Opinion
Prioritisng Safety At School
Poised by the pains and
grief of the abduction of over 200 school girls in a government secondary school in Chibok, Bornu State, Nigeria, by the Boko Haram sect in April this year, the United Nations Special Envoy for Global Education, Gordon Brown, nursed the idea of a safe school initiative, as a panacea to the rising threat to girls education in the northern part of the country.
When the initiative was eventually launched in May 2014, during the World’s Economic Summit 2014 in Abuja, Nigeria, Mr. Gordon Brown said. “The first step in response to this crisis has been to show our support. The next phase is now to take practical measures to make schools safer. We cannot stand by and see schools shut down, girls cut off from their education and parents in fear for their daughters’ lives”.
Grace a dieu, six months after the launch of this all-important initiative, the first batch of the beneficiaries, numbering about 2,400 pupils was enrolled, during which the Finance Minister, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, expressed the Federal Governments of Nigeria’s determination to use the initiative to bring back hope for parents and children whose sense of safety has been shattered by the activities of terrorists. She also announced that 800 students have been selected from each of the three states worst hit by the activities of the insurgents, to be given full scholarship at 32 federal schools across the country. While we commend the effort of the Safe School Initiative Steering Committee, I think that the velocity at which they are moving needs be accentuated a little, especially given the fact that the insecurity situations in the country needs be tackled with great dispatch to fore-stall further loses.
The recent bombing of Government Technical school in the city of Potiskum, Yobe State North East of Nigeria, should make Nigerians and their leaders know that the safety of schools in Nigeria, especially those in the north-Eastern states is a concept that must not be treated with levity.
Six months after the inauguration of the safe school initiative in Nigeria, one expects a vigorous measure by the authorities concerned at restoring hope and faith in schools in the north-east to make real its intention of rebuilding confidence in parents over their daughters’ safety at school, by preventing terrorists from forcing children out of school.
Instead, what is witnessed is a scene that looks so much as a scholarship arrangement still in unsafe environment.
It truly the education system that has the potential to transform Nigeria must not be undermined, then the safe school initiative, which has what it takes to put Nigeria back on track and help more and more girls and boys go to school and learn, must be accorded the priority it deserves.
For me, yes scholarship could be part of the package especially for the already devastated and hopeless, yet, it must not be forgotten that the greater emphasis should dwell on school and community interventions, with special measures for the most-at-risk and vulnerable children.
We were told that the initiative would build community security groups to promote safe zones for education, consisting of teachers, parents, police, community leaders and young people themselves. This I consider key in ensuring safety at school and if such had been put in place, perhaps, the Potiskum School bombing would have been averted. What a loss!
The Head of Gender Parity and Skills Initiatives, World Economic Forum, Saadia Zahidi, may not have been in the spirit when he noted that,
“One of Africa’s greatest assets is its young people who will drive its future development. According to Mr. Zahidi, the safe school initiative can help Africa unlock its potentials and in this light could be seen as a crucial intervention.
For those who know the worth of education to humanity, no payment could be seen too costly for its preservation. Perhaps, that could be why. This Day Newspaper publisher, Mr. Nduka Obaigbena, while describing the reaction of the Nigeria business community towards the abduction of over 200 school girls in Chibok, in April, which he described as a reflection of the threat to education to Nigeria, said, “the greater danger is in the fear of going to school. We could lose a generation of children who are afraid of going to school,” he warned.
However, if anything has to be done at all, then such deserves to be done well. We cannot wait to make our citadels of learning safe when there will be obviously no souls to attend them. The time to save our education system, our children and our future is now! A stitch in time saves nine.
Sylvia ThankGod –Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education1 day agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta1 day ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers1 day ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education1 day agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
