Connect with us

Opinion

Ahead Of 2011 Elections

Published

on

No nation can truly develop without the people having the opportunity to choose their leaders through the process of election. This is because election gives the people the opportunity to choose those they  can  give their loyalty. Inability to exercise this right makes it difficult for the people to be obedient to whoever is the leader.

Underscoring the importance of a free and fair election, the immediate past president of Nigeria Umaru Musa Yar’Adua admitted that the 2007 general elections of which he was a major beneficiary was marred with irregularities. This therefore set the tone for electoral reforms in Nigeria. The wave of electoral reforms swept away the then INEC chairman Prof. Maurice Iwu and brought in Prof. Atahiru Jega.

Ahead of 20 I I general elections, the need to have a free, fair and credible election cannot be over emphasised. Nigerians are yearning, hoping and looking forward to a time when election results will be a true reflection of the wishes of the people. They are waiting for a time when election campaigns will be based on issues and not on trivialities. Nigerians are looking forward to a time when elections in Nigeria will be on the basis of one man, one vote.

As we approach the date for this all important election which is expected to consolidate and deepen the democratic gains of our country, all hands must be on deck to ensure its realisation.

It is sad to note that in the past, the political parties and politicians with dubious characters filled our political land-scape, thereby making it difficult for the electorate to properly and rightly express their wishes. Corrupt men and women went about with bags of money, twisting the tide of events in order to perpetuate themselves in power. This has greatly robbed  Nigerians of the real dividends of democracy. It has continued to deepen the country into life of the world’s poorest country despite our huge human and natural resources. It has left our educational sector in shamble, our power sector in coma and as a result, massive unemployment and high poverty rate pervade the country.

The last 50 years of our nationhood has been 50 years of deprivation, neglect, marginalisation and high rate of human right violations. As 20II draws closer, it is important for the politicians to see beyond the present and look into the future. It is important for anyone who is contesting any electoral position to note that due to years of inhuman treatment which our political leaders had meted out to the people, Nigerians have become more aware of there rights and are ready to enforce them. In 2011 elections, money politics should be de-emphasised and avoided as much as possible.

The present administration has shown some level of commitment towards a successful poll in 2011. The express approval of the INEC’S election budget is worth commending. However, this is not a guarantee that the election will be a successful one because a lot needs to be done to ensure its success.            

The electorate needs to be massively educated on the need to participate in the electoral system, from the point of voter’s registration to the time of voting and the announcement of results. A reading of the mentality of the electorate shows a great loss of faith in the process, and believe in the power of one politician to determine what the out-come of the election will be in a particular area. This is not good enough to our electoral system and our democracy; it is the starting point of election rigging.

Nigerian politicians as well as the electorate should learn from the developed countries of the world like USA and Britain where election fear and pressure are not on the electorate but on the contestants to various offices. In these countries, money does not win election but the ideas and manifestos of the parties and their candidate are all that are required.

For 2011 election to be credible and for those elected through it satisfy the yearning and aspiration of the people, the opposition parties must be up and doing. They must not fail to always keep a close eye on the government to ensure they deliver on their electoral promises to the people.

A situation where opposition politicians and parties allow themselves to be bought over by the ruling party is a total disservice to the people.

As the all important 20II general elections draws closer, it is very important to think of what will be the people’s reaction if the results of the election do not reflect the true wishes of the people.

Recently, a media report quoted former American ambassador to Nigeria John Campbell as saying that the 2011 elections will cause Nigeria’s disintegration. This view may not receive the support of many of us, especially our politicians. But it goes to show the sensitive nature of the 2011 election even to the international community.

While we wait for the commencement of the electoral process, it is important for us to de­emphasise money politics and play issue-centered politics, politics that will seek for ways of tackling unemployment and reduce the high rate of youth’s involvement in electoral violence. Those who are aspiring to various offices must show sincerity in bringing the dividends of democracy to the people.

To have a huge free electoral process in 2011, security must be a top priority. The police and other security agencies must remain unbiased, as failure in this direction will bring to reality the fear of John Campbell. Officers and men of the force must conduct themselves in the best possible manners and refuse to be used to intimidate opposition politicians as well as the electorates. Also, the judiciary and the anti-corruption agencies should work together to ensure that politicians who are found to be corruption to contest any public offices. The plan by the code of conduct bureau to place a life ban on any politician who is convicted of any corrupt practice is a welcome development that must be allowed to stand if we are serious about winning the war against corruption. 

Finally, 2011 elections is one with high expectation from Nigerians. Nigerians are expecting an end to power outages, frequent strike actions by various labour unions particularly ASUU, NLC, Resident doctors etc. Nigerians are expecting our teaming youths to be empowered through massive job creation. Many cannot eat three square meals a day, no decent accommodation, no proper health care facilities. Nigerians are expecting that, come 2011 all these abnormalities will be rectified. Nigerians are expecting that corruption, which has been the prime cause of our misfortunes as a nation will be tackled with the utmost sincerity it deserves. Nigerians are expecting the in-coming government to be up and doing and give Nigeria and Nigerians something to cheer about.

Izejiobi writes from Port Harcourt.

 

Kingsley Izejiobi

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending