Politics
Good Governance: Clark Urges NGF Suspension
In an open letter released on January 13, 2025, Pa Clark described the NGF as a once-noble initiative that has transformed into a “notorious cabal” prioritizing political power over public service.
However, Pa Clark argued that it has since morphed into a bloc capable of challenging the federal executive and manipulating legislative processes, thereby stifling local government autonomy.
He criticised governors for reducing state assemblies to mere extensions of their administrations and positioning themselves for Senate roles, effectively turning the chamber into a “retirement plan” rather than a body of independent thought.
“The NGF was created to serve as a bridge between tiers of government,” he stated, “but instead, it has morphed into a force that undermines legislative independence.”
Reflecting on the NGF’s origins, he described it as “born of necessity” to foster inter-state cooperation and facilitate dialogue among Nigeria’s 36 state governors.
“Let us take a reflective stroll through the years,” Pa Clark wrote, emphasizing that while the NGF had noble beginnings, it had often strayed into political posturing and power struggles.
He drew a comparison to the United States Governors’ Association, which he described as a collaborative body focused on improving governance and serving as a unified voice for state governments.
“The achievements of the U.S. model remind us of what the NGF could have been—a platform for progress rather than contention,” he asserted.
Pa Clark highlighted a troubling transformation within the NGF over the years. By the early 2010s, he noted, the forum began to act more like a political bloc capable of challenging federal authority and manipulating legislative processes. This shift, he said, has led to serious consequences for Nigeria’s democratic institutions.
“The NGF’s ability to unify State Governors under a common banner could have been its greatest strength,” but instead, it has often been wielded as a weapon against constitutional order, Pa Clark said.
He pointed out specific areas of concern which include undermining legislative independence.
At the state level, Pa Clark argued that governors have reduced state assemblies to mere extensions of executive power. “Speakers and Assembly members are handpicked by the Governors,” ensuring unwavering loyalty and stifling independent thought or dissent, he wrote.
He also expressed concern over alleged manipulation at the federal level and criticised how governors maneuver federal candidates, particularly senators, to safeguard their political interests.
“The Senate becomes a retirement plan for ex-Governors,” he lamented, highlighting how this cycle entrenches personal gain over public service.
Despite his criticisms, Clark expressed hope for reform within the NGF. He acknowledged that critics often described it as “a notorious cabal,” but he believes that meaningful changes could transform it into “a force for good.”
He said he envisions a reconstituted NGF that aligns with constitutional principles and prioritizes collaboration over control.
“Reform is not an indictment; it is an opportunity,” he emphasized, adding, “It is a chance to recalibrate, to recommit, and to rebuild.”
In conclusion, Pa Clark made an urgent appeal for action: “The NGF stands at a crossroads. Its survival—and ours—depends on its willingness to reform.”
On Wednesday, the House of Representatives passed, through a second reading, a bill seeking to retain immunity for the Office of the President and remove immunity from the Vice President, the Governors and the Deputy Governors.
The bill was one of the 42 considered and passed through the second reading stage during plenary presided over by the Deputy Speaker, Mr Benjamin Kalu, in Abuja.
Sponsored by Hon. Solomon Bob (Rivers PDP), the bill is seeking the amendment of Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution to guard against abuse of office and to ensure transparency in governance.
The long title of the proposed legislation read: “A Bill for an Act to alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, to qualify the immunity conferred on the President, remove the immunity conferred on the Vice President, the Governors and their deputies, in order to curb corruption, eradicate impunity and enhance accountability in public office and for related matters.”
Key amendments include changes to Section 308 of the Constitution, which currently grants immunity to the president, vice president, governors, and deputy governors while in office.
The proposed bill will amend subsection 3 to ensure that immunity only applies to the President and the vice president when acting as President under Section 145 of the Constitution.
Additionally, a new subsection 4 will be introduced to make the immunity clause inapplicable if the office holder is acting in an unofficial capacity, engaging in actions beyond the powers of the office, or involved in criminal conduct.
“The bill seeks to foster transparency and strengthen the fight against corruption by making public officials more accountable for their actions, both in and out of office.”
“Section 308 of the principal Act is amended by:(a) substituting a new subsection (3) as follows: “(3) This section applies to a person holding the office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Vice President only when acting as President, in line with Section 145 of this Constitution.
Creating sub section (4) thereto as follows:”(4) The foregoing provisions of this section shall be inapplicable where the person to whom this section applies is acting in an unofficial capacity or where the conduct of the person is beyond the powers of his office or the conduct is criminal in nature.
“This Bill may be cited as the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) Act 2024.
The bill is currently awaiting further debate and consideration by the National Assembly.
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has written to notify Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the senator representing Kogi Central, about the petition by constituents seeking her recall from the national assembly.
INEC said it has also received the contact details of the petitioners.
“Pursuant to section 69 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, as amended, I write to notify you of the receipt of a petition from representatives of registered voters in your constituency seeking your recall from the senate.
“The notification is in line with the provisions of clause 2 (a) of the Commission’s Regulations and Guidelines for Recall 2024.
“This letter is also copied to the presiding officer of the senate and simultaneously published on the commission’s website. Thank you”, the letter read.
The letter was signed by Ruth Oriaran Anthony, secretary to the commission.
Meanwhile, in a statement issued on Wednesday, INEC said it has now received the updated contact details from representatives of petitioners seeking to recall the senator.
In the statement, Sam Olumekun, INEC’s National Commissioner and Chairman of Information and Voter Education, said a letter notifying the senator of the petition has been delivered to her official address, copied to the senate presiding officer, and published on the commission’s website.
“The next step is to scrutinise the list of signatories submitted by the petitioners to ascertain that the petition is signed by more than one half (over 50%) of the registered voters in the constituency. This will be done in the coming days.
“The outcome, which will be made public, shall determine the next step to be taken by the Commission. We once again reassure Nigerians that the process will be open and transparent”, Mr Olumekun said.
Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan had recently accused Senate President Godswill Akpabio of sexually harassing her.
The allegation came in the wake of seating arrangement related altercation between Senator. Akpabio and the Kogi Central senator at the red chamber
She was subsequently suspended from the senate for six months for “gross misconduct” over the incident.
The constituents behind the recall move also accused her of “gross misconduct, abuse of office, and deceitful behaviour”.
The senator has denied wrongdoing and called the recall effort a “coordinated suppression” of her voice.
The House of Representatives on Wednesday passed the second reading of a bill to upgrade the Lagos State 37 Local Council Development Areas (LCDAs) to full-fledged Local Government Areas (LGAs ).
The bill, was sponsored by James Faleke, Babajimi Benson, Enitan Badru, and 19 other lawmakers.
The bill is titled “A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) to Accommodate the Thirty-Seven (37) Development Area Councils of Lagos State as Full-Fledged Local Government Areas, Increasing the Total Number of Local Government Areas in the Federation to Eight Hundred and Eleven (811), and for Related Matters (HB. 1498),”
Once fully enacted, Nigeria’s total number of LGAs will rise from 774 to 811, with Lagos overtaking Kano and Katsina, which currently have 44 and 34 LGAs, respectively.
Proponents of the bill argue that granting full LGA status to the LCDAs would bring governance closer to the people. The 37 LCDAs were created by President Bola Tinubu in 2003 when he was governor of Lagos State.
However, it’s worth noting that the Lagos State House of Assembly has been working on a bill to replace the 37 LCDAs with newly designated administrative areas.
-
Nation1 day ago
South East Caucus Kicks As Senate Rejects Nwosu’s Immortalisation
-
Business1 day ago
Stakeholders Task Govt On Efficient Rail Transport In Nigeria
-
News1 day agoRivers HoS Resigns As Ibas Appoints New SSG
-
Featured1 day agoBring Your Wealth Of Experience To Governance, Ibas Tasks New SSG
-
Business1 day ago
Bank Supports Female Entrepreneurs With Grants
-
Nation1 day ago
Senate Passes Bill For Establishment Of University In Abia
-
Business1 day ago
Blue Economy Minister Charges Stakeholders On Africa’s Maritime Potential
-
News1 day agoNigeria’s Economy Achieving Stability – Edun