Connect with us

Nation

Female Final Year Student’s Alleged Murderer’s Whereabouts Revealed

Published

on

The actual whereabouts of the prime suspect, Abdulrahman Bello and his four other accomplices in the tragic death of the female final year student Yetunde Lawal of the Kwara State College of Education Ilorin, has been revealed.
The revelation came to light yesterday, when he appeared before Chief Magistrate Sanusi Mohammed, in Ilorin.
He was brought to the court by operatives of the Department of State Services, DSS.
Earlier reports last week indicated that operatives of the DSS, stormed the Oke-Kura custodial centre and whisked Abdulrahman Bello and his accomplices to Abuja in continuation of the investigation into his case.
However, his appearance on Thursday before the Ilorin Chief Magistrate court revealed that the prime suspect has been in the custody of the state security service.
Chief Magistrate Sanusi Mohammed, after the court session lasting about one hour, eight minutes, ordered the suspects to be remanded in the custody of the DSS for further investigation and adjourned the case till April 9,2025, after arguments and counter arguments from the prosecution and defense counsel.
During the session, the magistrate advised the defendants to feel free to seek legal redress if they were dissatisfied with the order.
All the defendants were present in court, accompanied by their respective lawyers—except for the principal suspect, Abdulrahman Ballo, who is yet to secure legal representation.
The accused individuals include Abdulrahman Bello, Ahmed Abdulwasiu (41) – Zone C, No. 47, Adualere Area, Ilorin, Suleiman Muyideen (28) – Neolife Business, No. 7 Adualere Area, Amilere Milengbe, Ilorin, Jamiu Uthman (29) – Phone repairer, Adualere Area, Ilorin, Abdulrahmon Jamiu (31) – Farmer, Elemere Village, Moro Local Government Area, Kwara State.
The defendants arrived at the courthouse under tight security, transported in a white Toyota Hilux bus by the DSS operatives.
Representing the prosecution, Chief State Counsel, Issa Zakari, informed the court that ongoing intelligence reports had necessitated the transfer of the defendants to DSS custody for further investigation.
“My Lord, after the last adjourned date, we received intelligence reports prompting us to approach your worship to grant an order for the defendants to be moved to the custody of the DSS,” Zakari disclosed.
“As we speak, the investigation is at an advanced stage. We hereby seek an adjournment until a later date when the investigation is completed.”
However, the defence team strongly opposed the prosecution’s request. Barrister A.S. Oseni, representing the 2nd and 4th defendants, argued that the court no longer had jurisdiction since the case had been transferred to the High Court.
“During the last sitting, it was stated that investigations had been concluded. The charge has already been served at the High Court, and a hearing date of April 15, 2025, has been scheduled. This court lacks the jurisdiction to grant such an order,” Oseni declared.
Similarly, counsel for the 3rd defendant aligned with Oseni’s position, labelling the order as “barbaric, null, and void.” He further contended that the prosecution had no legal grounds to request continued DSS custody.
Counsel for the 5th defendant also urged the court to vacate the order in the interest of justice and fair hearing.
In response, Chief State Counsel Zakari dismissed the defence arguments as an attempt to obstruct justice.
“The defendants have not yet been arraigned before the High Court, nor have they taken a plea.The law empowers this court to issue such an order. If the defence is dissatisfied, they are free to challenge it at the Court of Appeal,” he further submitted.
Zakari said: “Justice is a tripartite arrangement, involving Justice to society; Justice to the victim and Justice to the defendants” urging the magistrate to disregard the defence objections and uphold the order.
Following deliberations, Magistrate S.B. Mohammed adjourned the case to Wednesday, April 9, 2025.

Continue Reading

Nation

Rivers Judiciary Denise Media Reports On Issuing Judgement Sacking SOLAD

Published

on

The Rivers State Judiciary has denied claims of media reports circulating online that a judge of its High Court issued a ruling in favour of Governor Siminalayi Fubara against former Governor Nyesom Wike and President Bola Tinubu, there by sacking the sole Administrator of the state, vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (rtd).

A statement signed by the Chief Registrar of the State High Court, David Ihua-Maduenyi yesterday in Port Harcourt, described the purported report as false and misleading, particularly for linking a judge of the State High Court, Justice Boma Diepirii, to a ruling that reportedly came from a Federal High Court.

According to the statement, Justice Boma Diepirii is a Judge of the Rivers State High Court and not of the Federal High Court and currently on Easter Vacation, which commenced on Monday, 14th April.

The Chief Registrar further clarified that the Federal High Court and the State High Court are separate entities, stressing that “the inclusion of Justice Diepiri’s name in the fabricated report underscores the crass ignorance of the author.”

“The attention of the Rivers State Judiciary has been drawn to a fake news report alleging that His Lordship, Hon. Justice Boma Diepiri, delivered a judgment sacking the Sole Administrator of Rivers State. This is false in its entirety,” the statement read.

“Justice Diepiri is a judge of the High Court of Rivers State, not of the Federal High Court as was falsely reported”.

” Additionally, His Lordship is currently on Easter vacation which began on Monday, April 14, 2025, Ihua-Maduenyi stated.

The statement however advised the general public and members of the media to always cross checked information concerning the judiciary before publishing and as well disregard the said report in its entirety as its an embodiment of falsehood and fabricated story.

Continue Reading

Nation

Senate Passes Bill For Establishment Of University In Abia

Published

on

The Senate yesterday approved the bills for the establishment of Federal University of Medical  and Health Sciences and College of Education, Bende at its plenary session.
The two bills sponsored by the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon . Benjamin Kalu came to the Senate for concurrence after the approvals from the House of Representatives.
The Deputy Leader of the Senate, Sen. Lola Ashiru in the absence of the Majority Leader presented the recommendations of the Lower Chamber for consideration and Concurrence .
The Bill for an Act to establish Federal College of Education, Bende in Abia State seeks to provide full-time courses, training in technology, applied sciences, commerce, social sciences, arts and humanities among others.
Kalu had in his lead debate stated that Bende has remained undivided since its creation in 1976, even though with the size of four local government areas as found in comparative federal constituencies.
“Despite its strategic location in Abia and sharing a border with Akwa Ibom, with a growing population and landmass, there is no tertiary institution in the Federal Constituency operated either by Federal or State Government. Bende deserves to have the presence of a tertiary institution to serve the education need of the teeming youthful population, especially now that the need for well-trained educationists has risen. This is accompanied by the need to fill the gaps created by both the consequences of brain drain and the lack of qualified educationists to provide quality training at all levels of education,” he said.
For the bill seeking the establishment of Federal University of Medical and Health Sciences, Bende, Abia State, he said when it becomes law, the university will be charged with the responsibility to, among other things, offer full-time training leading to the award of degrees in medical and health sciences.

Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi

Continue Reading

Nation

South East Caucus Kicks As  Senate Rejects  Nwosu’s Immortalisation

Published

on

South East Caucus of the Senate has  appealed to President   Bola Ahmed Tinubu  to immorttalise late Professor Humphrey Nwosu  considering his commitment  to achieving a  practical democracy for Nigerian.
The Senators visibly  angered by the  Senate’s  rejection of the  need to immortalise the late National Electoral umpire who stood for democracy through the turbulent  1993 elections  stormed out of the Senate Chambers   and spoke to the press .
The Chairman of the South East Caucus, Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe ( Abia South),  as he did in plenary on Wednesday, presented a motion for immortalisation of Humphrey Nwosu by naming the national headquarters of the Independent National Electoral Commission ( INEC) , after him , for laying the foundation in 1993 and conducting the freest and fairest Presidential election in the country .
The late Professor Nwosu was the National Chairman of the National Electoral Commission ( NEC) , now known as Independent National Electoral Commission ( INEC) , who through option A4, conducted the June 12, 19993 presidential election , adjudged to be the freest and fairest in the country.
Abaribe in the motion co – sponsored by 15 other Senators , said  late Humphrey Nwosu deserved to be immortalised like other heroes of the June 12 , 1993 presidential election .
He also urged the Federal Government to honour the late former electoral umpire with post humous  national honours .
But Abaribe’s request , seconded by Senator Victor Umeh (Anambra Central) and supported by Senators from the South East including forner Senate Leader, Yahaya Abdullahi ( Kebbi North) , was roundly rejected by other Senators who said the deceased deserved no immortalization .
Specifically , Senator Adams Oshiomhole ( Edo North) , in his contribution to the debate said the motion to him, was nothing but an attempt to manipulate and rewrite  history.
“ Professor Humphrey Nwosu as NEC Chairman in 1993, failed to deliver on the June 12 , 1993 Presidential Election for lack of Courage
“ He who is not ready to die for something , will die for nothing
“ If he was afraid of the gun from announcing the election results and winner in 1993 , he cannot be rewarded now , more so, when many Nigerians died for what he inadvertently created “, he said .

Nneka Amaechi -Nnadi

Continue Reading

Trending