Opinion
Nigeria’s Independence In Retrospect
Whenever I think about the fact that Nigeria is 57 years old, it plays back memories of our huge and untapped resources and potentialities. It creates in me imageries and mixed feelings.
I am amused when some people compare Nigeria to the advanced world and claim that after all they also passed through our stage and that they were in our situation some years ago. For these ones, Nigeria is like Rome that was not built in a day. This argument, for me, is untenable for a country at 57.
Take Singapore as an example. This country gained independence in 1962, two years after Nigeria. But see where they are today. Singapore has left us far behind while we still crawl and embark on forward and backward movements.
It is not in doubt that Nigeria has numerous problems some of which are self-inflicted. But so are other nations. Right now, the country is bugged by agitations of all kinds. There are agitations for secession, agitations for restructuring while religious and ethnic embers are fanned daily.
All these calls and agitations threaten our unity and weaken the bonds that tie us together. Progress is hardly achievable in the midst of these grievances. We must therefore put our house in order. In doing this, we must work out parameters that will ensure equitability and fairness in the country.
For any change to take place in the country, good leadership must be put in the front burner. This is because effective leadership is the foundation of good governance globally. And every good governance must be characterized by accountability, transparency, honesty, integrity and good planning.
Of course, a good government must respect freedom of the press and the rule of law. Corruption must never be tolerated in any guise. These facts are necessary if we have to attain a strong nationhood.
Another issue that stunts our growth as a nation is the type of federalism we practice. Our kind of federal system is unique. I don’t know how anyone can describe the kind of federal system that is practiced here. Is it military federalism or unitary federalism as some people prefer to call it? But if it is unitary federalism, is it not a contradiction in terms?
This type of federalism is too bogus and takes so much of our resources to implement. A system of this kind is enough to ground our economy and deny us development. See the expenses that go into recurrent spending alone. No nation can develop at this rate.
I advocate a massive reduction of our spending on governance. In other words, the cost of running government should be reduced. If this will take us to change the system of government we have here, so be it. As a nation, we have tried parliamentary system of government and we are currently practicing presidential system.
Given our experience of the two, we are now in a position to choose anyone of them. The parliamentary system for me is preferred because it is economical and less bogus. Not much money is required to run this system. With all its disadvantages, the parliamentary kind of government is more suitable for us.
The question we should ask ourselves is, what has both the presidential system and our so-called federalism benefitted us? Can anyone point to significant development 57 years after independence? None; and the reason is attributable to the structure of government we have in place.
Our brand of federalism is faulty. It will not give us development. Rather, we shall continue to retrogress in all aspects. Therefore, let’s consider some of the calls or agitations that saturate the air. For instance, the call for true federalism should be heeded. With the aid of true federalism, not only will the component parts of the country be competitive economically the nation will experience constitutionalism.
We have been depending on crude oil for the past many years with nothing to show for it except corruption. Or can anyone point to what crude oil has given us in this country except agitations, militancy and corruption? It is time to drive an alternative to oil and that is agriculture. I am glad at the news that oil will soon be out of demand. This will compel us to look elsewhere. As I said earlier, agriculture remains the best alternative to oil. We must develop that sector if we have to survive as a nation.
Similarly, a country at 57 with dysfunctional education system is as good as dead. That is our story as a nation. When education is deficient as it is in our country, what will drive development? Is it corruption and greed or ethnicity and religious fanaticism? Surely, it is none of them. That is why at 57, this nation ought to be an exporter of education, science and technology.
It is also a shame that a nation as big and old as Nigeria lacks viable youth’s policy. If I may ask, what programme does this country have for its youth? I am certain there is none. The future of every country is the youths. That is why they must be developed and prepared for leadership. Don’t forget that the founding fathers of Nigeria (Azikiwe, Awolowo and Balewa) were all youths when they faced the British and got independence for us.
As we bask in the euphoria of our 57years of existence as a nation, let our leaders and all Nigerians bear in mind that we owe this country a sacred duty of ensuring that it remains one indivisible country. But that doesn’t mean that our leaders will not pay attention to agitations and cries against marginalization. They should without compromising the unity of the country.
Udofia is a student of Western Delta University
Ima-Obong Udofia
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Sports3 days agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports3 days agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports3 days agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Sports3 days agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Sports3 days agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
-
Sports3 days agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports3 days agoPalmer Stars As Chelsea Compound Wolves Woes
-
Sports3 days agoBarca Pull Out Of Super League Project
