Connect with us

Opinion

 Taking  Nigeria’s  Education Beyond Curriculum

Published

on

The current Minister of Education, Prof. Tahir Mamman, has so far taken some steps which give hope of the revival of Nigeria’s education sector in the near future. He recently inaugurated an eight man committee to set up a roadmap for the education sector in the country which he said was in line with the ‘Renewed Hope’ agenda of President Bola Tinubu. Among the committee’s mandate is to come up with a curriculum from basic to tertiary level that meets the demands of the current times and needs of Nigerian society. The committee is to also look into the issues of financial autonomy in tertiary institutions, access and equity, research and innovation as well as the government-industry-academic nexus.
The minister emphasised that “One thing I must not fail to add is that we must have an education system that embraces technology and moves into a digital future where our education responds to the demands of society. We need to move away from education for its sake to education for the development, not only of the individual but most importantly, of the society we live in.” Similarly, earlier in the week, the National Universities Commission (NUC) launched a newly restructured curriculum for Nigerian universities, called the Core Curriculum and Minimum Academic Standards (CCMAS). The new curriculum which replaces the Benchmark Minimum Academic Standards (BMAS) and is aimed at making university education in Nigeria more responsive to the needs of the society is to take effect from this month.
According to the NUC, the CCMAS is designed to reflect the 21st Century realities, in the existing and new disciplines and programmes in the Nigerian University System and is structured to provide for 70 percent of core courses for each programme, while allowing universities to utilise the remaining 30 percent for other innovative courses in their peculiar areas of focus. Although bodies like the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) have kicked against the new curriculum, describing it as a threat to university autonomy and that universities are statutorily responsible for academic programme development “instead of the top-to-bottom model used for the CCMAS”, the minister of education and some other stakeholders in the education sector have applauded NUC’s initiative, saying it is welcomed novel idea which would impact positively on Nigerian Universities.
Knowing Mamman’s pedigree and his track records of excellence in the education sector, there is no doubt that he will leave no stone unturned in ensuring that the right teachings are impacted on the Nigerian child and that quality education that will lead to the development of the citizens and the country is achieved. There have been calls for a comprehensive overhaul of the Nigerian education system both from the policy direction and in the area of standard. The introduction of the 6-3-3-4 system over 20 years ago was the last major tweak in our education system and many believed that there is a need to take a critical look at what obtains in our schools and have a system change since the current one has obviously failed.
It is a known fact that many graduates of secondary and tertiary education in Nigeria lack employable and requisite skills to function well in the society. No thanks to the doctrinal curriculum, poor quality of teachers, lack of infrastructure and other challenges bedevilling the education sector. The founder, Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti (ABUAD), Chief Afe Babalola, recently described the curriculum being used in schools as outdated, lamenting that several attempts at reviewing them over the years have not achieved desired results. However, to achieve the set goal, there is the need to embrace creativity in the teaching profession. The average Nigerian child is encumbered with a lot of learning. In many schools across the country, pupils and students are subjected to several hours of sitting down and listening to teachers talk with rarely an opportunity for practical.
For learning to be impactful a child should be exposed to the practical aspect of it. This makes it important and necessary that teachers should acquire practical skills in order to adequately pass on knowledge to the child. Aside from sitting in rows at desks, dutifully listening and recording what the teachers have to say, it is important that teachers employ the needed skills in offering every child a rich, rewarding and unique learning experience. Experts believe that the role of teachers in a child’s education has been fundamentally compromised, making the education environment go beyond the classroom to the home, the community and the world around. On the other hand, information no longer abounds primarily in books but is now available everywhere in bits and bytes as such following the education curriculum religiously to the end may not be the   major requirement for a child’s development.
Educationists have always emphasised the need for teachers to be more creative in order to impact positively on a child. They say the transformative teacher is a creative teacher; that practical experiences and explanations while teaching tend to stick deeply with children and that it takes a creative teacher to give young people rich experiences that stay with them for life. “A teacher who practicalises his subjects makes it easier for the children to understand. “When the curriculum is followed as it is, without the teacher thinking creatively and engaging the kids, to enable them to relate with the topic, the child will find it difficult to grasp the subject.”
Associate Professor of Childhood Education, Tai Solarin University of Education, Ogun State, Dr Adefunke Ekine, identified ages zero to eight as the most critical in the developmental stages of a child. She said that the psychological makeup of the teacher handling children within this age bracket is very critical. According to her, about 90 per cent of children’s brains are developed within this age bracket; hence the need for a creative teacher or care giver. Why do primary and secondary school students perceive science subjects as abstract and difficult to understand? It is because of the way some teachers teach the subjects. Teachers should therefore, develop problem solving skills and not just teach the subjects as an abstract.
Teachers, especially at primary school level, must influence pupils to love Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) which are critical in instilling passion for innovation. There is also the need for regular training of teachers, prompt payment of their salaries and adequate catering for their welfare to enable them to impact knowledge on the children creatively and enthusiastically. This will also attract qualified hands into the teaching profession. The nation cannot continue to prioritise politics to the detriment of health, education and other sectors and expect the best from them. In the twilight of the immediate past administration, the former Minister of Education, Adamu Adamu, disclosed that the federal government had approved a new National Language Policy which would make mother tongue a compulsory medium of instruction for public primary school pupils.
According to him, mother tongue would be used exclusively for the first six years of education, while it will be combined with English Language from Junior Secondary School. He said that the mother tongue to be used in each school will be the dominant language spoken by the community where it is located. Nigerians expect to see this incorporated into the schools’ curriculum that is underway. Nigerians will also want to see a curriculum that deemphasises examination rankings and certificates. Nigeria should toe the line of Singapore where school examination rankings had been abolished. Nigerian schools, especially the private schools should stop making the children see learning as a competition but a self-discipline they need to master for life. Of course, the report book should still contain some form of yardstick and information to allow students to judge their relative performance, and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses but no to exam rankings. Our schools and teachers should rather concentrate on imparting knowledge on the children in the most fun and interesting way. This will pay the children, their parents and the nation more in the long run.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending