Opinion
Towards Achieving UN’s Water Target
About two weeks ago, precisely March 22, Nations marked the World Water Day in keeping with the United Nations Declaration.
The Day was also marked in Nigeria by the Federal and State governments, reaffirming commitment to the provision of safe, good, accessible and potable water for the people.
Resolution A/RES/64/292, United Nations General Assembly, July 2010 and General Comment No. 15, UN Committee on Economic,Social and Cultural Rights, November 20021 acknowledge that clean drinking water and sanitation are necessity to every person. This principle was established as a human right by the United Nations General Assembly on 28 July, 2010.
The Resolution also calls on states and international organisations to provide financial resources, help, capacity building and technology transfer to help countries to provide, safe, clean, accessible and affordable drinking water and sanitation for all.
Again, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted General Comment, Article L1. The article states: The human right to water is indispensable for leading a life in human dignity. It is a prerequisite for the realisation of other human rights.
This article implies that the absence of water is an infringement on the dignity of human life and conversely makes humans undignifying. The lack of water also means the failure to fulfil other human rights.
Comment No. 15 also defines the right to water as the right of every one to sufficient, safe, acceptable and physically accessible and affordable water for personal and domestic use.
That is why the ongoing laying of pipes in some cities, including Port Harcourt, for the provision of water to residents, though belated, should elicit joy.
As a member of the United Nations, Nigeria is a signatory to the Resolutions and Comments, so Nigerian leaders ought to have lived over board.
But taking a cursory, dispassionate and objective look at the water situation in the country vis a vis the untold hardship the people are passing through to access good and potable water, one wonders if there is anything worthy of celebrating.
That water is synonymous with life or stating metaphorically, that Water is Life is too obvious to be contested. It is crystal clear that over 90 percent of human’s domestic activities centre on water usage, making water indispensable and a basic necessity.
It is disheartening to note that though the underground water is a common phenomenon yet harnessing this natural and free gift for the ultimate benefits of the people is like finding the proverbial traditional needle in a haystack.
With the level of human adventure in science and technology, redesigning the environment to suit human comfort, reclaiming the mangroves to make it conducive for habitation, thus providing solution for land scarcity, the mirage of accessing potable water would by now be history. Unfortunately, the country totters on the brink of water bankruptcy, in view of the acute scarcity of water the people of the country face.
The story is the same from the North to South and East to the West. A country so endowed with abundant resources and underground water should not imagine interrupted tap runs 365 days of the year.
If the United Nations Declaration that there is sufficient water to meet the water needs of the about eight billion people in the world is anything to go by, the pertinent question every concerned people would ask is: why are people suffering in the midst of plenty? Why are we going through the harrowing and protracted experiences to access good drinking water in Nigeria.
According to a source, “overall household water use accounts for less than ten percent of total water use, while industry and agriculture are the largest water users. The right to water is limited to basic personal and domestic needs, which accounts for only an insignificant proportion of the domestic water use”.
By these statistical revelations and analysis, even in the context of climate change that affects availability of water, Nigerians need not lack water for personal and domestic use.
The inability of the federal government and the various state governments to make water available for personal and domestic use has triggered the thriving of borehole businesses with many of them substandard and providing untreated water not conducive for drinking.
The Water vendor business is now a very lucrative one, as people rely majorly on them for the supply of water for personal and domestic use.
It is not saying a new thing that some large families spend more than N1,500 daily for the purchase of water from the vendors. How much does a family earn to spend such whopping amount on water that ought to be provided by governments and non government agencies.
What is even disheartening is the inability of the people patronising water vendors to ascertain the hygienic nature of the water they are buying. This is perhaps a fulfilment of the maxim that where the desirable is not available the undesirable is desirable. To wallow in an orgy of hardship because of failure on the part of those who have failed to live up to their statutory obligation, is to say the least, unpardonable.
No doubt, the demand for water across the country makes investing in water and sanitation very expensive. Yet it is not contestable that the cost of not giving the people access to drinking water and sanitation is far more expensive in terms of the health of the people and its attendant debilitating consequences as well as loss of man-hours in the process of getting water.
With the abounding natural and financial resources, Nigeria and oil producing Niger Delta States should have overcome the challenge of acute water scarcity in this 21st century. Sadly, there are several residents of Niger Delta Communities, who for the lack of good drinking water,, depend solely on ponds, streams and gutters for water for personal and domestic use. The ponds and stream in which the people bath, wash and defecate is also the only source of drinking water they have.
In oil polluted water sources in Niger Delta States, the people are constrained to drink the polluted source for lack of veritable alternative.
We are informed by medical and health scientists that contaminated water is the harbinger of water borne diseases such as cholera, diarrhea, dysentery, hepatitis A, typhoid and polio. The absence of, inadequate management and treatment of water exposes people to preventable health hazards.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers4 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News4 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News4 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics4 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics4 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
