Opinion
Pipeline Leakages And Fire, Past 25 Years
The most recent alarm about leaking pipeline raised by community members this month was in Omoku in Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area in Rivers State. A clergyman operating an orphanage close to the scene of pipeline leakage made a pathetic appeal for an immediate intervention by appropriate authorities, in the interest of many children in the orphanage. There had been similar reported cases in various parts of Rivers State; neither must all such reported cases of pipeline leakages be associated with oil bunkering or sabotage. In this case of Omoku leakage, there is present danger, apart from several people moving away from the scene. It is sad that in the past 25 years there have been numerous cases of pipeline leakages and fire in Nigeria. October 18, 1998, it was reported that 1,082 persons died at Jesse, Delta State, as a result of pipeline fire. June 25, 1999, 15 persons were reported to have been burnt alive at Akute-Odo, Lagos. February 7, 2000, 17 persons died in Ogwe, Abia State, from pipeline fire, and March 20, same year and close to Isioma, Abia State, no fewer than 20 persons died in similar sad incident. June 21, 2000, 28 persons were burnt to death at Okuedjeba near Warri, in Delta State.
July 11, 2000, nearly 300 people reportedly died from pipeline fires in Warri, Delta State, and on 23 July 2000, 40 people died at Afrokpe near Sapele, Delta State, with another 15 persons the next day in a second blast. Then November 30, 2000, about 60 people died when a damaged pipeline exploded near Lagos. Total of six pipeline fire in 2000 alone! November 15, 2001, 15 people died in a fire caused by an oil leak at Umudike, Imo State; but in the whole of 2002, there was no such tragedy. Then June 19, 2003, 125 people died by a pipeline explosion in Ovim, Abia State. September 16, 2004, 60 people died in pipeline blast in the outskirts of Lagos; and December 22, 2004, 27 persons died as villagers scooped fuel from a damaged pipeline at Ilado near Lagos. May 30, 2005, a pipeline burst into flames after a gang tapped into it to illegally siphon off fuel in the town of Awokan, killing six persons. December 20, 2005, militants blew up a Royal Dutch Shell pipeline, about 50 kilometres southwest of the Southern oil centre of Port Harcourt, killing 8 people. Then May 12, 2006, about 200 people were reportedly burnt alive in an inferno at a beach near Lagos; same May 12, 2006, a ruptured gas pipeline ignited, killing villagers collecting fuel in the southern village of Ilado, Lagos. It was estimated that the total number of people that died in that inferno was more than 200.
December 26, 2006, a day after Christmas, it was reported that hundreds of persons were killed by fire as a pipeline exploded in Abule Egba, Lagos. It was alleged that some of the victims of that sad incident were in festive attire, celebrating a boxing day as a Christmas holiday. One year after, another December 25, 2007, Christmas day proper, 47 people were reported to have died at a village near Ikate on Atlas Cove, Mosimi line in Iru Council of Lagos State. Between 2008 and 2018, records of pipeline fire are being verified for compilation, but the above history of pipeline fires in Nigeria is shocking enough. It is needful that urgent and prompt attention should be given to cases of pipeline leakages reported by indigenes of rural communities, by appropriate authorities, without waiting for disasters to occur. The tendency to associate broken or leaking pipelines to oil bunkering or sabotage, and perhaps suspect villagers in such vicinity as being responsible for any illegality, may not always be the case. While illegality and sabotage may not be ruled out in cases of damage to pipelines, what should demand immediate attention and action, is to ensure that fire which can put human lives in jeopardy, does not erupt from leaking pipelines.
With the most recent incident in Omoku (ONELGA) as a case study, the observation has been that rapid response and action rarely follow reports or alarm about a leaking pipeline. It is a sad habit to consider the status or outward appearance of a messenger first, before considering what importance to attach to the message being conveyed. Neither must a village woman who saw crude oil gushing out from the soil as she was harvesting cassava in her farm, be accused of bursting a pipeline with her hoe! Even when cases of oil spill are reported from the grassroots and channelled through a local government chairman or any public notary, there is always a tendency to bring some politics into such matter. Such political twist comes in the form of recriminations and accusations about collaborations by local indigenes in illegality of oil thieves. People of the Niger Delta region have had enough of sad experiences of natural resources that should have been a blessing to them. Rather, they suffer in silence.
It is sad to observe that in the past 25 years, apart from cases of pipeline fire disasters and increasing terrorism, banditry and gangsterism, land-grabbing is another looming disaster in the Niger Delta region. A Land Use Decree of 1969, may have been necessitated by a strategy to win the Nigeria Civil War (1967 – 1970), under a military regime. As Land Use Act by a democratic federal government, all land in the states remains vested under authority of state Governors. What we find in Rivers State, for instance, is a situation where real estate developers are creating looming crises in communities, with land belonging to families being acquired and sold through means and agents that rarely mean well. It is needful that Rivers State government should give urgent attention to this phenomenon of land acquisition through means akin to gangsterism, to say the least. The situation has come to the point of describing the phenomenon as land-grabbing, whereby communal and family lands are being shared and sold at prices and terms determined by speculators. Surely, the situation is tense in some communities, neither should the possible future consequences of land sales be ignored.
Pipelines bearing and conveying mineral oil products pass through various communities in the Niger Delta areas of Nigeria. The Petroleum Industry Act has not addressed all the plight and concerns of communities which bear the harsh brunt of the oil industry. Let not politics and economics of greed make the plight of oil-producing communities worse by exposing them to looming hazards, ranging from fire and death, to animosities in communities.
By: Bright Amirize
Bright Amirize is a retired lecturer from Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education1 day agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta1 day ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers1 day ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education1 day agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News1 day agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News1 day ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
