaring fuel prices, rampant inflation, and skyrocketing food costs. The President’s promise of subsidised rice at N40,000 per 50kg bag remains elusive as well, pushing many Nigerians further into hardship. Accusations of deliberate slowdowns motivated by the government’s revenue goals are alarming and warrant serious investigation.
A circular from the Presidency has clarified the approved food items eligible for duty exemption, specifically maize, millet, rice, wheat, husked brown rice, grain sorghum, and beans. This strategic move aims to alleviate the financial burden on consumers and enhance food security. Previously subjected to import duties between five and 30 per cent, these commodities will now be more accessible, potentially stabilising prices in the local market.
It seems the execution of the policy is encountering obstacles due to bureaucratic processes. If the government fails to address this crisis with comprehensive and effective measures, the consequences could be catastrophic. The simmering discontent amongst Nigerians could easily boil over into widespread protests and social unrest, further destabilising an already fragile nation. Ignoring the cries of its citizens and the looming threat of social upheaval would be a grave mistake with potentially devastating ramifications.
Public officials insulated by privilege and detached from the everyday struggles of the people, have fostered a dangerous disconnect. For too long, they have failed to truly understand the harsh realities faced by the majority of Nigerians, the daily grind of poverty, the constant battle for survival, and the crushing weight of economic hardship. However, the current multifaceted crisis, with its clear manifestation of suffering, should serve as a jarring wake-up call, even to the most arrogant and out-of-touch.
The government’s ill-conceived and draconian policies, implemented without adequate consideration for the people, have created an intolerable situation that can no longer be swept under the rug or dismissed with platitudes. The widespread suffering is a stark indictment of their negligence, demanding a fundamental shift in perspective and a renewed commitment to the welfare of the Nigerian people.
The recent #EndBadGovernance protests serve as an obvious reminder that disregarding the plight of the people is a dangerous gamble. When basic needs like food and security are unmet, and the cries for change are silenced, the simmering discontent inevitably boils over. Escalating hunger and desperation create a fertile ground for unrest, a truth tragically illustrated by the protests. If the government continues to turn a blind eye to the suffering of its citizens, more widespread and possibly violent demonstrations are not only likely, but inevitable.
Furthermore, attempting to quell dissent through intimidation and persecution of protesters is a recipe for disaster, as it only serves to further inflame tensions and breed resentment. The path to stability lies not in suppression, but in genuine engagement with the concerns of the people and a commitment to addressing the root causes of their suffering.
The Federal Ministry of Finance, led by Olawale Edun, has a crucial role to play in improving the image of this government. Minister Edun and Customs Comptroller-General, Wale Adeniyi, must prioritise the fight against hunger by expediting the zero duty policy. This policy will allow the importation of food at a reduced cost and ease the burden on struggling families.
Officials must accord precedence to the well-being of citizens over bureaucratic processes. The current economic hardship is undeniable, and the callous indifference displayed by those in power, who seem shielded from the harsh realities ordinary Nigerians face, is deeply troubling. The government must act decisively to expedite this critical policy and provide the much-needed relief to a population struggling with hunger, poverty, and misery. Continued delay is a betrayal of Tinubu’s promise and a grim reminder of the disconnect between those in power and the suffering Nigerians.
Editorial
For Credible Rivers LG Polls
All looks set for the conduct of the Rivers State local government election scheduled to take place tomorrow in the 23 local government areas of the state. A total of 18 political parties will vie for various council positions in the polls to be conducted on Saturday. The Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC) had initially listed 19 political parties for the election, but the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) discontinued the contest. Chief Emeka Beke’s faction of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has said that it will participate in the ballot.
Ahead of tomorrow’s council election, various lawsuits have resulted in conflicting rulings about how the election should be conducted. A recent judgment by a Federal High Court in Abuja has prohibited the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from providing the voters register to RSIEC and instructed the police to withdraw security for the ballot. Similarly, the court has barred RSIEC from getting the voters register from INEC. However, in a counter ruling, a High Court in Port Harcourt has mandated that the state electoral commission continues with the election, requiring INEC to hand over the voters register and ordering police protection for the event.
As voters in the state prepare to head to the polls tomorrow, the conflicting rulings and legal battles have cast a shadow of uncertainty over the election process. With INEC and RSIEC at odds over claims regarding the issuance of the voters register by the former and security arrangements for the ballot, there is a need for clarity and resolution to ensure a free and fair election. The conflicting court rulings have added further complications to an already challenging situation, raising concerns about the integrity of the electoral process. As all stakeholders navigate these legal challenges, the focus remains on upholding the democratic principles and ensuring that voters are able to cast their ballots without interference.
Intense preparations have characterised Saturday’s polls. The election is expected to be conducted in line with the provisions of the Rivers State electoral laws. Speaking at a meeting with stakeholders, the RSIEC chairman, Justice Adolphus Enebeli (Rtd), hinted that the commission had complied with relevant sections of the law in all its preparations for the task. He implored political parties and politicians to ignore acts that could jeopardise the electoral process.
While we wholeheartedly endorse the move to ensure that democratic practice, norms and values always prevail at the local government level, we are truly elated by the level of earnestness and commitment exhibited so far by the Justice Enebeli-led commission to conduct credible, free and fair election in the 23 local government councils. Indeed, RSIEC can execute credible elections if it resists pressures from different quarters.
Despite the Federal High Court order, the state electoral commission’s parley with security agencies, especially with the police, and other stakeholders is, to say the least, heart-warming and reassuring. We expect this cooperation and partnership to continue even after the election. Going by Enebeli’s antecedents, we strongly believe that the commission will not fail to provide a level playing ground for political parties and politicians to test their popularity in a free, fair and tension-free contest.
The state electoral body must, therefore, strive to adopt an open-door policy where complaints would be entertained on their merit during and after the election. As anticipated, we hope the commission embarked on massive voter education and training of electoral and ad hoc staff that would man the 23 local government areas. It is advised that adequate preparations should be made for the security of sensitive and non-sensitive electoral materials, particularly given the tensed atmosphere in the state.
RSIEC is reminded that the success or otherwise of any election depends largely on the authenticity of the updated voter’s register which the commission has reportedly obtained ahead of the election from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The news that as many as 18 political parties in the state will participate in the council polls is cheering. The parties are urged to support and cooperate with the commission in ensuring a smooth and credible election.
It is expedient that Governor Siminalayi Fubara releases all the funds appropriated for the conduct of the local government election to the commission and ensure that he does not interfere in the workings of the RSIEC, or even influence the outcome one way or the other. Members of the commission should work harder to uphold the law without fear or favour; let or hindrance.
Incidents of missing ballot or result sheets, late arrival of materials and other logistics will only serve to discourage the electorate who already entertain a deep mistrust for the electoral process in the country. The lack of confidence in the system is largely responsible for the attitude of most Nigerians refraining from playing an active role of either voting for candidates of their choice or vying for political office. RSIEC must guard against those lapses.
Politicians, on their part, must understand that irrespective of their party affiliations, the common goal is the provision of good governance for the people. An election should never be a ‘‘do or die affair’’ and no aspirant is worth spilling blood for. Political positions are a call to service, not personal enterprises motivated by profits or bloody sports for which violent and fatal competitions are means. Experience has shown that arms provided for political thugs during elections, end up being tools for robberies and kidnappings after the election.
The idea of security agents acting the script of political actors should no longer amount to something in our polity. The nation currently faces perhaps its worst security challenges, and the police as well as other security agencies need the trust of Rivers people to enable them to carry out their duties effectively throughout the polls.
Law enforcement agents must protect both voters and election materials because it is their constitutional role to do so. The recent #Endbadgovernance protest, along with the violence that ensued, is a manifestation of the dissatisfaction of Nigerians with police operations. These security agencies must learn to commit themselves to their constitutional obligation and oath in the sustenance of democracy, rather than to any government official.
We must realise that ultimate power rests with the people, and the best way to exercise this power is through the electoral process. Hence, Rivers people must own the electoral operation, first by acquiring their permanent voters’ card, turn out en masse tomorrow to vote for candidates of their choice, and guarantee that their votes count. They have to elect responsible and responsive persons whose utmost interest will be the security and welfare of the people.