Business
Nigerian Content: ‘FG’s 70% Target By 2010, Impossible’
Nelson Chukwudi
More than a decade after the Federal Government began the process to ensure that the strategic oil and gas industry achieves 70 per cent Nigerian content in all aspects of its operations by 2010, the major beneficiaries of the policy have said the set target is absolutely not feasible.
President of Petroleum Technology Association of Nigeria (PETAN), Engr. Shawley Coker, told The Tide in an exclusive interview last Tuesday, that the “Federal Government’s target of 70 per cent Nigerian content in the oil and gas business by 2010 is absolutely impossible to achieve”.
However, the leading oil and gas exploration and production companies led by Shell and the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), represented by the National Petroleum Investment Management Services (NAPIMS), had Monday, assured they would do everything to comply with the federal government directives on Nigerian content development and the achievement of the 70 per cent target by 2010.
With membership of more than 40, PETAN is the umbrella body of leading indigenous technical oilfield service companies in the upstream and downstream sectors of the oil and gas industry, whose vision is the domestication of petroleum technology in Nigeria, and an arm of the very influential Oil Producers Trade Section (OPTS) of the Nigerian Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NCCIMA).
Coker spoke in the backdrop of the first-ever Nigerian Content Development Day/Exhibition, hosted by Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria in Port Harcourt, last Monday, which he described as a very significant milestone in the effort to facilitate the development of Nigerian content in the oil and gas business.
The PETAN president praised the doggedness and resilience of most indigenous entrepreneurs in the oil and gas sector, who he said, “are doing their best to make an impact in the industry, even as they face the turbulent and gloomy business climate in the country,” stressing that most of the indigenous service companies were only struggling to remain in business because the conditions in the country have failed to encourage local investors in the industry.
According to him, “the federal government is making mockery of the whole idea of Nigerian content. Why are they always in a hurry to set targets they know are not feasible? For the policy to achieve its goals, the government has to create the enabling environment for local industries to thrive. Until they muster the political will to take actions in the interest of the ordinary Nigerian, the 70 per cent Nigerian content target will remain a mirage.”
Coker noted that “the overall NCD goal is good and well-intentioned,” but insisted that the conditions on the ground, accentuated by “official corruption and lack of political will”, have made the government’s policy on NCD a mere mockery of Nigerian people’s desires for speedy industrialisation and economic development.
The PET AN boss regretted that most economic policies of the government were articulated and formulated by officials, whose innate interests are to frustrate emerging local entrepreneurs, bolster their political and economic influence, thereby stagnating the growth of majority of indigenous businesses.
He drew attention to the worrisome state of the steel and the wobbling manufacturing sectors, the epileptic power supply situation, which has inflicted huge losses on investors, the comatose and sorry state of infrastructures, particularly roads, and a litany of legislation working against the growth of the economy, as areas the government has failed to address, adding that except all the enabling structures are put in place, sound policy frameworks were bound to fail.
The industrialist, who has huge investments in the upstream and downstream sectors of the oil and gas industry in Nigeria, regretted that “most Nigerian investors in the oil and
Cornerstone of Financial Services
A survey of more than 1 000 global finance leaders undertaken by digital payment network Ripple shows that 72% of respondents believe they need to offer a digital asset solution to remain competitive.
According to Ripple, leaders from the banking, fintech, corporate and asset management sector have made it clear that the “digital asset revolution is happening now”.
“Digital assets are quickly becoming a cornerstone of financial services, underpinned by progressive regulation, growing interest from Tier-1 banks, a steady consumer shift from banks to fintech providers, and booming stablecoin adoption,” Ripple says.
The survey was conducted in early 2026 and the findings released in March.
Stablecoin Boon or Bane?
Ripple has experienced significant success in the stablecoin sector since launching its Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin in 2024.
With a market cap of $1.56 billion, it is considered a major regulated player in the market.
No doubt the platform was pleased to learn through its own survey that financial leaders were most bullish about stablecoins.
Roughly three-quarters of respondents believed they could boost cash-flow efficiency and unlock trapped working capital.
Ripple noted that finance leaders were thinking about stablecoins as more than “just a new way to execute payments”; instead, they viewed them as effective tools for treasury management.
In March 2026, Ripple began testing a new trade finance model built around RLUSD in a bid to increase the speed of cross-border payments.
The pilot initiative, developed alongside supply chain finance company Unloq [https://unloq.com], is running on the XRP Ledger inside a testing framework developed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
The Asian city-state is one of the platform’s biggest growth markets.
The idea behind the project is to see whether stablecoin-based settlement can streamline trade finance, too often hampered by reliance on intermediaries and slow reconciliation.
The only potential drawback is that if the initiative takes off, the Ripple to USD price could be negatively affected.
Ripple has always championed its native XRP token as a bridge asset, the “middleman” in the process of a financial institution turning dollars in the US into pounds in the UK, for example.
Ripple converts dollars into XRP and then back into pounds.
If RLUSD can do exactly the same thing, questions will be asked about XRP’s relevance.
That is a bridge Ripple will have to cross if it gets to that point.
Tokenisation Partners
Another interesting finding from Ripple’s survey is that most banks and asset managers are seeking tokenisation partners to help execute their strategies.
Some 89% of respondents said digital asset storage and custody were top priority. “Token servicing/lifecycle management also ranks highly for banks at 82%, while asset managers place greater emphasis on primary distribution at 80%,” Ripple found.
The survey also revealed that just more than half of fintechs and financial institutions want an infrastructure provider that can offer a “one-stop-shop solution”. This rose to 71% among corporate financial leaders.
Ripple attributes this to institutions and firms wanting uncomplicated, cohesive systems.
Infrastructure Rules
In its final analysis, Ripple says companies across the board are looking for partners and solutions that are “secure, compliant, battle-tested and that enable growth and execution”.
“The message is clear: infrastructure decisions made today will shape competitive positioning tomorrow.”
No surprise that this is precisely where Ripple is placing much of its focus.
